Johanna Westeson - The ICHRP
Johanna Westeson - The ICHRP
Johanna Westeson - The ICHRP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
METHODOLOGY<br />
<strong>The</strong> WHO project on sexual health and human rights aims at mapping and analyzing legal<br />
practices that bear on sexual health, focusing in particular on laws and jurisprudence that<br />
through their intent, design, outcome, and reasoning have positive effects on sexual health.<br />
Criteria for selecting ‘good practices’ have been that the laws or cases a) promote sexual<br />
health, b) explicitly use a human rights framework, or implicitly make references to<br />
established human rights principles, and c) do not violate other human rights standards and<br />
norms, by intention or effect. By the application of these criteria, many times legal<br />
materials that have been included have both positive and problematic aspects. Strengths as<br />
well as potential weaknesses have been highlighted in the discussion of the material or in<br />
remarks concluding each chapter. As mentioned in the introduction, this project does not<br />
intend to analyze or evaluate implementation or practical impact of laws. Notes on<br />
implementation have been included occasionally, if there is reliable information about<br />
negative impact on sexual health emerging as a consequence of the implementation of a<br />
law, which was unintended by the legislature but may highlight weaknesses of the law<br />
itself (see for instance Chapter 8: Sex work).<br />
As also noted in the introduction, this report does not intend to be exhaustive in its<br />
presentation and analysis of laws and jurisprudence surrounding sexual health in Europe.<br />
Rather, its aim is to be illustrative – giving examples of how legislatures and courts in the<br />
region have approached issues related to sexual health, with a particular focus on models<br />
that use a human rights framework, based either on international, regional or<br />
national/constitutional human rights standards. Thus, this report does not necessarily claim<br />
to have selected ‘the best’ European laws and cases in their application to sexual health,<br />
nor does it single out some countries as ‘superior’ or more ‘rights-promoting’ than others<br />
in regard to protection of sexual health. Instead, like the rest of the WHO project of which<br />
it is a part, this report focuses on legal standards that enhance sexual health by the use of a<br />
human rights framework. Material has been selected primarily to demonstrate how, in<br />
diverse parts of the region, law is used as a tool to, inter alia, respect and protect sexual<br />
autonomy, fight discrimination on sexual or sexuality grounds, offer adequate protection<br />
against sexual violence, and promote access to sexual health services while respecting the<br />
integrity and self-determination of the individual. In limited cases laws or jurisprudence<br />
have also been highlighted that may control or restrain sexuality or compromise sexual<br />
health. <strong>The</strong>se materials have been selected to illustrate conflicting trends in the region or to<br />
draw attention to issues that are particularly problematic from a human rights standpoint.<br />
However, the reader should keep in mind that the aim of this project is not to highlight<br />
human rights violations nor systematically to document practices that prejudice sexual<br />
health.<br />
<strong>The</strong> information in this report has been obtained by extensive research on legal materials<br />
from the European region. This includes regional material from the Council of Europe and<br />
the EU, and domestic laws and case law related to sexuality and sexual health from across<br />
the region. <strong>The</strong> author has been assisted by researchers in Russia, Hungary, and Moldova,<br />
and has also on an ad hoc-basis consulted experts in the region to clarify specific issues. To<br />
the extent possible primary sources have been consulted, through the use of official<br />
databases. Attention has been drawn to relevant legal material through concluding<br />
observations by UN committees, Council of Europe and NGO publications, academic<br />
studies, and news reports.<br />
21