National Dental Inspection Programme of Scotland - Scottish Dental
National Dental Inspection Programme of Scotland - Scottish Dental
National Dental Inspection Programme of Scotland - Scottish Dental
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The importance <strong>of</strong> monitoring the dental health <strong>of</strong> children and being able to make comparisons over a long period<br />
<strong>of</strong> time is illustrated in Figure 4. By viewing the results as a series, rather than making year-on-year comparisons,<br />
the trend in the number <strong>of</strong> decayed, missing and filled teeth (d 3 mft) can be seen. Since the 1990s, the largest<br />
reduction has been in the decayed component (d 3 t).<br />
What proportion <strong>of</strong> obvious decay experience among P1 children was treated with fillings?<br />
The Care Index is used to describe the level <strong>of</strong> restorative care (the number <strong>of</strong> filled teeth divided by the number <strong>of</strong><br />
obviously decayed, missing and filled teeth and multiplied by 100 [(ft/d 3 mft) x 100]).<br />
Figure 5 illustrates the changes in the Care Index over time. For <strong>Scotland</strong> as a whole, only 12.5% <strong>of</strong> teeth with<br />
decay experience have been filled, and there has been some concern expressed that a high level <strong>of</strong> unrestored decay<br />
may indicate a failure in primary dental care provision to this young age group.<br />
20<br />
Figure 5 : Care Index (ft/d 3 mft) for P1 children in <strong>Scotland</strong>, 1988 - 2010<br />
18<br />
16<br />
% <strong>of</strong> caries experience treated restoratively<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
16.5<br />
18.4<br />
13.8<br />
8.1 7.8<br />
8.6<br />
9.4<br />
8.7 8.9 9.2<br />
9.7<br />
12.5<br />
2<br />
0<br />
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2003 2004 2006 2008 2010<br />
While the level <strong>of</strong> NHS dental registration among children is improving, there are still children in P1 who are not<br />
registered with an NHS dental practice. However, the <strong>Scottish</strong> Government and NHS Boards continue to encourage<br />
improvement in this area and, since the recent (April 2010) change in regulations, the registration period <strong>of</strong> all<br />
patients registered with an NHS dentist is non-time limited. This means all existing patients and all new patients are<br />
registered for life, and registration arrangements no longer lapse after a set period.<br />
Projects supported by the NHS in <strong>Scotland</strong>, including locally co-ordinated community health improvement<br />
programmes that promote children’s dental registration, are encouraging parents/carers to seek and maintain<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional dental care for very young children as part <strong>of</strong> a holistic approach to improving children’s health. These<br />
initiatives, funded by the <strong>Scottish</strong> Government, include the promotion <strong>of</strong> toothbrushing with fluoride-containing<br />
toothpaste and healthy eating, together with the application <strong>of</strong> fluoride varnish to the teeth. They are collectively<br />
known as the Childsmile programme and are aimed at establishing a good preventive regime from an early age that<br />
will carry through into adulthood.<br />
Was the prevalence <strong>of</strong> obvious decay experience distributed evenly throughout the population <strong>of</strong> P1 children?<br />
The results shown in Table 3 demonstrate that decay experience was not distributed evenly throughout the P1<br />
population. Some 36% <strong>of</strong> P1 children had 100% <strong>of</strong> the obvious decay experience while an unfortunate 8% had 50%<br />
2010 <strong>National</strong> <strong>Dental</strong> <strong>Inspection</strong> <strong>Programme</strong><br />
10