11.04.2014 Views

Tunable symmetry and periodicity in binary supramolecular ...

Tunable symmetry and periodicity in binary supramolecular ...

Tunable symmetry and periodicity in binary supramolecular ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Downloaded on 04 March 2011<br />

Published on 01 February 2011 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C0CP02388D<br />

largely overlap, one s<strong>in</strong>gle structure common to both substrate<br />

surfaces cannot be ruled out. However, such case would<br />

decrease the degree of epitaxy with the substrates at least for<br />

one of the overlayers. A similar l<strong>in</strong>ear CuPc–DIP pattern has<br />

been observed on Ag(111), 39 but for this surface the b<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

mixture F 16 CuPc–DIP rema<strong>in</strong>s unexplored <strong>and</strong> a change from<br />

one- to two-dimensional compositional order by controlled<br />

modification of the <strong>in</strong>termolecular <strong>in</strong>teractions has not yet<br />

been proved.<br />

Such film structures with one-dimensional compositional<br />

<strong>periodicity</strong> can be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as phase separation of DIP <strong>and</strong><br />

CuPc <strong>in</strong>to periodically arranged striped doma<strong>in</strong>s (correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the molecular rows). We suggest that, <strong>in</strong> competition with<br />

<strong>in</strong>termolecular <strong>in</strong>teractions (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g steric effects <strong>and</strong> van<br />

der Waals <strong>in</strong>teraction), electrostatic <strong>in</strong>teractions may play<br />

an important role, the latter result<strong>in</strong>g either from <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic<br />

molecular dipoles or from absorption-<strong>in</strong>duced surface dipoles.<br />

Such surface dipoles are responsible for the commonly observed<br />

work function changes of metal surfaces upon molecular<br />

adsorption <strong>and</strong> may largely vary from molecule to molecule,<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g specific to each molecule–substrate <strong>in</strong>terface. 40 Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to previous works, energy m<strong>in</strong>imization by dipole–dipole<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong> b<strong>in</strong>ary systems (with stoichiometries <strong>in</strong> the<br />

range of those used for the present experiments) leads to<br />

segregation <strong>in</strong>to striped phases. 41,42<br />

Thus, although other aspects such as epitaxial relations with<br />

the substrate may play additional important roles <strong>in</strong> the<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g film structure (as discussed above), it seems plausible<br />

to ascribe a decisive role <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>ear molecular arrangements<br />

of these b<strong>in</strong>ary layers to long-range dipole–dipole <strong>in</strong>teractions.<br />

In this context, the shortest possible <strong>periodicity</strong> (alternat<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle molecular rows) po<strong>in</strong>ts to very low phase boundary<br />

energies allow<strong>in</strong>g for maximized dipole–dipole <strong>in</strong>teractions.<br />

However, most important is the fact that a controlled<br />

reduction of the <strong>in</strong>termolecular <strong>in</strong>teractions simply by exchang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

fluor<strong>in</strong>e with hydrogen atoms yields remarkable changes from<br />

two- to one-dimensional periodicities <strong>in</strong> the crystall<strong>in</strong>e<br />

structures.<br />

It is worth not<strong>in</strong>g that a similar attempt was reported on<br />

b<strong>in</strong>ary layers comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g nickel-tetraphenylporphyr<strong>in</strong> (NiTPP)<br />

with the fluor<strong>in</strong>ated (F 16 CoPc) <strong>and</strong> non-fluor<strong>in</strong>ated (CoPc)<br />

cobalt-phthalocyan<strong>in</strong>es. 24 However, the experiment failed to<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d a tunability of the crystall<strong>in</strong>e properties of such layers,<br />

given the disordered nature of the NiTTP–CoPc mixture.<br />

The structures obta<strong>in</strong>ed by modify<strong>in</strong>g the CuPc:DIP stoichiometry<br />

on either surface are further summarized <strong>in</strong> Fig. 3. Be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

already published previous works on s<strong>in</strong>gle component CuPc or<br />

DIP on both surfaces, 43–47 we only focus on b<strong>in</strong>ary layers with<br />

molecular ratios of 2 : 1 <strong>and</strong> 1 : 2. Most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>gly, we f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

that the <strong>periodicity</strong> of the one-dimensional structures can be<br />

tuned via the stoichiometry. For the CuPc : DIP 2 : 1 ratio we<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d the follow<strong>in</strong>g. On Au(111) we either observe phase separation<br />

<strong>in</strong>to pure CuPc <strong>and</strong> b<strong>in</strong>ary 1 : 1 regions, or a disordered<br />

mixture (alternat<strong>in</strong>g double, triple, or higher multiplicity CuPc<br />

rows with those of DIP). However, on Cu(111) the b<strong>in</strong>ary layer<br />

keeps an ordered arrangement of alternat<strong>in</strong>g molecular rows,<br />

now featur<strong>in</strong>g double rows for the CuPc. The result is thus a<br />

highly regular l<strong>in</strong>ear pattern comparable to the 1 : 1 structure<br />

but with an <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>periodicity</strong>.<br />

Fig. 3 14 14 nm 2 STM images of the result<strong>in</strong>g structures for b<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

layers comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g DIP with CuPc with vary<strong>in</strong>g ratios on Au(111) <strong>and</strong><br />

Cu(111) surfaces. For better resolution <strong>in</strong> the 2 : 1 structure image on<br />

Cu(111), an image of the pure DIP region is shown, <strong>and</strong> we refer to the<br />

1 : 1 structure <strong>in</strong> the b<strong>in</strong>ary regions. Marked with grey l<strong>in</strong>es are those<br />

systems lead<strong>in</strong>g to periodic l<strong>in</strong>ear patterns.<br />

A comparable scenario appears for the 2 : 1 ratio, though <strong>in</strong><br />

this case it is on the Cu(111) where we observe phase separation<br />

<strong>in</strong>to pure DIP <strong>and</strong> b<strong>in</strong>ary regions, both of them highly<br />

ordered. 48 Segregation of pure DIP beyond the 1 : 1 stoichiometry<br />

<strong>and</strong> the absence of disordered mixtures with alternat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

molecular rows of r<strong>and</strong>omly vary<strong>in</strong>g multiplicity po<strong>in</strong>t to the<br />

DIP structure as a particularly low energy phase, which alters<br />

the mesoscopic balance of dipole–dipole <strong>and</strong> phase boundary<br />

energies. In contrast, on Au(111) the one-dimensional compositional<br />

order is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed. Now it is the DIP which features<br />

double molecular rows alternat<strong>in</strong>g with those of CuPc. The<br />

presence of s<strong>in</strong>gle DIP rows <strong>in</strong> the STM image is related to a<br />

slightly deviated stoichiometry, but the absence of disorder or<br />

phase separated regions po<strong>in</strong>ts to potentially highly periodic<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ear patterns upon a more precise stoichiometric deposition.<br />

The differences <strong>in</strong> the 1D order<strong>in</strong>g for different stoichiometries<br />

of the CuPc:DIP mixtures on Au(111) <strong>and</strong> Cu(111)<br />

4222 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 4220–4223 This journal is c the Owner Societies 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!