30.10.2012 Views

Download - Abyssinia Law

Download - Abyssinia Law

Download - Abyssinia Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

www.abyssinialaw.com<br />

Tort law and development<br />

[1996] J.A.L.<br />

work of American law is not an independent variable. Outside American law,<br />

law and economics has a good chance of enriching its understanding by<br />

abandoning a rather parochial attitude and thinking about the institutional<br />

peculiarities of the system it wishes to analyse. 42<br />

Tuming now to consider Ethiopian and Eritrean law with regard to environmental<br />

problems, as in many other African countries, state justice and other<br />

public institutions are very weak 3; that is to say that the modem law layer does<br />

not seem able to govern environmental problems efficiently. However, if this<br />

layer cannot tackle a problem efficiently, one may still be able to find the proper<br />

solution elsewhere, perhaps in customary law with its decentralized hold on the<br />

territory.' Collective property rights are usually combined with an inalienability<br />

rule in favour of future generations and are policed by local chiefs and/or<br />

elders. Thus they appear to many scholars to be projected into the future and<br />

environmentally protective by their very nature. One may add that, at the<br />

customary level, remedies for property-rights violations are focused on reestablishing<br />

social order and are enforced by a high level of social stigma which<br />

may ensure their deterrence role. Customary law, therefore, may guarantee a<br />

rather efficient level of environmental protection at least against smaller injuries.<br />

THE PROPER ROLE OF MODERN TORT LAW IN ETHIoPIA AND ERrTREA<br />

At the risk of sounding ethnocentric, it is suggested that some aspects of the<br />

Western model of tort law are worth retaining as a tool for tackling environmental<br />

problems in Ethiopia and Eritrea. The issue at stake here is the correct level<br />

upon which the different solutions can be grounded. Because of its intrinsic<br />

localism and limited receptivity in the face of technological expertise, customary<br />

law in these two countries seems unable to provide an adequate approach to<br />

the macro-problems of environmental externalities.' Moreover, as is known,<br />

there is a problem of effective enforcement ofjudicial decisions and generally of<br />

state-made rules.<br />

So, in developing countries such as Ethiopia and Eritrea where the modem<br />

layer of the law is not rooted in the local tradition and therefore can be either<br />

chosen (among various models) or rejected, 47 one could, without any cultural<br />

problem, bypass the historical phase that preceded the expansion of negligence<br />

42 On this point compare P. Dasgupta, An Inqui , into Well-being and Destitution, 1993.<br />

43 On these points see the works quoted above, n. 28; and I.S. Fraser, "The administrative<br />

framework for economic development in Ethiopia", (1966) 3 J.E.L 118ff.<br />

1 SeeJ. Clare Mohamed, "Environmental law trends and concerns in Zimbabwe", in I.L. Backer,<br />

H.C. Bugge and A. Helium (eds.), Environment and Development in Developing Countries: National and<br />

International <strong>Law</strong>, Skriftserie, 1994, 15, 20ff.<br />

4s See T.O. Elias, The Nature of African Customary <strong>Law</strong>, Manchester, 1956.<br />

' For some examples of African national statutes tackling pollution, A. Adekunle, Statute Note,<br />

(1992) 36(1)J.A.L. 99ff.<br />

1 We should consider that not all the layers of a stratified legal system are like clothes that can<br />

be worn or taken off as we desire. Indeed, very few of them are. Once a layer has been put on it<br />

cannot be completely removed. It would be impossible for the French or the Italian legal systems,<br />

for instance, to decide overnight to become common law systems. This is because the degree of<br />

resistance of the Civil <strong>Law</strong> tradition is very strong in France and Italy. In stratified legal systems,<br />

not all the layers of legal systems have a degree of resistance comparable to that of the Civil <strong>Law</strong><br />

tradition in France or of the Common <strong>Law</strong> tradition in England. In less developed countries the<br />

modem layer of the legal system (common law or civil law) does not constitute a tradition. Modem<br />

layers are not rooted because of the phenomenon of "duality" to which economics of development<br />

scholars refer. In other words, while a layer of the legal system can be changed (Sudan's shift from<br />

common law to civil law and then to Islamic law is a good example), a legal tradition cannot.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!