case study Haiti - United Nations Development Programme
case study Haiti - United Nations Development Programme
case study Haiti - United Nations Development Programme
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Haiti</strong> that could serve as models elsewhere. On the management side, the major innovation<br />
was the creation of a totally integrated management structure between UNDP and<br />
MINUSTAH; another major advance was the decision of the Security Council to allocate<br />
limited resources from assessed contributions for reintegration activities of the DDR<br />
programme.<br />
Major lessons derived from this <strong>case</strong> <strong>study</strong> in <strong>Haiti</strong> include:<br />
• The international community shares some of the responsibility for the crisis in <strong>Haiti</strong> in<br />
the absence of a proactive prevention strategy and a sustained long-term commitment.<br />
• The concept of integrated missions is being promoted through the formal adoption of<br />
‘integrated areas of activity’ (DDR, justice, electoral support, national dialogue and<br />
protection of the children). The formula could help promote a more coherent<br />
cooperation between the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong> mission and members of the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong><br />
Country Team.<br />
• UNDP’s role in support of the electoral process has been effective but limited only to<br />
providing administrative and technical support. This has raised questions about the<br />
justification of UNDP’s participation in terms of the organization’s core mandate.<br />
• Important management and funding innovations introduced in the DDR programmes<br />
could serve as models for other, similar situations.<br />
• UNDP has shown leadership through its capacity to adapt, anticipate and innovate.<br />
• UNDP’s capacity to create Trust Funds and manage them with flexibility is viewed as<br />
a major asset by both the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong> Secretariat and donor partners. On the other<br />
hand, UNDP’s image suffers because of its slow procedures for disbursing funds to<br />
implementing partners, contractors and staff.<br />
• UNDP’s outreach beyond Port-au-Prince is rather limited. Opportunities have<br />
probably been lost to capitalize on a security situation reported as more favourable in<br />
the countryside and urban centres outside the capital city.<br />
• Relations with the civil society have been intense but are often based on personal<br />
contacts rather than on structured institutional arrangements.