09.04.2014 Views

Pythagorean Teachings across the Centuries - Rosicrucian Order

Pythagorean Teachings across the Centuries - Rosicrucian Order

Pythagorean Teachings across the Centuries - Rosicrucian Order

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of women, among whom was a specially<br />

illustrious person named Theano. He also<br />

drew audiences from among <strong>the</strong> neighboring<br />

barbarians, among whom were magnates and<br />

kings. What he told his audiences cannot be<br />

said with certainty, for he enjoined silence<br />

upon his hearers. However, <strong>the</strong> following is<br />

a matter of general information. He taught<br />

that <strong>the</strong> soul is immortal, and that after<br />

death it transmigrates into o<strong>the</strong>r animated<br />

bodies. After certain specified periods,<br />

he said, <strong>the</strong> same events occur again, for<br />

nothing is entirely new. All animated beings<br />

are kin, he taught, and should be considered<br />

as belonging to one great family. Pythagoras<br />

was <strong>the</strong> first one to introduce <strong>the</strong>se teachings<br />

into Greece.<br />

“His speech was so persuasive that,<br />

according to Nicomachus, in one address<br />

made on first landing in Italy, he made<br />

more than two thousand adherents. Out of<br />

desire to live with him, <strong>the</strong>se built a large<br />

auditorium, to which both women and boys<br />

were admitted. [Foreign visitors were so<br />

many that] <strong>the</strong>y built whole cities, settling<br />

that whole region of Italy now known as<br />

Magna Graecia. His ordinances and laws<br />

were by <strong>the</strong>m received as divine precepts,<br />

and <strong>the</strong>y would do nothing to transgress<br />

<strong>the</strong>m. Indeed, <strong>the</strong>y ranked him among <strong>the</strong><br />

divinities and held all property in common;<br />

and whenever <strong>the</strong>y communicated to each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r some choice bit of his philosophy,<br />

from which physical truths could always be<br />

deduced, <strong>the</strong>y would swear by <strong>the</strong> Tetraktys,<br />

adjuring Pythagoras as a divine witness, in<br />

<strong>the</strong> words,<br />

“I call to witness him who to our souls<br />

expressed <strong>the</strong> Tetraktys, Eternal Nature’s<br />

fountain-spring.” 12<br />

Porphyry emphasized <strong>the</strong> image of<br />

Pythagoras, perhaps even enhancing this<br />

image for his readers. He represented him as<br />

a divine being with extraordinary powers:<br />

“He soo<strong>the</strong>d <strong>the</strong> passions of <strong>the</strong> soul and<br />

body by rhythms, songs, and incantations.<br />

These he adapted and applied to his friends.<br />

He himself could hear <strong>the</strong> Harmony of <strong>the</strong><br />

Universe, and understood <strong>the</strong> universal<br />

music of <strong>the</strong> spheres, and of <strong>the</strong> stars which<br />

move in concert with <strong>the</strong>m, and which we<br />

cannot hear because of <strong>the</strong> limitations of our<br />

weak nature.” 13<br />

With respect to Pythagoras’s teachings,<br />

Porphyry indicateed:<br />

“His utterances were of two kinds,<br />

plain or symbolical. His teaching was<br />

twofold: of his disciples some were called<br />

Students (ma<strong>the</strong>matikoi), and o<strong>the</strong>rs Hearers<br />

(akousmatikoi). The Students learned <strong>the</strong><br />

fuller and more exactly elaborate reasons of<br />

science, while <strong>the</strong> Hearers heard only <strong>the</strong><br />

summarized instructions of learning, without<br />

more detailed explanations.” 14<br />

Iamblichus and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pythagorean</strong> Tradition<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r philosopher who developed <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Pythagorean</strong> teachings was Iamblichus. His<br />

approach was different from Porphyry’s. While<br />

<strong>Rosicrucian</strong><br />

Digest<br />

No. 1<br />

2009<br />

Monfredo de Monte Imperiali,<br />

Imaginary Debate between<br />

Averroes and Porphyry, in Liber<br />

de Herbis, fourteenth century.<br />

Page xxx

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!