15.02.2014 Views

Effect of microcapsule size on the performance of self-healing ...

Effect of microcapsule size on the performance of self-healing ...

Effect of microcapsule size on the performance of self-healing ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J.D. Rule et al. / Polymer 48 (2007) 3520e3529<br />

3527<br />

volumes are small (as with a crack separati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>ly 3 mm)<br />

<strong>self</strong>-<strong>healing</strong> can be achieved with as little as 1.25 wt% <str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

or with <str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g>s that are smaller than 30 mm.<br />

By establishing <strong>the</strong> relati<strong>on</strong>ship between <str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g>,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g>s weight fracti<strong>on</strong>, and crack volume, it is now<br />

possible to rati<strong>on</strong>ally design <strong>self</strong>-<strong>healing</strong> systems that are<br />

tailored to repair specific types <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> damage.<br />

Appendix. Fracture <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> TDCB specimens with localized<br />

incorporati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> catalyst<br />

Fig. 10. Fracture test results as a functi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>healing</strong> agent delivery (calculated<br />

by Eq. (5)) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>self</strong>-healed TDCB specimens with a short groove. Various<br />

weight fracti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 251 mm capsules are compared with 15 wt% weight<br />

fracti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> various <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. For reference, <strong>the</strong> results with fullycracked<br />

TDCB specimens with 251 mm capsules are included as well.<br />

and given that <strong>the</strong> short-groove specimens require less <strong>healing</strong><br />

agent, <strong>self</strong>-<strong>healing</strong> with smaller <str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g>s should be possible<br />

in this case. To c<strong>on</strong>firm this hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, trials were also<br />

performed over a range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g> while fixing <strong>the</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g>s weight fracti<strong>on</strong> at 15 wt%. (Fig. 10). The required<br />

<strong>healing</strong> agent delivery for <strong>the</strong> short-groove system is<br />

again c<strong>on</strong>sistent with <strong>the</strong> crack volume. With a crack separati<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 3 mm, <strong>the</strong> short-groove specimen has a crack volume<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> about 0.3 mL/cm 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> crack face. Thus, <strong>the</strong> minimum amount<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>healing</strong> agent delivery expected to fill this crack is about<br />

0.3 mg/cm 2 , which correlates well with <strong>the</strong> experimental<br />

data (Fig. 10). The maximum amount <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>self</strong>-<strong>healing</strong> for specimens<br />

with a 29 mm average <str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g> diameter was nearly<br />

<strong>the</strong> same as for specimens with larger <str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. The excellent<br />

<strong>self</strong>-<strong>healing</strong> achieved with <strong>the</strong>se relatively small <str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

is noteworthy c<strong>on</strong>sidering that our previous reports<br />

(all with larger crack volumes) show losses in <strong>self</strong>-<strong>healing</strong> <strong>performance</strong><br />

with <str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g>s smaller than 180 mm. These data<br />

c<strong>on</strong>firm that <strong>the</strong> minimum <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g>s needed for<br />

<strong>self</strong>-<strong>healing</strong> depends <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> crack that is being<br />

healed. The data also represent <strong>the</strong> most effective <strong>self</strong>-<strong>healing</strong><br />

with <strong>the</strong> smallest <str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g>s reported to date.<br />

5. C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong><br />

The amount <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>healing</strong> agent delivered in a <strong>self</strong>-<strong>healing</strong> material<br />

is determined by <strong>the</strong> product <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g> weight<br />

fracti<strong>on</strong> and <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g> diameter. Aut<strong>on</strong>omic delivery <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>healing</strong> agent using <str<strong>on</strong>g>microcapsule</str<strong>on</strong>g>s gives <strong>the</strong> same <strong>healing</strong> <strong>performance</strong><br />

as when a similar amount <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>healing</strong> agent is delivered<br />

manually. If sufficient <strong>healing</strong> agent is delivered to fill <strong>the</strong><br />

crack volume, <strong>the</strong> <strong>healing</strong> <strong>performance</strong> is maximized. However,<br />

when <strong>the</strong> crack volume exceeds <strong>the</strong> amount <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> available<br />

<strong>healing</strong> agent, less successful <strong>healing</strong> is achieved. When crack<br />

Because Grubbs’ catalyst is available <strong>on</strong>ly in limited quantities<br />

and is expensive, testing methods that minimize catalyst<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> are necessary for repetitive testing <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>self</strong>-<strong>healing</strong><br />

samples and large sets <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> data. In <strong>the</strong>se fracture tests, catalyst<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly participates in <strong>self</strong>-<strong>healing</strong> up<strong>on</strong> exposure <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> newly<br />

fractured crack plane. Catalyst that is distant from <strong>the</strong> exposed<br />

crack plane remains unused and is wasted in <strong>self</strong>-<strong>healing</strong><br />

evaluati<strong>on</strong>s. To more efficiently use <strong>the</strong> catalyst in our experimental<br />

testing program, a new specimen c<strong>on</strong>figurati<strong>on</strong> was<br />

developed such that <strong>the</strong> catalyst phase is c<strong>on</strong>fined <strong>on</strong>ly to<br />

<strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>s where <strong>the</strong> damage is expected to occur, i.e. near<br />

<strong>the</strong> centerline groove in a TDCB specimen (Fig. A1). During<br />

sample fabricati<strong>on</strong>, a silic<strong>on</strong>e spacer is placed in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong><br />

within <strong>the</strong> mold where <strong>the</strong> catalyst-c<strong>on</strong>taining resin will ultimately<br />

be located. The remainder <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> mold is <strong>the</strong>n filled<br />

with resin to produce a ‘‘blank’’ that does not c<strong>on</strong>tain <strong>the</strong><br />

catalyst. After a prescribed amount <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cure time, <strong>the</strong> spacer<br />

is removed and this regi<strong>on</strong> is <strong>the</strong>n filled with <strong>the</strong> catalystc<strong>on</strong>taining<br />

resin. The complete specimen is <strong>the</strong>n cured for<br />

24 h at RT followed by 24 h at 35 C.<br />

These ‘‘localized’’ TDCB specimens c<strong>on</strong>tain two slightly<br />

different resin formulati<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>on</strong>e for <strong>the</strong> localized <strong>self</strong>-<strong>healing</strong><br />

regi<strong>on</strong> al<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> centerline groove and <strong>on</strong>e for <strong>the</strong> blank surrounding<br />

this regi<strong>on</strong>, yet <strong>the</strong>y are intended to act as models<br />

for ‘‘full’’ specimens that have <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e type <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> resin. We<br />

hoped to c<strong>on</strong>firm whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> fracture properties <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

two types <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> specimens are approximately equivalent. A systematic<br />

study was undertaken to compare <strong>the</strong> fracture behavior<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> localized TDCB and full TDCB specimens in order to dem<strong>on</strong>strate<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir equivalence in terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>healing</strong> assessment.<br />

As a baseline for comparis<strong>on</strong>, full TDCB specimens <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

EPON 828/DETA were tested yielding an average fracture<br />

toughness <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 0.87 MPa m 1/2 . The toughness reported here is<br />

higher than in some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> our previous studies due to a slightly<br />

higher post-cure temperature used here (35 C vs. 30 C).<br />

Equivalent localized TDCB samples were <strong>the</strong>n prepared with<br />

neat resin in both <strong>the</strong> blank and center regi<strong>on</strong>s. The average<br />

fracture toughness <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se specimens is <strong>on</strong>ly slightly higher<br />

than with <strong>the</strong> full TDCB geometry (Table A1). When 5 wt%<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> catalyst-c<strong>on</strong>taining wax microspheres are included in <strong>the</strong><br />

center regi<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> average fracture toughness is equivalent to<br />

that obtained for <strong>the</strong> full TDCB <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> neat epoxy (Table A1).<br />

When 10 wt% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> capsules were added to full TDCB<br />

specimens, <strong>the</strong> fracture toughness increases to 0.98 MPa m 1/2<br />

(Table A2). The increase in toughness due to <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!