Antioxidant in Transformer Oil Measurment - Wilks Enterprise, Inc.
Antioxidant in Transformer Oil Measurment - Wilks Enterprise, Inc.
Antioxidant in Transformer Oil Measurment - Wilks Enterprise, Inc.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Absorbance (A)<br />
DBPC Standards <strong>in</strong> M<strong>in</strong>eral <strong>Oil</strong>:<br />
Absorbance as a Function of Inhibitor<br />
Concentration<br />
0.3<br />
0.25<br />
0.55<br />
0.2<br />
0.15<br />
0.1<br />
0.138 0.275<br />
0.05<br />
0 0<br />
R 2 = 0.9499<br />
0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600<br />
DBPC Prepared Wt %<br />
DBPC Standards<br />
<strong>in</strong> M<strong>in</strong>eral <strong>Oil</strong><br />
L<strong>in</strong>ear (DBPC<br />
Standards <strong>in</strong><br />
M<strong>in</strong>eral <strong>Oil</strong>)<br />
DBPC Standards & Absorbance<br />
Sample DBPC Wt %<br />
Absorbance Prepared<br />
0.277 0.55<br />
0.114 0.275<br />
0.109 0.138<br />
.0 0<br />
Chart 1<br />
Graph 1 Standards Comparison<br />
The absorbance value of the <strong>in</strong>hibitor <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>eral oil has been determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be l<strong>in</strong>ear through and up to<br />
the prepared 0.55 wt % standard.<br />
The samples for this study were dielectric fluids drawn from transformers <strong>in</strong> service at the time. The<br />
particular samples selected were from available samples submitted to the S. D. Myers, <strong>Inc</strong> laboratory<br />
for dielectric quality checks <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>hibitor content. After the laboratory completed this test, the oil<br />
samples were tested on the commercial portable IR <strong>in</strong>struments of several companies, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
<strong>Wilks</strong> InfraCal Filtometer. The results from this split sample comparison, with <strong>Wilks</strong>, are shown below<br />
<strong>in</strong> both Graph 2 and Chart 2 (last column). The results agreed reasonably well.