Stakeholder Engagement Report - London Councils
Stakeholder Engagement Report - London Councils
Stakeholder Engagement Report - London Councils
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SUMMARY<br />
1. Overarching submissions<br />
Nineteen submissions focused on strategic priorities or overarching considerations with<br />
regard to commissioning HIV preventative services in <strong>London</strong>.<br />
• The strongest theme to emerge from these submissions is that the commissioning<br />
of <strong>London</strong>’s HIV prevention services should be integrated and strategic.<br />
• Different HIV prevention approaches should not be seen as competing or mutually<br />
exclusive, but should be interdependent and mutually reinforcing. Moreover, no<br />
one approach is likely to be sufficient in isolation to reduce HIV transmission.<br />
• The aim of community approaches should not be solely to<br />
increase access to clinical services but also, to address the<br />
factors contributing to HIV exposure and transmission.<br />
• The range of approaches available to reduce HIV transmission might therefore<br />
be articulated under a strategic plan that states overarching aims roles etc.<br />
• HIV prevention should be carried out with the consent<br />
and ownership of the communities involved.<br />
• Both <strong>London</strong>-wide and borough level commissioning are appropriate and<br />
could be considered to have complementary roles. Some suggestions were<br />
made regarding the different roles of each level of commissioning.<br />
• Several submissions warned against boroughs acting entirely in<br />
isolation around HIV prevention stressing that there should be a clear<br />
rationale for carrying out prevention on a local level and that local work<br />
should reflect overarching <strong>London</strong>-wide approaches and goals.<br />
• <strong>London</strong>’s role as a global city attracting visitors and migrants will have a<br />
major impact on epidemiology and HIV burden of HIV. These considerations<br />
would need to be incorporated into any HIV prevention plan.<br />
• There is a need for HIV prevention at several different levels: general<br />
population, HIV risk groups and sub-populations within risk groups.<br />
• There are opportunities for boroughs to integrate HIV prevention into<br />
pre-existing policy and services. Examples cited included Environmental<br />
Health and Trading Standards Departments, Drug Action Teams,<br />
Education, Housing and Social Care. Interventions in these areas<br />
would address some of the ‘upstream drivers’ of the epidemic.<br />
There were strong concerns from some submissions regarding recent rises in HIV<br />
infections in <strong>London</strong> amongst MSM. Two interpretations regarding what factors may<br />
be driving these rises were offered. The first concerns the rise of recreational drug use<br />
within the context of sex. The second relates to the decreasing spend on HIV prevention<br />
over the last number of years.<br />
41