PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) - Perfusion.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Opening Thought “An experiment is ethical or not at its If inception; a study is it unethical does not to become start with, ethical it does post not hoc become – ends do ethical not justify because the it produces means. There useful is results. no ethical distinction between ends and means.” Ethics and clinical research Henry Beecher, 1966, NEJM Vol.274,24,367 -372
Objectives • Improve understanding of ethical research. • Describe the “Gelsinger”case and publications that illustrate the impact of unethical research. • Review Research Ethics references in AmSECT documents and benchmark journals. • Show that written standards are not enough. • Suggest improving Research Ethics education for Perfusionists.
Page 1: David S Edgell, BA, MHSc, CCP, CPC
Page 5 and 6: Nuremberg Code - 1947 •“Doctors
Page 7 and 8: A good place to start! For help wri
Page 9 and 10: Perfusion projects lend themselves
Page 11 and 12: When Do I Require Ethics Approval?
Page 13 and 14: Scientific Misconduct takes various
Page 15 and 16: A significant proportion of journal
Page 17 and 18: What about our benchmark journals?
Page 19 and 20: Case from the literature “Gene Th
Page 21 and 22: What has this got to do with Perfus
Page 23 and 24: Heart Ache • “We are just resea
Page 25: Conclusion •Ethical research prac

PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) - Perfusion.com

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?