22.05.2014 Views

Motion Brief - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry

Motion Brief - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry

Motion Brief - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 51 -<br />

APPENDIX “A”<br />

Discussion of Evidence of Bruce Rivers<br />

1. Mr. Rivers argues that, in the Ontario cases upon which he comments, the death<br />

of children in care followed by inquests put the child welfare system “out of balance”,<br />

resulting in the apprehension of more children and a greater load on the system.<br />

2. Bruce Rivers describes his observations in Ontario following 6 to 8 coroners<br />

inquests into child deaths in Ontario which took place in the late 1990’s and<br />

proceedings of a Child Mortality task force during the same period.<br />

Affidavit of Bruce Rivers, paras 3 and 9<br />

3. In paragraphs 14 to 16 of his affidavit Mr. Rivers testified that the public attention<br />

flowing from the inquests and the task force, together with changes in the law flowing<br />

from the inquests and task force resulted in a greater number of reports of children in<br />

need of protection, more children taken into care. In paragraphs 17 through 25 he<br />

suggests that the increased pressure and public scrutiny on the system led to more<br />

difficulty recruiting social workers, foster parents and volunteers and made it more<br />

difficult to raise funds.<br />

4. Mr. Rivers connects negative outcomes to the entire process of surrounding the<br />

deaths, inquests, task force, recommendations and resulting legal changes.<br />

His

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!