27.01.2014 Views

Hyper-Lagrangian Submanifolds of Hyperkähler Manifolds and ...

Hyper-Lagrangian Submanifolds of Hyperkähler Manifolds and ...

Hyper-Lagrangian Submanifolds of Hyperkähler Manifolds and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Hyper</strong>-<strong>Lagrangian</strong> <strong>Submanifolds</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hyper</strong>kähler <strong>Manifolds</strong> <strong>and</strong> Mean Curvature Flow 353<br />

are complex structures orthogonal to J . Let’s denote these three combinations by J = ∑ α a αJ α ,<br />

K = ∑ α b αJ α , JK = ∑ α c αJ α <strong>and</strong> write a = (a 1 ,a 2 ,a 3 ) <strong>and</strong> so on. Then the map J is<br />

represented by<br />

a(t,x) = (cos θ sin ϕ, sin θ sin ϕ, cos ϕ) .<br />

By a straightforward calculation, we have<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

a(t o ,p)= (1, 0, 0), b(t o ,p)= (0, 1, 0), c(t o ,p)= (0, 0, 1) ,<br />

∇b(t o ,p)= (−∇θ| (to ,p), 0, 0), ∇c(t o ,p)= (∇ϕ| (to ,p), 0, 0) ,<br />

∂ t b(t o ,p)= (−∂ t θ| (to ,p), 0, 0), ∂ t c(t o ,p)= (∂ t ϕ| (to ,p), 0, 0) ,<br />

b ×∇b| (to ,p) = (0, 0, ∇θ| (to ,p)), c ×∇c| (to ,p) = (0, ∇ϕ| (to ,p), 0) ,<br />

△b(t o ,p)= ( −△θ,−|∇θ| 2 , 0 )∣ ∣<br />

(to ,p) ,<br />

△c(t o ,p)= ( △ ϕ,2∇θ ·∇ϕ,−|∇ϕ| 2)∣ ∣<br />

(to ,p) .<br />

In the above, ∇ <strong>and</strong> △ denote the gradient <strong>and</strong> the Laplacian with respect to the induced metric<br />

on L to ; b ×∇b <strong>and</strong> c ×∇c the cross products by regarding b, ∇b, c, <strong>and</strong> ∇c as 3-vectors.<br />

By assumption, both g(K·, ·) <strong>and</strong> g(JK·, ·) vanish on T x L t for any (t, x) in a neighborhood<br />

<strong>of</strong> (t o ,p). In particular, ω 2 = ω 3 = 0at(t o ,p). Then by applying Proposition 3.1 to the 2-form<br />

g(K·, ·), we have at the point (t o ,p),<br />

0 = [(∂ t −△)b 1 ]ω 1,ij − 2∇ k b 1 ∇ k ω 1,ij<br />

+ ∑ α<br />

(h α,kkj ∇ i b α − h α,kki ∇ j b α ).<br />

Note that we have used the fact that ∑ s Rs sji = 0 whenever g(K·, ·) ≡ 0 by the flatness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ricci curvature, see [11]. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, Lemmas 3.3 <strong>and</strong> 3.2 imply<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

∇ω 1,ij = 0 ,<br />

∑<br />

h α,kkj ∇ i b α = 0 .<br />

Hence, we conclude that<br />

0 =[(∂ t −△ t )b 1 ]ω 1,ij .<br />

Since ω 2 = ω 3 = 0, we have ω 1 ̸= 0. Therefore,<br />

α<br />

(∂ t −△ t )b 1 = 0 ,<br />

which is equivalent to<br />

(∂ t −△ t )θ = 0 at(t o ,p).<br />

Similarly, by applying Proposition 3.1, <strong>and</strong> Lemmas 3.3 <strong>and</strong> 3.2 to the symplectic form g(JK·, ·),<br />

we have<br />

(∂ t −△ t )ϕ = 0 at(t o ,p).<br />

All together, we have proved that J satisfies<br />

as a mapping from [0,T)× L 0 to S 2 .<br />

(∂ t −△ t )J = 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!