KPCC/D/A/149/2012 - Kosovo Property Agency
KPCC/D/A/149/2012 - Kosovo Property Agency
KPCC/D/A/149/2012 - Kosovo Property Agency
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
33<br />
Hidrosistemi Radoniq Sh.a (J.S.C). The cadastral officer confirmed to the Executive<br />
Secretariat that the Cadastre was updated in 2007, changing the name of the Public Water<br />
Supply Company from a Holding Company to Public Water Supply Company K.R.U.<br />
Hidrosistemi Radoniq Sh.a (J.S.C), pursuant to a Transfer Act on the Right of <strong>Property</strong> Right<br />
Holder and Authority over the Immovable <strong>Property</strong> No. 1869 dated 27 July 2007. The<br />
Claimant was contacted by the Executive Secretariat and asked to confirm the date the family<br />
lost possession of the claimed properties. The Claimant replied that she did not know and<br />
that there was no family member alive who possessed the property to answer that question.<br />
The Claimant stated that she did not know any member of the family who lived on or visited<br />
the claimed property before the conflict. The Claimant also indicated that she was not<br />
interested in pursuing the claim any longer, but did not withdraw the claim. The Commission<br />
notes that the Claimant also failed to submit proof of the family relationship between the<br />
property right holder and her son.<br />
144. The Public Water Supply Company K.R.U. Hidrosistemi Radoniq Sh.a (J.S.C) was<br />
contacted by the Executive Secretariat. A representative of the company explained that the<br />
claimed properties were expropriated by the then Hidrosistemi Radoniq in 1978 by decisions<br />
of the Secretariat of Economy and Finance of the Municipality of Gjakovë/Đakovica.<br />
145. Based on the evidence before it, the Commission concludes that the Claimant has<br />
failed to show ownership or any other property right over the claimed properties immediately<br />
prior to or during the 1998-99 conflict.<br />
c. Claim Nos. 26789 and 26792<br />
146. Claim Nos. 26789 and 26792 have been filed by the Claimant in his capacity as a<br />
family household member of the alleged property right holder, namely his father. The<br />
Claimant submitted an old possession list No. 173 from 1938, listing the claimed properties<br />
in the name of the property right holder. However, the Executive Secretariat located ex<br />
officio certificates on the immovable property rights Nos. 72 and 100, which list the property<br />
claimed in Claim No. 26789 in the name of one Milorad Pejcinovic and the property claimed<br />
in Claim No. 26792 in the name of one Arif Kabashi. The Executive Secretariat contacted<br />
the Claimant and informed him of the above. The Claimant confirmed that the claimed<br />
property had been sold before the 1998-99 conflict.<br />
d. Claim Nos. 28546, 28547, 28548, 28549, 28550 and 90952<br />
147. Claim Nos. 28546, 28547, 28548, 28549, 28550 and 90952 have been filed by the<br />
Claimant in her capacity as the property right holder. The Claimant submitted an inheritance<br />
decision O.br. 12/2 dated 30 April 2003, issued by a parallel court in Istog/Istok, pursuant to<br />
which she inherited the claimed properties from her mother-in-law. However, the Executive<br />
Secretariat located ex officio possession list No. 130, listing the claimed properties in the<br />
name of the Claimant’s mother-in-law. The Claimant was contacted by the Executive<br />
Secretariat several times and informed of the verification efforts conducted by the Executive<br />
Secretariat. The Claimant was asked to submit a valid inheritance decision or any additional<br />
documentation to prove her ownership of the claimed property, or a power of attorney from<br />
the inheritors of her mother-in-law, as she does not fall within the definition of family<br />
household member. The Claimant indicated that she would initiate the inheritance<br />
proceedings at a regular court and submit a valid inheritance decision and a power of attorney<br />
from the inheritors of her mother-in-law, however, she failed to do so.