19.01.2014 Views

Background - International Council for Children's Play

Background - International Council for Children's Play

Background - International Council for Children's Play

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Maximum flexibility<br />

• Both gross motor and fine motor play<br />

• Constructive and role play is central<br />

• Maximum children - minimum area<br />

• Minimum of accidents, calculable risks<br />

Conclusion<br />

It is sad that 99% of the schools in Norway have used millions of crones to purchase readymade<br />

climbing frames and other play apparatus that do not stimulate varied, flexible and<br />

developing play, instead of the much cheaper hut building.<br />

Why have 99% of the schools in Norway neglected to plan <strong>for</strong> a hut town, where the children<br />

are constructing and deconstructing their own out door play space?<br />

I think some reasons are the following adult attitudes:<br />

• Have never seen such a hut town in function<br />

• Huts should be in the <strong>for</strong>est<br />

• What is wrong with empty asphalt and football?<br />

• Hut building is dangerous<br />

• To little space in the school yard<br />

• No money (have used them to costly commercial apparatus!)<br />

• Ugly, scrappy, chaotic, the teacher is loosing control<br />

• Will soon be damaged of vandals<br />

• To much work <strong>for</strong> the teachers<br />

• Have not heard about it in my teacher education<br />

But I believe that the most important reason is lack of knowledge about play research and<br />

the best conditions <strong>for</strong> outdoor play, and lack of technical knowledge about materials and<br />

constructions. A building playground project with continuous changes possible, such as<br />

the projects reported herein, will stimulate the neglected constructive play and dramatic<br />

role-play outdoors. At the same time our approach is a much cheaper solution to the<br />

problem of providing outdoor play space and objects; and such an approach teach also<br />

the children that recycling the materials is important <strong>for</strong> global conservation of natural<br />

resources. This is an important lesson <strong>for</strong> the children of our wealthy western society.<br />

Literature<br />

Albertsen S (1991) Bygge på skoleplassen? FOU oppgåve i 6-10 årspedagogikk. Stord<br />

lærarhøgskule<br />

Andersen/Svane (1982) Gjør noe med skolegården. Forbruker- og<br />

Administrasjonsdepartementet<br />

Borgen C (1990) Den fantastiske leken. Skolefritidsordninger. Kompendium nr. IV<br />

Fellessekretariatet <strong>for</strong> skolefritidsordninger. KUF<br />

(1990) Tilrettelegging av lek og leke<strong>for</strong>mens utviklende betydning <strong>for</strong> barns<br />

personlighetsutvikling. Kompendium nr IV.<br />

Fellessekretariatet <strong>for</strong> skolefritidsordning.<br />

Brostrøm S (1995) 6-9 årspædagogik. Leg, leg, rammeleg. (<strong>Play</strong>, play, frame play)<br />

Systime A/S Aarhus<br />

Flemmen A (1993) Ekte leik på den politiske dagsorden i Kroppsøving årg. 43 nr<br />

7/8<br />

(1996) Høringsuttalelse: Læreplan <strong>for</strong> faget kroppsøving i Kroppsøving årg 46,<br />

nr 1<br />

Haug P (1991) 6-åringane-barnehage eller skule? Det norske samlaget. Oslo<br />

(1996) Barnehage på skule. Norsk senter <strong>for</strong> barne<strong>for</strong>skning. Trondheim<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!