09.05.2014 Views

Status Update on Food Irradiation - Organic Consumers Association

Status Update on Food Irradiation - Organic Consumers Association

Status Update on Food Irradiation - Organic Consumers Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ecomes rancid quickly). The fact that fats become rancid quickly explains why nuts are not approved for<br />

irradiati<strong>on</strong> in the U.S.<br />

<strong>Organic</strong> foods cannot be irradiated. But the term "natural" for foods does not exclude irradiati<strong>on</strong>. Some<br />

nutriti<strong>on</strong>al supplement ingredients like garlic are irradiated.<br />

Possible additi<strong>on</strong>al foods that will be approved for irradiati<strong>on</strong> in the U.S.<br />

The FDA is c<strong>on</strong>sidering allowing irradiati<strong>on</strong> for deli meats, frozen foods, prepared fresh foods (like<br />

prepackaged shredded carrots), and fresh juices. The FDA will probably approve this petiti<strong>on</strong> in Spring or<br />

Summer 2002.<br />

The FDA is c<strong>on</strong>sidering allowing irradiati<strong>on</strong> of crustaceans and mollusks.<br />

The USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspecti<strong>on</strong> Service (APHIS) is c<strong>on</strong>sidering allowing irradiati<strong>on</strong> for<br />

imported fruits and vegetables. The irradiati<strong>on</strong> could be d<strong>on</strong>e in the U.S. or in the country of origin.<br />

The FDA is reviewing comments <strong>on</strong> a food industry-sp<strong>on</strong>sored proposal to allow foods processed with new<br />

technologies (e.g., filtrati<strong>on</strong>, high pressure) to be labeled as fresh. (Fruits and vegetables irradiated up to the<br />

FDA maximum dose are already allowed to be labeled as "fresh"!)<br />

Upcoming regulatory changes for labeling<br />

In February 1999, the FDA asked for public comments <strong>on</strong> a proposal to change the labeling requirements<br />

for all irradiated foods. It is currently writing the regulati<strong>on</strong>. The FDA will ask the public for comments<br />

again, by end of 2002. Every<strong>on</strong>e should comment <strong>on</strong> the proposed regulati<strong>on</strong> when it is released!<br />

Please c<strong>on</strong>tact us so we can notify you!<br />

Who's resp<strong>on</strong>sible for irradiati<strong>on</strong> policy?<br />

The FDA is resp<strong>on</strong>sible for evaluati<strong>on</strong> of the 'science' <strong>on</strong> whether or not irradiati<strong>on</strong> is harmful (as it does for<br />

new drugs). It is also resp<strong>on</strong>sible for deciding the permitted doses of irradiati<strong>on</strong> and labeling requirements<br />

for n<strong>on</strong>meat products.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>gress tells the FDA what should be regulated, and the FDA implements C<strong>on</strong>gress’s directives, for<br />

example, “make a label that is not threatening to the c<strong>on</strong>sumer.”<br />

The USDA is resp<strong>on</strong>sible for deciding the permitted doses of irradiati<strong>on</strong> and labeling requirements for meat,<br />

poultry and their products.<br />

No law prevents states from passing their own labeling laws, but in practice their right to label (under<br />

Amendment X to the C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>) has c<strong>on</strong>sistently been overturned IF the labeling 'impeded' interstate<br />

commerce. Only in unusual cases should we expect a state-level labeling law to survive legal challenges<br />

from businesses that operate interstate.<br />

What you can do:<br />

1. C<strong>on</strong>gress tells the FDA what to do. Please c<strong>on</strong>tact your member of C<strong>on</strong>gress and say that you d<strong>on</strong>’t want<br />

food to be irradiated, but if it is, you want clear and prominent labels <strong>on</strong> ALL irradiated foods. Also, you<br />

d<strong>on</strong>’t want misleading terms like “pasteurizati<strong>on</strong>” used instead of “irradiati<strong>on</strong>.”<br />

2. C<strong>on</strong>tact OCA to be notified when the FDA asks for comments <strong>on</strong> the new labels it will propose for<br />

irradiated foods by end of 2002. Also c<strong>on</strong>tact us if you want any other informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

3. Tell your grocer (use a comment card) you d<strong>on</strong>’t want to eat irradiated foods.<br />

4. Set up a public educati<strong>on</strong> table about irradiati<strong>on</strong> at food or health festivals. C<strong>on</strong>tact us for flyers and<br />

informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

5. Subscribe to the radfood list: Send an email to npetrie@citizen.org with the words "subscribe radfood" in<br />

the subject line. This is an e-mail list of news and acti<strong>on</strong> alerts (about 2/week).<br />

<strong>Organic</strong> C<strong>on</strong>sumers Associati<strong>on</strong><br />

6771 South Silver Hill Drive - Finland, MN 55603 USA - 218-226-4164<br />

www.organicc<strong>on</strong>sumers.org - email: office@organicc<strong>on</strong>sumers.org - 218-353-7652 fax<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Status</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Update</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Food</strong> Irradiati<strong>on</strong> page 2 of 2 February 2002<br />

<strong>Organic</strong> C<strong>on</strong>sumers Associati<strong>on</strong> http://www.organicc<strong>on</strong>sumers.org/irradlink.html

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!