24.02.2014 Views

case summary - Office of Indiana State Chemist - Purdue University

case summary - Office of Indiana State Chemist - Purdue University

case summary - Office of Indiana State Chemist - Purdue University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CASE SUMMARY<br />

Case #2012/0841<br />

Complainant:<br />

<strong>Office</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Indiana</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Chemist</strong> (OISC)<br />

175 S. <strong>University</strong> Street<br />

West Lafayette, IN 47907-2063<br />

Applicator: Hillcrest Supply, Inc. (licensed business)<br />

6134 E. 200 N.<br />

Montgomery, IN 47538<br />

812-486-3261<br />

1. On May 31, 2012, I conducted a facility inspection at Hillcrest Supply and during a check<br />

<strong>of</strong> Restricted Use Pesticide (RUP) sales records, I discovered they had sold RUP products<br />

to an unlicensed person.<br />

2. The RUP sales records given to me at the time <strong>of</strong> my inspection indicated Melvin Yoder<br />

had been sold an RUP on April 9, 2012 and on May 16, 2012. A check <strong>of</strong> the OISC<br />

database indicated that Mr. Yoder had not renewed his license since the year 2005 and<br />

the license was currently inactive.<br />

3. I discussed this issue with the Facility Manager, Roman Wagler. Mr. Wagler confirmed<br />

they had sold RUP’s to Mr. Yoder and were not sure how they had not noticed the fact he<br />

no longer had a license.<br />

Scott M. Farris Date: June 5, 2012<br />

Pesticide Investigator<br />

Disposition: Hillcrest Supply Inc. was cited for two (2) counts <strong>of</strong> violation <strong>of</strong> 357 IAC 1-3-2 <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Indiana</strong> Pesticide Registration Law for distributing restricted use pesticides to a noncertified<br />

user. A civil penalty in the amount <strong>of</strong> $1,000.00 (2 counts x $500.00 per count) was<br />

assessed. Consideration was given to the fact this was not their first violation concerning<br />

handling and distribution <strong>of</strong> restricted use pesticides (see 2008/0208 and 2008/0329).<br />

George N. Saxton Draft Date: June 7, 2012<br />

Compliance <strong>Office</strong>r Draft Date: July 31, 2012<br />

Final Date: September 14, 2012<br />

Page 1 <strong>of</strong> 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!