Volume: 16, Issue: 4 (4th Quarter 2012) - IDPA.com
Volume: 16, Issue: 4 (4th Quarter 2012) - IDPA.com
Volume: 16, Issue: 4 (4th Quarter 2012) - IDPA.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
a bit of practice it is quite possible<br />
to make hits with standard pistol<br />
on an <strong>IDPA</strong> target at 100 yards. My<br />
point is that the <strong>IDPA</strong> is based upon<br />
self-defense shooting, not target<br />
matches. There are other types of<br />
pistol <strong>com</strong>petition that address the<br />
game of target shooting.<br />
Match directors want to give<br />
participants their money’s worth<br />
at a major match. That does not<br />
mean exotic or difficult stages.<br />
A well-designed stage can be fun<br />
and challenging without being<br />
overly <strong>com</strong>plicated and beyond the<br />
abilities of the average Marksmanlevel<br />
shooter to successfully<br />
<strong>com</strong>plete. Expert and Master<br />
shooters can demonstrate their<br />
<strong>com</strong>petitive skills by shooting the<br />
stages faster and more accurately<br />
than their opponents. That is really<br />
what the <strong>IDPA</strong> is all about.<br />
What goes up must <strong>com</strong>e down.<br />
The <strong>IDPA</strong> rule book currently<br />
states that “Shooters may not go<br />
down in classification except for<br />
permanent physical disability or<br />
for other irrevocable reasons. <strong>IDPA</strong><br />
HQ will determine this.”<br />
This made sense in the early days<br />
of the <strong>IDPA</strong>. The intent was to<br />
prevent shooters from jumping up<br />
and down in classification so that<br />
they could <strong>com</strong>pete against lesser<br />
<strong>com</strong>petition.<br />
Things have changed since then;<br />
the <strong>IDPA</strong> has been around for over<br />
15 years now. To put that into<br />
perspective, a member who joined<br />
back then at the vigorous age of<br />
35 is now a creaky 50. Of course,<br />
one of the pleasures of our sport<br />
is that it is possible to continue to<br />
<strong>com</strong>pete and <strong>com</strong>pete successfully<br />
well past middle age, but there are<br />
limits. Sooner or later we all begin<br />
to slow down and are not able<br />
shoot as effectively as we once did<br />
and more to the point as well as our<br />
fellow <strong>com</strong>petitors. Yes, there is a<br />
“high senior” recognition provided<br />
at some matches but that is not the<br />
same as head to head <strong>com</strong>pletion.<br />
In addition to issues with age,<br />
some of us have to drop out of<br />
shooting due to work conflicts,<br />
relocation, illness, or other<br />
significant life interferences.<br />
Although a shooter will not regress<br />
<strong>com</strong>pletely with an extended<br />
layoff, it can take literally years<br />
to regain one’s previous shooting<br />
expertise. That can lead to a very<br />
long series of matches where a<br />
shooter is quite literally outclassed.<br />
Finally, there are shooters who<br />
have that ‘one great match’ and<br />
find themselves totally out of their<br />
league in that division, limiting<br />
their future status in sanctioned<br />
matches to that of a permanent<br />
Random Shots<br />
also-ran. There is nothing wrong<br />
with that - provided the shooter<br />
is a casual member who does not<br />
attend many sanctioned matches.<br />
Whatever the reason for a decline<br />
in a shooter’s ability to shoot, a<br />
participant in a <strong>com</strong>petition should<br />
have the feeling that he is directly<br />
<strong>com</strong>peting against his shooting<br />
peers, especially in the case of a<br />
big sanctioned match. Shooting<br />
as well as you are able and still<br />
winding up near the bottom of your<br />
division/classification at match<br />
after match is disheartening.<br />
The rulebook needs to have<br />
additional criteria for allowing<br />
a shooter do go down in<br />
classification. The most obvious<br />
way to do this is to allow shooters<br />
to petition <strong>IDPA</strong> HQ for a reduction<br />
in classification for causes<br />
other than “permanent physical<br />
(Continued on page 32)<br />
<strong>IDPA</strong> Tactical Journal Fourth <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> 13