11.04.2014 Views

ESSAY ABOUT THE CCTV - gartagani

ESSAY ABOUT THE CCTV - gartagani

ESSAY ABOUT THE CCTV - gartagani

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>ESSAY</strong> <strong>ABOUT</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>CCTV</strong><br />

in doubt. In which point we are talking about a technological paranoia and total<br />

surveillance society? It is very difficult to draw the line.<br />

In my opinion <strong>CCTV</strong> is necessary to detect criminal and terrorist activities between<br />

the crowds in the big city centers, but a ethical use of those devices must be done,<br />

otherwise we can live in a sort of enforced order, absolutely giving the back any social<br />

trust which indicates an advanced society. That happens because this policy (<strong>CCTV</strong>)<br />

works as a deterrent for criminals in the short term, for specifical offences (property<br />

robberies for example) and can not act in the social and human roots of the problem.<br />

On the other hand, offences are the result of the modern way of life, our system and<br />

our cities as another social interaction and not exactly a social pathology. (9)<br />

It makes no sense to use those devices in small villages or cities. The use of those<br />

devices must be justified by the security of thousands of people or historical buildings.<br />

Only in a few cases is justified (in some private spaces and in the center of big cities if<br />

we are talking about public areas). Unluckily, in UK we have seen a spectacular growth<br />

of <strong>CCTV</strong> systems, more than any other country of Europe.<br />

Has the electronic industry marketing interests in this case? For example, the Home<br />

Office has spent last year close to £50 million on <strong>CCTV</strong> installation in town centres.<br />

Also the council’s budget for these purposes has been increased (example, Bradford,<br />

England) (10)<br />

An automatic recognition done by special software and the capability of the<br />

hardware to store millions of data in small folders and report exactly about our<br />

movements at least is a scarring question. It is exactly the end of the privacy. The<br />

availability of the technology for the private’s enterprises with low costs breaks also<br />

the right of privacy, because the data can be used for non-security purposes<br />

(marketing research, etc). The use of software for facial recognition should not be<br />

allowed for private purposes (to be used with <strong>CCTV</strong> systems).<br />

The technology can not be bad, we must bear in mind that only the ethics and the<br />

way in which they are used those devices in our lives and in our society is the main<br />

matter to be discussed. For example: the Autoscopics is a useful technical achieving<br />

improvements in Psychosocial and Educational Sciences. Also the OCR technology is<br />

essential in the industry chains mainly for the packaging and control of quality: release<br />

humans from a hard work: in this case it is a contribution to the public health.(11)<br />

February 2002<br />

file:///C|/My%20Documents/uniedinburgh/postmodernism/essay.html (6 de 11) [13/03/02 3:51:56]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!