29.10.2012 Views

WG III - WD 29 1 THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION Brussels, 24 ...

WG III - WD 29 1 THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION Brussels, 24 ...

WG III - WD 29 1 THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION Brussels, 24 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Article 300 TEC (as amended by the Treaty of Nice) could serve as the basis for this<br />

new article and the provisions of Articles <strong>24</strong>/38 TEU (with, perhaps, some amendments)<br />

added to it. In this connection, there is in particular a suggestion that Article <strong>24</strong> TEU<br />

should no longer provide for the possibility of a procedure for national parliamentary<br />

approval of agreements concluded by the Union on the basis of its competences.<br />

Ratification by national parliaments could, however, continue to be required for<br />

traditional mixed agreements (cumulative competence of the Union and the Member<br />

States);<br />

4. The negotiation and conclusion procedure applicable for agreements would be the one<br />

arising from the area of law concerned (Community law and/or Titles V and VI TEU).<br />

When dealing with an agreement which covers several fields at the same time<br />

("cross-pillar mixity"), the negotiating procedure would be determined by the Council<br />

depending on the subject-matter of the agreement, while maintaining the present<br />

institutional balance. If the main subject of the agreement comes under a specific<br />

subject-matter, a single legal basis would apply;<br />

5. The Working Group stresses that the cohesion of the Union's position would be<br />

strengthened if it were represented by a single voice in negotiations. Nevertheless, the<br />

majority of the Working Group recognises that in certain cases of mixed agreements<br />

which came under areas corresponding to the current pillars, there could be justification<br />

for a multiple Union delegation (Council Presidency, Commission), while maintaining<br />

the institutional balance provided for in the Treaties;<br />

6. The majority of the Working Group thought it would be useful to specify that if the<br />

Council (and the Member States, in the case of traditional mixed agreements) wished to<br />

charge the Commission with negotiating the entire agreement, it would be free to do so<br />

(in this context, the Working Group hoped that the Working Group on External Action<br />

would examine the scope for ruling out any pointless duplication);<br />

<strong>WG</strong> <strong>III</strong> - <strong>WD</strong> <strong>29</strong> 16<br />

EN

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!