tsrp63entire

IUCN 2012: IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2012.2. www.iucnredlist.org (downloaded 27 May 2013).
IUCN; Conservation International; NatureServe 2006: Global Amphibian Assessment. www.globalamphibians.org
(viewed May 2009).
Kane, P.A. 1980: A comparison of diet and feeding behaviour of Hamilton’s frog, Leiopelma hamiltoni, and the brown tree
frog, Litoria ewingi. Unpublished BSc Honours report, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington. 58 p.
Kiesecker, J.M.; Belden, L.K.; Shea, K.; Rubbo, M.J. 2004: Amphibian decline and emerging disease. American Scientist 92:
138–147.
Lee, J.S.F.; Waldman, B. 2002: Communication by fecal chemosignals in an archaic frog, Leiopelma hamiltoni. Copeia
2002(3): 679–686.
Le Roux, J.; Bell, B.D. 2007: A re-estimation of the population size of Leiopelma pakeka (Anura: Leiopelmatidae) in its
remnant forest habitat on Maud Island. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 34: 265–266.
Lukis, K.L. 2009: Returning an endemic frog to the New Zealand mainland: transfer and adaptive management of
Leiopelma pakeka at Karori Sanctuary, Wellington. Unpublished MSc thesis, Victoria University of Wellington,
Wellington. 121 p.
Lukis, K.; Bell, B.D. 2007: Restoring native frogs to a mainland island reserve: translocation and adaptive management
of the Maud Island frog (Leiopelma pakeka) in the presence of house mice (Mus musculus) at Karori Wildlife
Sanctuary. P. 267 in: Abstracts of papers presented at the 12th Biennial Conference of the Society for Research on
Amphibians and Reptiles in New Zealand, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 9–11 February 2007.
New Zealand Journal of Zoology 34: 259–272.
MacKenzie, D.I.; Nichols, J.D.; Lachman, G.B.; Droege, S.; Rohle, J.A.; Langtimm, C.A. 2002: Estimating site occupancy
rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83: 2248–2255.
McInnes, K. 2008: Captive Management Standard Operating Procedure. National Office, Department of Conservation,
Wellington (unpublished). 46 p.
Newman, D. 1990: Activity, dispersion, and population densities of Hamilton’s frog (Leiopelma hamiltoni) on Maud and
Stephens Islands, New Zealand. Herpetologica 46(3): 319–330.
Newman, D. 1996: Native frog (Leiopelma spp.) recovery plan. Threatened Species Recovery Plan 18. Department of
Conservation, Wellington. 35 p.
Newman, D.G.; Bell, B.D.; Bishop, P.J.; Burns, R.; Haigh, A.; Hitchmough, R.A. 2013: Conservation status of New Zealand
frogs, 2013. New Zealand Threat Classification Series 5. Department of Conservation, Wellington. 10 p.
Ohmer, M.E.; Herbert, S.M.; Speare, R.; Bishop, P.J. 2013: Experimental exposure indicates the amphibian chytrid
pathogen poses low risk to New Zealand’s threatened endemic frogs. Animal Conservation 16(4): 422–429.
Perfect, A. 1996: Aspects of the ecology of the native frogs Leiopelma archeyi and L. hochstetteri, and the impact of
compound 1080. Unpublished MSc thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington. 167 p.
Perfect, A.J.; Bell, B.D. 2005: Assessment of the impact of 1080 on the native frogs Leiopelma archeyi and L. hochstetteri.
DOC Research & Development Series 209. Department of Conservation, Wellington. 58 p.
Pledger, S. 2011: Analysis and recommendations for Archey’s frog monitoring in Whareorino Forest and the
Coromandel Peninsula. Unpublished report for Waikato Conservancy, Department of Conservation, Hamilton. 24 p.
Pledger, S.; Bell, B. 2008: Statistical methods for a study of the Maud Island frog (Leiopelma pakeka). School of
Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science Research Report Series: 08-07. ISSN 1174-2011. Victoria University
of Wellington, Wellington. www.mcs.vuw.ac.nz
Pledger, S.; Bell, B. 2009: Statistical methods for study of the Maud Island frog (Leiopelma pakeka). Victoria University of
Wellington. 12 p. (unpublished report).
Roelants, K.; Gower, D.J.; Wilkinson, M.; Loader, S.P.; Biju, S.D.; Guillaume, K.; Moriau, L.; Bossuyt, F. 2007: Global patterns
of diversification in the history of modern amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America 104: 887–892.
Shaw, S.D.; Bishop, P.J.; Berger, L.; Skerratt, L.F.; Garland, S.; Gleeson, D.M.; Haigh, A.; Herbert, S.; Speare, R. 2010:
Experimental infection of self-cured Leiopelma archeyi with the amphibian chytrid Batrachochytrium
dendrobatidis. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 92(2–3): 159–163.
Shaw, S.; Haigh, A.; Bishop, P.; Skerratt, L.F.; Speare, R.; Bell, B.D.; Berger, L. 2008: Distribution and prevalence of
Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in New Zealand. Conference Proceedings for the Australasian Wildlife Disease
Association Conference, Kioloa, Australia, 20–27 September 2008.
Threatened Species Recovery Plan 63
35