Test of stellar hydrodynamics predictions

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Magnetized (Large Scale) RT Model negligible field: beta=250,000 modest field: beta=2,500 See also early work by Jun, Norman, & Stone (1995). April 26, 2011 24
Core-Collapse Collapse Supernovae Type II Massive Single H-rich April 26, 2011 25
Page 1 and 2: NIF Tests of Stellar Hydrodynamics
Page 3 and 4: Our Stellar Neighbours Type II Mass
Page 5 and 6: Computational Astrophysics A couple
Page 7 and 8: Thermonuclear Supernovae Type Ia Me
Page 9 and 10: SN Ia: Double Degenerates Products
Page 11 and 12: Quest for Thermonuclear Ignition Ap
Page 13 and 14: HED Laboratory Astrophysics High En
Page 15 and 16: Supersonic Shear in HED Experiments
Page 17 and 18: SN Ia: Single Degenerates Products
Page 19 and 20: RT-Unstable Supernova Flame Zhang e
Page 21 and 22: Successful Gedanke Experiments •
Page 23: Discovery Science, At Last? • In-
Page 27 and 28: Obs. #1: SN 1987A ejecta tomography
Page 29 and 30: Core-Collapse Collapse SN Explosion
Page 31 and 32: SASI in 3D Princeton LANL ORNL MPA
Page 33 and 34: Complex Post-Explosion SN Dynamics
Page 35 and 36: Post-Explosion: Shocking the Envelo
Page 37 and 38: 56 Ni. How Much? How Fast? Followin
Page 39 and 40: HED Tests of ccSN RT Mixing • Mot
Page 41 and 42: HED Tests of ccSN RT Mixing • Mot
Page 43 and 44: NIF DSNRT Diagnostics April 26, 201
Page 45 and 46: NIF DSNRT Design Grosskopf et al. (
Page 47: April 26, 2011 Questions and Discus

Test of stellar hydrodynamics predictions

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?