02.05.2014 Views

Accreditation and Designation User Manual - OECI

Accreditation and Designation User Manual - OECI

Accreditation and Designation User Manual - OECI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 Introduction of the <strong>OECI</strong> A&D Programme<br />

The Organisation of European Cancer Institutes<br />

The mission of the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (<strong>OECI</strong>) is to bring together the cancer research<br />

<strong>and</strong> care institutions in the European Union, in order to create a critical mass of expertise <strong>and</strong> competence. With<br />

the view of building <strong>and</strong> maintaining a consensus on the best models of oncology, developing concrete affordable<br />

<strong>and</strong> realistic solutions to effectively combat cancer <strong>and</strong> fostering the widest deployment of oncology models <strong>and</strong><br />

solutions to improve the quality of life for the patients in the EU.<br />

Background of the accreditation programme<br />

The <strong>OECI</strong> launched the <strong>Accreditation</strong> Programme in 2002 to fulfil its goals:<br />

– To provide cancer patients within Europe an equal access to high quality of cancer care.<br />

− Helping European cancer institutes to implement a quality system for oncology care using the <strong>OECI</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

<strong>and</strong> peer review system.<br />

There have been two rounds of pilot projects in eight different cancer institutes between 2006 <strong>and</strong> 2008. In the<br />

first round four cancer institutes used a tool for self-assesment. In the second round four other cancer institutes<br />

were involved to use the improved self-assesment tool <strong>and</strong> a team of auditors visited three of the institutes<br />

for an assessment (peer review) on site. The pilot projects resulted in improvement <strong>and</strong> development of the<br />

accreditation programme, the electronic self-assesment tool, <strong>and</strong> validation of the quality st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />

The programme has been launched in October 2008.<br />

<strong>OECI</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ards describe the dem<strong>and</strong>s the quality system has to meet <strong>and</strong> what has to be arranged. The <strong>OECI</strong><br />

accreditation programme is based upon the <strong>OECI</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards for high qualitative cancer care. The st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

are validated through the pilot projects. The st<strong>and</strong>ards are translated in two questionnaires, a qualitative <strong>and</strong> a<br />

quantitative, to assess the current quality in a cancer institute. Both are integrated in an electronic tool (e-tool)<br />

for self-assesment.<br />

The content of the questionnaires is accessible on the website: http://oeci.selfassessment.nu/cms/node/53<br />

<strong>OECI</strong> peer review visit<br />

An <strong>OECI</strong> peer review is a systematic <strong>and</strong> independent examination to determine: whether on a level of quality <strong>and</strong><br />

the coherent results, activities correspond to the planned measures, <strong>and</strong> whether these measures are suitable<br />

<strong>and</strong> have been effectively implemented to achieve the objectives of the organisation.<br />

The peer review applies to the quality system of the organisation or its elements. The added value of a peer<br />

review is that it should lead to improvement of the quality system, working process <strong>and</strong> products <strong>and</strong> services of<br />

the organisation. It puts the daily routine <strong>and</strong> its results to the test of quality st<strong>and</strong>ards. If differences are found,<br />

corrective measures are taken to upgrade the quality system. Though, it is not solely a compulsory activity.<br />

On the other h<strong>and</strong>, a peer review does not aim to assault the quality system of the cancer institute <strong>and</strong> those<br />

responsible.<br />

Scoring system<br />

A scoring system is included in the qualitative questionnaire. The scoring system is based on the Plan-Do-Check-<br />

Act-circle or Deming-circle. With the scoring system it is possible to assess the stage of development for each<br />

item in the st<strong>and</strong>ard. After filling out all the questions, the e-tool generates the results. The results will be used for<br />

the content of the peer review as well as input for a quality improvement plan of the institute.<br />

Background of the designation programme<br />

The developments in accreditation have urged the <strong>OECI</strong> to develop <strong>and</strong> implement an additional system in which<br />

European cancer institutes can also be designated from September 2010 onwards. Such a system creates a<br />

platform in which synchronization <strong>and</strong> benchmarking of cancer activities will be possible on an international scale.<br />

Additionally, it is a tool for cancer institutes to ensure <strong>and</strong> improve their quality level.<br />

By making an effort to gain a designation status, the organisation will be stimulated to disseminate knowledge<br />

<strong>and</strong> to form coalitions with other institutes in Europe that are also designated. This allows cancer institutes to<br />

benefit from one another <strong>and</strong> to reach a critical mass in cancer services.<br />

Owner: <strong>OECI</strong> Organisation of European Cancer Institutes<br />

Status: Revised - 24 th January 2011 - A&D Working Group<br />

Approved by: <strong>OECI</strong> <strong>Accreditation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Designation</strong> Board<br />

Chapter 1 Introduction of the <strong>OECI</strong> A&D Programme<br />

Page 1 of 2<br />

Version 16 February 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!