Newsletter - Office of the Controller, City of Philadelphia, Controller ...
Newsletter - Office of the Controller, City of Philadelphia, Controller ...
Newsletter - Office of the Controller, City of Philadelphia, Controller ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Controller</strong>’s Forensic Investigation <strong>of</strong> Sheriff’s <strong>Office</strong>:<br />
Criminal Charges Filed<br />
After <strong>the</strong> Sheriff’s <strong>Office</strong> failed to provide<br />
financial records worth $53 million during<br />
a departmental audit, <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>Controller</strong><br />
launched a precedent forensic investigation<br />
that uncovered numerous questionable<br />
financial transactions and fraudulent activity<br />
within <strong>the</strong> Sheriff’s Real Estate Division.<br />
From 2005 to 2010, <strong>the</strong> Sheriff’s <strong>Office</strong><br />
paid a vendor $206 million for advertising<br />
services, settlement “pass-through”<br />
disbursements, o<strong>the</strong>r related services and<br />
fees. The vendor was <strong>the</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
director <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sheriff’s Real Estate Division<br />
and bro<strong>the</strong>r-in law to <strong>the</strong> supervisor <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> same division.<br />
Under two near-identical, but different,<br />
signed contracts between <strong>the</strong> Sheriff’s<br />
<strong>Office</strong> and <strong>the</strong> vendor, <strong>the</strong> vendor<br />
overcharged <strong>the</strong> Sheriff’s <strong>Office</strong> between<br />
$7.4 million and $11.6 million for<br />
advertising services.<br />
“The Sheriff’s <strong>Office</strong> abandoned its responsibility<br />
to protect <strong>the</strong> public’s interest by allowing<br />
private parties to improperly benefit financially<br />
at <strong>the</strong> expense <strong>of</strong> individuals and families<br />
who lost <strong>the</strong>ir homes through foreclosure,”<br />
said <strong>Controller</strong> Butkovitz.<br />
Due to a lack <strong>of</strong> proper oversight, some <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Sheriff’s <strong>Office</strong> overcharges made to<br />
<strong>the</strong> vendor included <strong>the</strong> following:<br />
• $2.9 million for posting properties on a<br />
website from 2005 to 2010<br />
• $1.1 million for advertising that was never<br />
paid to newspapers for publishing ads<br />
• $616,728 in 2010 for unpaid gas bills on<br />
273 auctioned <strong>of</strong>f Sheriff’s properties<br />
The investigation also uncovered six suspicious<br />
checks totaling $389,742 to three companies<br />
with little or no connection to <strong>the</strong> Sheriff’s<br />
<strong>Office</strong>, which included an antique dealer located<br />
outside <strong>the</strong> city and a sports and entertainment<br />
management services company that caters to<br />
<strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> high-pr<strong>of</strong>ile individuals.<br />
The <strong>Controller</strong>’s forensic investigation was<br />
turned over to <strong>the</strong> U.S. Attorney’s <strong>Office</strong><br />
where in less than a month criminal charges<br />
were filed against four individuals; one was<br />
an employee in <strong>the</strong> accounting department <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Sheriff’s <strong>Office</strong>. All four were charged<br />
with wire fraud as <strong>the</strong>y operated a scam<br />
that bilked <strong>the</strong> Sheriff’s <strong>Office</strong> for more<br />
than $400,000. The U.S. Attorney’s<br />
investigation is still ongoing.<br />
At <strong>the</strong> onset <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forensic audit, three<br />
upper-staff members responsible for Sheriff’s<br />
sales and overseeing <strong>the</strong> financial records<br />
for <strong>the</strong> Sheriff’s <strong>Office</strong> were terminated.<br />
The vendor was also terminated.<br />
The <strong>Controller</strong>’s forensic audit was <strong>the</strong> first<br />
ever conducted for any city department or<br />
agency by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Philadelphia</strong> <strong>City</strong><br />
<strong>Controller</strong>’s <strong>Office</strong>.<br />
page 2