16.04.2014 Views

Putting Museums on the Tour... - ICME

Putting Museums on the Tour... - ICME

Putting Museums on the Tour... - ICME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 of 5<br />

However, in ec<strong>on</strong>omically poor countries, especially third world countries, funding of museums is not a priority.<br />

Governments may recognise <strong>the</strong> need to fund museums but <strong>the</strong>y do not take priority over health, educati<strong>on</strong> and o<strong>the</strong>r social<br />

services. As such, <strong>the</strong>y are often under-funded. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, in ec<strong>on</strong>omically c<strong>on</strong>strained countries even local companies and<br />

individuals do not have enough to spare to help fund museums. Such museums <strong>the</strong>refore struggle to survive <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> little<br />

government funding, erratic d<strong>on</strong>or funding, and small amounts of income generated from entrance fees and o<strong>the</strong>r services<br />

and products. As Camara (1992) states, "Financial problems are a major c<strong>on</strong>cern for most African museums due to <strong>the</strong><br />

absence or reducti<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> operating budget."<br />

With c<strong>on</strong>tinuous under-funding, such museums fail to carry out useful research or to maintain <strong>the</strong>ir exhibits. They become<br />

mere galleries, which are not dynamic and are poorly maintained. Visitors still come, but <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>the</strong>y receive is not as<br />

good as it should be, and <strong>the</strong>y do not see any significant change if <strong>the</strong>y return some years later. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, such<br />

museums are slowly "dying".<br />

What is <strong>the</strong> soluti<strong>on</strong>? Government funding is unlikely to increase unless <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omy improves. Private funding is<br />

unreliable. Can tourism be <strong>the</strong> answer?<br />

Can tourism sustain <strong>the</strong> museums?<br />

Using Livingst<strong>on</strong>e Museum, Livingst<strong>on</strong>e, Zambia, as a case study, just over 1% of <strong>the</strong> museum income requirement is<br />

raised through entrance fees, as can be seen in table 1.<br />

Table 1: Comparis<strong>on</strong> of Budget Estimate for Livingst<strong>on</strong>e Museum with Income raised from entrance fees<br />

2000 2001 Average<br />

Total Budget Estimate for Livingst<strong>on</strong>e Museum (excluding<br />

capital budget)<br />

K1.72 billi<strong>on</strong> K2.53 billi<strong>on</strong> K2.12 billi<strong>on</strong><br />

Total income raised through entrance fees K29 milli<strong>on</strong> K32 milli<strong>on</strong> K30.5 milli<strong>on</strong><br />

Income raised from <strong>Tour</strong>ists as a Percentage of Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

1.7% 1.3% 1.44%<br />

Source: Livingst<strong>on</strong>e Museum<br />

Statistics also show that just over 1% of foreign tourists entering Livingst<strong>on</strong>e area enter <strong>the</strong> Livingst<strong>on</strong>e Museum (Ministry<br />

of <strong>Tour</strong>ism, 2000; Ministry of <strong>Tour</strong>ism, 2001; Livingst<strong>on</strong>e Museum, unpubl. visitor statistics).<br />

Comparis<strong>on</strong> of foreign tourists entering Livingst<strong>on</strong>e with visitors entering <strong>the</strong> Livingst<strong>on</strong>e Museum<br />

1999 2000 Average<br />

No of visitors entering Livingst<strong>on</strong>e area via Victoria Falls, Kazungula and<br />

Katima Mulilo border posts and Livingst<strong>on</strong>e Airport<br />

214,430 228,743 221,587<br />

No of foreign visitors entering <strong>the</strong> Livingst<strong>on</strong>e Museum 2,525 3,532 3,029<br />

Percentage of foreign tourists entering <strong>the</strong> area who visit <strong>the</strong> Livingst<strong>on</strong>e<br />

Museum<br />

1.2% 1.5% 1.37%<br />

Source: Ministry of <strong>Tour</strong>ism<br />

In o<strong>the</strong>r words, if all <strong>the</strong> tourists currently entering Livingst<strong>on</strong>e area could be persuaded to visit <strong>the</strong> museum, <strong>the</strong> museum<br />

could be totally funded by tourism.<br />

However, this is not practical for various reas<strong>on</strong>s. Firstly, tourism is an unpredictable business because it relies <strong>on</strong> various<br />

factors including immigrati<strong>on</strong> policies, infrastructure development and political stability. For example, <strong>the</strong> volatile<br />

political situati<strong>on</strong> in Zimbabwe has had a big impact <strong>on</strong> neighbouring Zambian tourism. There was a significant drop in <strong>the</strong><br />

number of foreign visitor arrivals in <strong>the</strong> 1970's during <strong>the</strong> freedom struggle in Zimbabwe. After Zimbabwe's independence<br />

Zambian tourism improved drastically (Ministry of <strong>Tour</strong>ism, 1985). The recent political situati<strong>on</strong> in Zimbabwe has also<br />

had an impact <strong>on</strong> Zambia's tourism. Internati<strong>on</strong>al crises, such as <strong>the</strong> terrorist attacks <strong>on</strong> USA in September 2001, can also

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!