05.05.2014 Views

Presidential Candidate Viability & Partisan Online ... - Omnifoo.info

Presidential Candidate Viability & Partisan Online ... - Omnifoo.info

Presidential Candidate Viability & Partisan Online ... - Omnifoo.info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Huntsma Santoru Bachman<br />

Gingric<br />

Johnson n<br />

m n Perry Paul h Romney Cain Total<br />

319 49300 988 277000 31700 133000 154000 242000 31200 919507<br />

Obama Nader Barr Palin<br />

C.<br />

Christie<br />

Paul<br />

Ryan<br />

J.<br />

Bieber<br />

K.Kard<br />

106000 1180 353 55800 915 9170 188000 25800<br />

Fig. 1: Number of articles on the site www.foxnews.com mentioning a particular person in the year up to November 2011. The top<br />

row lists 2012 Republican primary candidates, while the bottom lists others of interest to make comparisons and keep the numbers in<br />

perspective. Note that the “Total” at the end of the first row is the sum of the articles on primary candidates only, used to approximate<br />

the total number of articles about the 2012 Republican primary candidates within a particular website. Undoubtedly there is some<br />

overlap within this Total, with multiple candidates often mentioned within the same article counting as more than one in the Total.<br />

Again, the detailed search protocol may be found in APPENDIX B.<br />

Each person’s number of articles was divided by the Total (919,507) to give the percentage of articles<br />

mentioning a particular person as a portion of all articles mentioning any 2012 Republican Primary candidate<br />

in this website. Again, for Fox News, this division yielded the following proportions:<br />

Johnson% Hunts%<br />

Santorum<br />

% Bach% Perry% Paul% Romney% Gingrich% Cain%<br />

0.03% 5.36% 0.11% 30.12% 3.45% 14.46% 26.32% 16.75% 3.39%<br />

Obama% Nader% Barr% Palin% Christie% Ryan% Entertainment%<br />

9.70% 0.11% 0.03% 6.07% 0.10% 1% 19.56%<br />

Fig. 2: Articles on www.foxnews.com mentioning a particular person, as a percentage of the Total number of articles mentioning any<br />

2012 Republican Primary candidate. Note that percentages were calculated slightly differently for Nader and Barr, for the two<br />

entertainment figures whose numbers were combined as the “Entertainment %”.<br />

This calculation was repeated in Excel for each site in the survey. Space constraints prevent much discussion of<br />

how this particular source differed from the mean or from particular sites, but it should be noted that Fox’s<br />

coverage was surprisingly atypical of conservative sites overall. 24<br />

The New York Times, in an article on the<br />

increase in candidate television appearances accompanied by a reducing in-person campaign stops, notes that<br />

Herman Cain actually led all candidates in appearances on Fox News, followed by Newt Gingrich, though<br />

Santorum’s win in Iowa leads one to question whether a talking head can replace a handshake. 25<br />

24 Compared to the mean for conservative sites, it was very high on Bachmann, Huntsman, and Romney, short on Santorum, Perry, Paul,<br />

and Cain, while also covering Palin, Christie, Ryan, and Obama all considerably less. Relating these data directly to the central<br />

contention of this paper, it would be assumed that, among Fox News consumers nationwide (assuming they are consuming factual<br />

<strong>info</strong>rmation) Michele Bachmann was probably a much better known candidate than Rick Santorum for most of the year leading up to<br />

Iowa, despite each having similar platforms and a later reversal of familiarity and perceived viability as Santorum surged from behind.<br />

Also, as a broadcast news network, Fox had nearly five times more coverage of the two entertainers than any of its fellow U.S.<br />

networks like ABC, CBS, and NBC.<br />

25 See Zeleny.<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!