Survey of Existing Web Models Techniques to Design Web Application

Anup Hande et al , Int.J.Computer Technology & Applications,Vol 4 (3),514-521
ISSN:2229-6093
10.3 Summary of the MDD Perspective Analysis
Method
Visual
Syn.
And
Meta
Model
Req.
Spec.
Tool
OOHDM Ok -
WSDM Ok - -
SOHDM Ok - -
UWE
Ok
AgroUWE
Magic
UWE
WebML Ok -
OOH Ok - -
OOWS
Ok
RE tools
based on
Eclips
W2000 Ok - -
NDT Ok NDT suits
Deriv. of
Conceptual
Models
Transformations
specified with :
textual guidelines
applied :
manually (no
tools)
Transformations
specified with:
QVT applied:
manually (no
tools)
Transformations
specified in :
textual guidelines
applied :
manually(no
lools)
Transformations
specified with:
graph
transformations
applied :
automatically
(AGG tools)
Implemented as
AGG Graph
Transformation
Transformations
Specified with ::
QVT
Applied:
automatically
(NDT Suite)
Implemented as:
Enterprise
Architect
templates.
Figure 14 Summary of the MDD Perspective Analysis
11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A large number of different methods for Web application
modeling have been developed in the last decade.
However, some methods will probably converge during
the course of further development. It is currently hard to
predict how far this converging trend will go and whether
it will eventually lead to a “Unified Web Modeling
Language”, similarly to the development of the UML. It is,
however, uncontested that there is a trend towards using
UML as notation language. Some methods are moving
from their proprietary notation to a UML compliant one
and introduce a UML profile for their method.
The methods that will succeed will be determined by the
tool support offered for their modeling method. In the
future, tools will systematically support not only the
notation, but also the development process allowing for a
model-driven development approach. However, this means
that the methods will have to define clear guidelines and
approaches, in contrast to the current situation. It also
means that agile approaches (Ambler 2002) will most
likely have to be considered, but they will have to be
harmonized in view of (semi) automatic generation.
The inclusion of Web services in model-based Web
application development projects will bring new
challenges, the most critical probably being the interplay
between top-down modelling and bottom-up integration of
existing services and adequate tool support.
References
[1] Manuel Wimmer, Andrea Schauerhuber, Wieland
Schwinger, Horst Kargl : “On the Integration of Web
Modeling Languages: Preliminary Results and Future
Challenges “:IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING.
[2] Guotao Zhuang, Junwei Du : “MDA-BASED
Modeling and Implementation of E-Commerce Web
Applications in WebML” 2nd international workshop
on computer CSE 2009
[3] Gerti Kappel, Birgid Pröll, Siegfried Reich, Werner
Retschitzegger (eds.),dpunkt-verlag:“Web
Engineering: Systematic Development of Web
Applications”
[4] Gustavo Rossi , Oscar Pastro, Daniel Schwade, Luis
Olsina “Web Engineering: Modelling and
Implementing Web Applications” Human-
Computer Interaction Series ISSN 1571-5035
[5] Stefano Ceri, Piero Fraternali, Aldo Bongio :” Web
Modeling Language (WebML): a modeling language
for designing Web sites” IETJournal
[6] Andreas Kraus : Model Driven Software Engineering
for Web Applications"
[7] Nathalie Moreno, Piero Fraternali, Antonio Vallecillo
“WebML Modeling in UML“ IET Journal.
[8] Marco Brambilla, Sara Comai, Piero Fraternali,
Maristella Matera: "DESIGNING WEB
APPLICATIONS WITH WEBML AND
WEBRATIO"
[9] Stefano Ceri, Piero Fraternali, Maristella Matera
:"Conceptual modeling of data-intensive Web
applications“
[10] Thiago Jabur Bittar, renata P. M. Fortes, Luanana
Lopes Lobato, and Willian M. Watanabe "Web
Communication and Interaction Modeling using
Model Driven Develpment“ SIGDOC’09, October
5–7, 2009, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
IJCTA | May-June 2013
Available online@www.ijcta.com
521