18.01.2014 Views

Starved for Access: Life in Rural America's Food Deserts

Starved for Access: Life in Rural America's Food Deserts

Starved for Access: Life in Rural America's Food Deserts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Methodology<br />

Iowa Case Studies<br />

ociolog<br />

ical ral SociologicalSocietyRura<br />

iologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>Sociological<br />

Society<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>So<br />

y SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSo<br />

l ical Society<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<br />

ociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>Socio<br />

<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<br />

ogicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>Sociologic<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> counties <strong>in</strong> the United States have on average 3.8 grocery stores. 5 This study def<strong>in</strong>es a rural Iowa food desert<br />

as a county with four or fewer grocery stores. Thirteen counties fit this def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>in</strong> 2000. We selected four rural<br />

Iowa counties on the basis of three criteria: 1) four or fewer grocery stores; 2) counties with places with fewer than<br />

10,000 people and not adjacent to metro counties, us<strong>in</strong>g the 1993 ERS urban <strong>in</strong>fluence codes 6 ; and 3) above the<br />

state poverty level (which was 9.9% <strong>in</strong> 1997). We conducted a stratified random sample of the general population<br />

<strong>in</strong> each county <strong>in</strong> 2002 and 2003 us<strong>in</strong>g the Dillman “Total Design Method” mail survey approach. Response rates<br />

ranged from 60% to 64% <strong>for</strong> a total of 1,513 completed surveys. The survey asked respondents questions about<br />

access to food <strong>in</strong> their community, community ef<strong>for</strong>ts to solve food <strong>in</strong>frastructure problems, food <strong>in</strong>security, food and<br />

diet patterns, and health status.<br />

ral SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>Soc<br />

Society<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSocie<br />

SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>So<br />

ociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSocie<br />

ologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSocietyRura<br />

logicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>Sociological<br />

ociologica<br />

o<br />

y <strong>Rural</strong> SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSocietyR<br />

ogicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>Sociological<br />

SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong><br />

cal Society<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>SociologicalSociety<strong>Rural</strong>Sociological<br />

In addition, we surveyed prices <strong>in</strong> the 11 grocery stores <strong>in</strong> these four counties <strong>in</strong> the summer of 2002 (four stores)<br />

and Fall 2003 (seven stores) us<strong>in</strong>g the USDA Thrift Plan food list of items (see www.extension.iastate.edu/hunger/<br />

foodprice.htm <strong>for</strong> a complete list of the 149 food items <strong>in</strong> the survey). The USDA thrifty food plan (TFP) is the<br />

national standard <strong>for</strong> a nutritious diet at low cost. It represents a set of market basket food items people could<br />

consume at home and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a diet that meets dietary standards. The average U.S. cost of the TFP is used to<br />

set the food stamp benefit level. U.S. weekly costs of food plans (thrifty, low-cost, moderate-cost, and liberal) are<br />

reported monthly by USDA on the basis of a national food price survey adjusted <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>flation of urban areas (see<br />

http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/USDA<strong>Food</strong>PlansCostof<strong>Food</strong>.htm). We surveyed the three Wal-Mart superstores that<br />

were closest to these counties but not located with<strong>in</strong> them <strong>in</strong> fall 2003. We derived average rural grocery store<br />

prices from <strong>in</strong>dividual item average of all 11 stores. Average Wal-Mart superstore prices were derived from the<br />

average of three stores.<br />

expenditures from 17.7% <strong>in</strong> 1998 to 32.9% <strong>in</strong><br />

2004. 3 The Independent Grocers Association<br />

and other organizations can play a larger<br />

role <strong>in</strong> both <strong>in</strong>novat<strong>in</strong>g and advocat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong><br />

reasonable wholesale prices and distribution<br />

networks and other essentials <strong>for</strong> viable<br />

local grocers located <strong>in</strong> low-<strong>in</strong>come areas.<br />

• Shop locally: Encourag<strong>in</strong>g families to shop<br />

locally should be on the agenda. <strong>Rural</strong> residents<br />

frequently commute to work and many do<br />

their grocery shopp<strong>in</strong>g near work rather than<br />

<strong>in</strong> their hometowns. This exacerbates the<br />

challenges that rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g rural grocers have<br />

<strong>in</strong> stay<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ancially profitable and provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the expected variety and prices of foods.<br />

• Enhance the safety net: Civic community<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts can serve as an important safety net<br />

<strong>for</strong> disadvantaged residents. Bolster<strong>in</strong>g civic<br />

activities, such as meals on wheels, community<br />

kitchens, and food pantries, can play an<br />

important role <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g local residents with<br />

a quality diet. These ef<strong>for</strong>ts are especially<br />

important <strong>for</strong> elderly residents and others with<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial or physical constra<strong>in</strong>ts. In the policy<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!