Frame Semantics, Constructions, and the FrameNet Lexical Database

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The SALSA Project • Manfred Pinkal, Universität des Saarlandes • Starts from TIGER German treebank • Adds FrameNet labels to constituents • Own annotation tool, TIGER XML • Where FN frames do not yet exist, creates “unknowns”, annotates somewhat like PropBank
FrameNets in other Languages • Spanish FrameNet: Carlos Subirats, U Autónoma, Barcelona http://gemini.uab.es/SFN • Japanese FrameNet: Kyoko Ohara, Keio U (and others from Tokyo Univ) http://jfn.st.hc.keio.ac.jp • German FrameNet: Hans C. Boas, U Texas, Austin http://gframenet.gmc.utexas.edu/
Page 1 and 2:
Frame Semantics, Constructions, and
Page 3 and 4:
Background
Page 5 and 6:
Fillmore on Frame Semantics • 197
Page 7 and 8:
A Non-lexical Construction
Page 10 and 11:
Embodied Conx Grammar • http://ww
Page 12 and 13:
What is a semantic frame? What do y
Page 14 and 15:
Frame Elements (FEs) • Frame Elem
Page 16 and 17:
LU Definitions • In addition to t
Page 18 and 19:
Placing Frame: FEs • Agent/Cause
Page 20 and 21:
Placing Frame: Annotation • [Euro
Page 22 and 23:
Revenge Frame: Definition • This
Page 24 and 25:
Core FEs • Inherent in the concep
Page 26 and 27:
Extra-thematic FEs • Not actually
Page 28 and 29:
Revenge Frame: Annotation • 1. [T
Page 30 and 31:
Text frame: FEs • Core - Text •
Page 32 and 33:
Text Frame: Annotation • [Shusaku
Page 34 and 35:
Apply heat frame: FEs • Core - Co
Page 36 and 37:
Apply heat frame: Annotation • 1.
Page 38 and 39:
The art of frame definition • Not
Page 40 and 41:
“Vanguarding” • Frames, FEs,
Page 42 and 43:
Annotation • Annotator chooses
Page 44 and 45:
Retaliate: Annotation report
Page 46 and 47:
Representing Frame Semantic Concept
Page 48 and 49:
FE-to-FE relations across frames
Page 50 and 51:
Inheritance • All FEs of parent a
Page 57 and 58:
Using
Page 59 and 60:
Causative of and Inchoative of Caus
Page 61:
What happened to thematic roles?
Page 64 and 65:
Traditional roles don’t fit (2)
Page 66 and 67: FE-to-FE relations within frames (2
Page 68: FN Semantic Types • Ontological t
Page 72 and 73: Full text annotation
Page 74 and 75: In October 2002, the U.S. State Dep
Page 76 and 77: Inform • The meaning of inform th
Page 78 and 79: Other patterns with Telling.inform?
Page 80 and 81: Awareness.aware Cognizer TARGET Con
Page 84 and 85: Regard • Regard, in the Categoriz
Page 86 and 87: Compliance.violation Act Target Nor
Page 90 and 91: Commitment • The noun commitment
Page 92 and 93: Full Text Annotation • Text annot
Page 94 and 95: PropBank • Closest annotation pro
Page 96: NIs and anaphora resolution • The
Page 99 and 100: Automation or Can’t this be done
Page 101 and 102: Frame assignment as WSD • Title o
Page 103 and 104: Shalmaneser • Erk & Padó 2006 LR
Page 105 and 106: "Rapid Vanguarding" • Using princ
Page 109 and 110: Bootstrapping annotation • We are
Page 111 and 112: Information Extraction • Mohit an
Page 113 and 114: Textual Entailment • Aljoscha Bur
Page 115: Related projects
Page 119 and 120: Japanese FrameNet • Own Corpus (2
Page 121 and 122: FrameNets by Projection • English
Page 123 and 124: Soccer FrameNet • Thomas Schmidt,
Page 125 and 126: Linking FN to SUMO • Jan Scheffcz
Page 127 and 128: Data releases • Fifth data releas
show all

Frame Semantics, Constructions, and the FrameNet Lexical Database

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?