21.01.2014 Views

Volume: 16, Issue: 4 (4th Quarter 2012) - IDPA.com

Volume: 16, Issue: 4 (4th Quarter 2012) - IDPA.com

Volume: 16, Issue: 4 (4th Quarter 2012) - IDPA.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a bit of practice it is quite possible<br />

to make hits with standard pistol<br />

on an <strong>IDPA</strong> target at 100 yards. My<br />

point is that the <strong>IDPA</strong> is based upon<br />

self-defense shooting, not target<br />

matches. There are other types of<br />

pistol <strong>com</strong>petition that address the<br />

game of target shooting.<br />

Match directors want to give<br />

participants their money’s worth<br />

at a major match. That does not<br />

mean exotic or difficult stages.<br />

A well-designed stage can be fun<br />

and challenging without being<br />

overly <strong>com</strong>plicated and beyond the<br />

abilities of the average Marksmanlevel<br />

shooter to successfully<br />

<strong>com</strong>plete. Expert and Master<br />

shooters can demonstrate their<br />

<strong>com</strong>petitive skills by shooting the<br />

stages faster and more accurately<br />

than their opponents. That is really<br />

what the <strong>IDPA</strong> is all about.<br />

What goes up must <strong>com</strong>e down.<br />

The <strong>IDPA</strong> rule book currently<br />

states that “Shooters may not go<br />

down in classification except for<br />

permanent physical disability or<br />

for other irrevocable reasons. <strong>IDPA</strong><br />

HQ will determine this.”<br />

This made sense in the early days<br />

of the <strong>IDPA</strong>. The intent was to<br />

prevent shooters from jumping up<br />

and down in classification so that<br />

they could <strong>com</strong>pete against lesser<br />

<strong>com</strong>petition.<br />

Things have changed since then;<br />

the <strong>IDPA</strong> has been around for over<br />

15 years now. To put that into<br />

perspective, a member who joined<br />

back then at the vigorous age of<br />

35 is now a creaky 50. Of course,<br />

one of the pleasures of our sport<br />

is that it is possible to continue to<br />

<strong>com</strong>pete and <strong>com</strong>pete successfully<br />

well past middle age, but there are<br />

limits. Sooner or later we all begin<br />

to slow down and are not able<br />

shoot as effectively as we once did<br />

and more to the point as well as our<br />

fellow <strong>com</strong>petitors. Yes, there is a<br />

“high senior” recognition provided<br />

at some matches but that is not the<br />

same as head to head <strong>com</strong>pletion.<br />

In addition to issues with age,<br />

some of us have to drop out of<br />

shooting due to work conflicts,<br />

relocation, illness, or other<br />

significant life interferences.<br />

Although a shooter will not regress<br />

<strong>com</strong>pletely with an extended<br />

layoff, it can take literally years<br />

to regain one’s previous shooting<br />

expertise. That can lead to a very<br />

long series of matches where a<br />

shooter is quite literally outclassed.<br />

Finally, there are shooters who<br />

have that ‘one great match’ and<br />

find themselves totally out of their<br />

league in that division, limiting<br />

their future status in sanctioned<br />

matches to that of a permanent<br />

Random Shots<br />

also-ran. There is nothing wrong<br />

with that - provided the shooter<br />

is a casual member who does not<br />

attend many sanctioned matches.<br />

Whatever the reason for a decline<br />

in a shooter’s ability to shoot, a<br />

participant in a <strong>com</strong>petition should<br />

have the feeling that he is directly<br />

<strong>com</strong>peting against his shooting<br />

peers, especially in the case of a<br />

big sanctioned match. Shooting<br />

as well as you are able and still<br />

winding up near the bottom of your<br />

division/classification at match<br />

after match is disheartening.<br />

The rulebook needs to have<br />

additional criteria for allowing<br />

a shooter do go down in<br />

classification. The most obvious<br />

way to do this is to allow shooters<br />

to petition <strong>IDPA</strong> HQ for a reduction<br />

in classification for causes<br />

other than “permanent physical<br />

(Continued on page 32)<br />

<strong>IDPA</strong> Tactical Journal Fourth <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!