23.05.2014 Views

Kirtley and Tsuei - Physics

Kirtley and Tsuei - Physics

Kirtley and Tsuei - Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

998 C. C. <strong>Tsuei</strong> <strong>and</strong> J. R. <strong>Kirtley</strong>: Pairing symmetry in cuprate superconductors<br />

dominantly d-wave pair state in several cuprate superconductors;<br />

but is it universal? There exists considerable<br />

theoretical work suggesting that the stability of the<br />

d-wave pair state depends on the details of the electronic<br />

b<strong>and</strong> structure as well as the pairing potential<br />

(Wheatley <strong>and</strong> Xiang, 1993; Dagotto, 1994; O’Donovan<br />

<strong>and</strong> Carbotte, 1995a, 1995b; Koltenbah <strong>and</strong> Joynt, 1997;<br />

T. Sakai et al., 1997; Wysokinski, 1997; Varelogiannis,<br />

1998a, 1998b). Given both s-wave <strong>and</strong> d-wave pairing<br />

channels, the general conclusion of these studies is that<br />

pairing symmetry is a function of b<strong>and</strong> filling <strong>and</strong> certain<br />

b<strong>and</strong> parameters. Based on the t-t-J model, with t/t<br />

0.4, the d-wave pair state prevails in a doping range<br />

centered around half-filling of the b<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> s-wave-like<br />

pairing is more stable in the under- <strong>and</strong> over-doped regimes<br />

(Wheatley <strong>and</strong> Xiang, 1993; O’Donovan <strong>and</strong> Carbotte,<br />

1995a; Koltenbah <strong>and</strong> Joyut, 1997). There are<br />

some Raman data on Bi-2212 <strong>and</strong> Tl-2201 as a function<br />

of oxygen content suggesting that the gap is d wave near<br />

optimal doping <strong>and</strong> isotropic in the overdoped range<br />

(Kendziora et al., 1996). Like many other indirect symmetry<br />

experiments, such an interpretation of the results<br />

is controversial. For an alternative point of view, see<br />

Hewitt et al. (1997).<br />

It has been suggested that as the temperature decreases<br />

below a certain characteristic value, a pure<br />

d-wave pair state is not stable against the formation of<br />

mixed pair states such as d x 2 y 2is or d x 2 y 2id xy<br />

(Kotliar, 1988; Laughlin, 1994, 1998; Liu et al., 1997;<br />

Ghosh <strong>and</strong> Adhikari, 1998a, 1998b; Zhu et al., 1998; Zhu<br />

<strong>and</strong> Ting, 1998). Due to the coupling between the two<br />

subcomponents of the order parameter, the mixed pair<br />

state is fully gapped, much like that in an s-wave superconductor<br />

(Ghosh <strong>and</strong> Adhikari, 1998a, 1998b). The<br />

power-law temperature dependence of observables such<br />

as specific heat, thermal conductivity, <strong>and</strong> penetration<br />

depth characteristic of d-wave superconductors reverts<br />

to the exponential behavior typical of s-wave superconductors.<br />

Measurements of the penetration depth of Znsubstituted<br />

LSCO (Karpińska et al., 2000) shows that it<br />

retains a T 2 dependence, indicative of d-wave pairing in<br />

the presence of scattering, until T c is suppressed to zero.<br />

This argues against an admixture of s-wave pairing at<br />

any T c . There has been a report of a temperaturedependent<br />

pair state with broken time-reversal symmetry<br />

(i.e., d x 2 y 2is state) in YBCO near T c (Koren<br />

et al., 1998). The gap anisotropy in Bi-2212 measured by<br />

ARPES also suggests a temperature-dependent twocomponent<br />

order parameter with only a d x 2 y 2 symmetry<br />

component near T c <strong>and</strong> both s- <strong>and</strong> d-wave components<br />

at lower temperatures (Ma et al., 1995).<br />

Furthermore, there is thermal transport evidence suggesting<br />

that a phase transition from a pure d x 2 y 2-wave<br />

state into states of broken time-reversal symmetry such<br />

as dis or d x 2 y 2id xy can be induced in Bi-2212 at<br />

low temperatures by magnetic field (Krishana et al.,<br />

1997) or by magnetic impurities (Movshovich et al.,<br />

1998). However, there are new experiments (Aubin<br />

et al., 1998, 1999; Krishana et al., 1998) <strong>and</strong> calculations<br />

(Anderson, 1998) indicating that the interpretation of<br />

the original experiments is much more involved.<br />

In view of these interesting but controversial results, it<br />

is worthwhile to examine the universality issue by performing<br />

phase-sensitive symmetry experiments with different<br />

superconducting cuprate systems, <strong>and</strong> as a function<br />

of composition (doping) <strong>and</strong> temperature for a<br />

given cuprate system.<br />

1. Hole-doped cuprates<br />

As shown in Table IV, evidence for predominantly<br />

d-wave pairing has been found in all the hole-doped cuprate<br />

superconductors tested using phase-sensitive<br />

methods. This is generally consistent with the numerical<br />

studies of b<strong>and</strong> structure which address the form of pairing<br />

symmetry. As mentioned above, the d-wave channel<br />

is favored near half-filling. More phase-sensitive symmetry<br />

experiments are needed in the under- <strong>and</strong> overdoped<br />

regimes to fully test the universality issue. The interpretation<br />

of symmetry experiments with twinned YBCO<br />

single crystals or films depends on the exact nature of<br />

the twin boundaries (Annett et al., 1996; Walker, 1996).<br />

However, phase-sensitive experiments with a tetragonal<br />

cuprate superconductor such as Tl-2201 (<strong>Tsuei</strong> et al.,<br />

1996, 1997) <strong>and</strong> untwinned YBCO samples (Wollman<br />

et al., 1993; Brawner <strong>and</strong> Ott, 1994) make such complications<br />

irrelevant. The fact that a d-wave signature has<br />

been consistently <strong>and</strong> reproducibly observed in both<br />

orthorhombic <strong>and</strong> tetragonal cuprates argues strongly<br />

that the twin boundaries in YBCO have odd reflection<br />

symmetry (Walker, 1996). The d-wave component of<br />

the order parameter continues across the twin boundary,<br />

whereas the s-wave counterpart changes its sign. An<br />

even-reflection twin boundary corresponds to a predominantly<br />

s-wave pair state, which is not observed in<br />

any of the YBCO experiments listed in Table IV.<br />

2. Electron-doped cuprates<br />

Non-phase-sensitive symmetry tests have been contradictory<br />

in the electron-doped cuprate superconductors<br />

Nd 1.85 Ce 0.15 CuO 4 (NCCO) <strong>and</strong> Pr 1.85 Ce 0.15 CuO 4<br />

(PCCO). For example, the in-plane penetration depth<br />

ab (T) in NCCO has been fit both with an exponential<br />

temperature dependence (Wu et al., 1993; Andreone<br />

et al., 1994; Anlage et al., 1994; Alff et al., 1999), indicating<br />

s-wave symmetry, <strong>and</strong> a power-law dependence<br />

(Kokales et al., 2000; Prozorov et al., 2000), indicating a<br />

symmetry with a line of nodes. The penetration depth<br />

measurements in these materials are complicated by the<br />

fact that they likely have large impurity scattering, which<br />

tends to change ab (T) from a T to a T 2 temperature<br />

dependence in a superconductor with a line of nodes<br />

(Annett et al., 1991; Hirschfeld <strong>and</strong> Goldenfeld, 1993),<br />

<strong>and</strong> by the paramagnetism of Nd 3 ions in NCCO (Cooper,<br />

1996). Similarly, penetration depth measurements<br />

of PCCO have been interpreted as indicating either an<br />

s-wave (Alff et al., 1999) or non-s-wave (Kokales et al.,<br />

2000; Prozorov et al., 2000) pairing symmetry. Quasiparticle<br />

tunneling measurements in NCCO (Huang et al.,<br />

Rev. Mod. Phys., Vol. 72, No. 4, October 2000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!