JOHN F. HARKNESS, Jr., #123390 - Florida State University ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TABLE OF CQNTEN TS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................... PAGES .. TABLE OF CASES AND CITATIONS .......................................... 11 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ................................................ 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND OF THE FACTS .............................. .2 SUMMARYOFARGUMENT ................................................. 8 ARGUMENT POINT I - RESPONDENT’S ARGUMENT THAT HIS LETTER OF JUNE 25,1993 DID NOT RELATE TO THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE REPRESENTATION IS WITHOUT MERIT .................. 10 POINT I1 - THE EVIDENCE WAS OVERWHELMING THAT RESPONDENT KNEW THAT GINA SHERMAN WORKED FOR A REPRESENTED PARTY ...................................... 12 POINT I11 - THE EVIDENCE ESTABLISHED THAT RESPONDENT KNOWINGLY COMMUNICATED WITH MR. GARCIA’SCLIENT ............................................ 15 POINT IV - SUMMARY DENIAL OF RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING WAS NOT IMPROPER NOR WAS THERE ERROR IN THE AWARD OF COSTS .............................. 17 POINT V - THE RECOMMENDED DISCIPLINE IS APPROPRIATE ............................................... 19 CONCLUSION ............................................................ 21 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ............................................... .21 i 1
LE OF CASESAND CITATIONS CASES 1. The Florida Bar v. Hoope f, 507 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 1987) .................................... 12, 19 2. The Florb Bar v. Pahules, 233 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 1970). ....................................... 19 3. The Florida Bar v. ir , 413 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 1982) ....................................... 19 4. The Flo& Bar v. Vannie r, 498 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 1986) ........................................ 12 5. The Florida Bar v. W h, 593 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 1992) ....................................... 17 STANDARDS a [NG A’ TA LA W Y IBSANC TIONS 1. Standard 6.32 ........................................................ 19 2. Standard 9.22(f) .................................................... 3,20 3. Standard 9.22(g) ................................................... 3,2O 4. Standard 9.22(i) .................................................... 3,2O RULES D E RULES REGUJATING THE FLORID A BAS 1. Rule 3-7.6(0) ........................................................ .9 2. Rule 3-7.6(0)(2) ...................................................... 17 3. Rule 3-7.6(0)(3) ...................................................... 18 4. R~le4-4.2 .................................................. 2, 10, 15, 16 .. 11
Page 1: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE
Page 5 and 6: a STATEMENT 0 F THE CASE AND OF THE
Page 7 and 8: a Illes, a minor, in which Attorney
Page 9 and 10: Florida attorneys with respect to y
Page 11 and 12: SUMMARY OF ARG- I. RESPONDENT’S A
Page 13 and 14: BGUMENT I. RESPONDENT’S ARGUMENT
Page 15 and 16: II. THE EVIDENCE WAS OVERWHELMING T
Page 17 and 18: 0 had no idea who Gina Sherman was.
Page 19 and 20: dealt with on behalf of First Natio
Page 21 and 22: The referee shall have discretion t
Page 23 and 24: 9.22(f) submission of false evidenc

JOHN F. HARKNESS, Jr., #123390 - Florida State University ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?