Detention Risk Screening Instruments - JDAI Helpdesk

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$ Why is it necessary? RAI Monitoring " Track instrument effects " Avoid breakdown of the screening process $ Data to be tracked " <strong>Detention</strong> volume and rate " Override rates and reasons, special detention cases " DMC effects, data on “problem area” cases $ Integrated monitoring systems $ Assigning monitoring responsibility $ Annual reviews of the RAI
Monitoring Results Example Pierce County (WA) - RAI Test Results (2004): <strong>Detention</strong> outcomes by offense class, “Old” vs. “New” RAI (New Arrests Only- N=200) STATUTORY OFFENSE CLASS NUMBER SCREENED NUMBER DETAINED: “OLD” RAI PERCENT DETAINED: ‘OLD” RAI NUMBER DETAINED: “NEW” RAI PERCENT DETAINED: “NEW” RAI A+, A, A- 7 7 100% 7 100% B+ 19 19 100% 9 47% B 27 20 74% 7 26% C, C+ 42 14 33% 5 12% D+, D, E 105 39 37% 27 26% Total 200 99 50% 55 28%
Page 1 and 2: Juvenile Detention Alternatives Ini
Page 3 and 4: Small group discussion Think about
Page 5 and 6: JDAI Risk Assessment Instruments (R
Page 7 and 8: RAI Construction 1) Review RAI mode
Page 9 and 10: Offense Factor Tips " Set serious/v
Page 11 and 12: Delinquent History Factors " Prior
Page 13 and 14: Aggravation & Mitigation Factors "
Page 15 and 16: Decision Scale $ Example: 15+ point
Page 17 and 18: Special Cases Common Problems " Too
Page 19: Controlling Overrides # List specif

Detention Risk Screening Instruments - JDAI Helpdesk

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?