Motion Brief - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry
Motion Brief - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry
Motion Brief - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
- 51 -<br />
APPENDIX “A”<br />
Discussion of Evidence of Bruce Rivers<br />
1. Mr. Rivers argues that, in the Ontario cases upon which he comments, the death<br />
of children in care followed by inquests put the child welfare system “out of balance”,<br />
resulting in the apprehension of more children and a greater load on the system.<br />
2. Bruce Rivers describes his observations in Ontario following 6 to 8 coroners<br />
inquests into child deaths in Ontario which took place in the late 1990’s and<br />
proceedings of a Child Mortality task force during the same period.<br />
Affidavit of Bruce Rivers, paras 3 and 9<br />
3. In paragraphs 14 to 16 of his affidavit Mr. Rivers testified that the public attention<br />
flowing from the inquests and the task force, together with changes in the law flowing<br />
from the inquests and task force resulted in a greater number of reports of children in<br />
need of protection, more children taken into care. In paragraphs 17 through 25 he<br />
suggests that the increased pressure and public scrutiny on the system led to more<br />
difficulty recruiting social workers, foster parents and volunteers and made it more<br />
difficult to raise funds.<br />
4. Mr. Rivers connects negative outcomes to the entire process of surrounding the<br />
deaths, inquests, task force, recommendations and resulting legal changes.<br />
His