27.05.2014 Views

LOSING THE DETECTIVES: VIEWS FROM THE ... - Police Federation

LOSING THE DETECTIVES: VIEWS FROM THE ... - Police Federation

LOSING THE DETECTIVES: VIEWS FROM THE ... - Police Federation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 4<br />

The workload of GO CID and the remits of s pecialist squads<br />

Effects on workload of GO CID<br />

Respondents in the focus groups maintained that, whatever other benefits specialist<br />

squads may bring, their introduction has not provided the relief to GO CID which<br />

might have been expected and has certainly not compensated for the reduction in<br />

numbers they have experienced. GO CID teams have lost experienced detectives to<br />

squads set up at force and regional level to combat terrorism and organised crime.<br />

Although this has not resulted in any reduction in GO CID workload because of the<br />

specialised nature of the work undertaken, the detectives in the groups recognised<br />

that such squads were necessary.<br />

Much of the discussion in the groups focussed, in fact, on other types of specialist<br />

squads, principally the MITs set up at force level but also specialist units in BCUs.<br />

The establishment of these squads to investigate specific types of crime such as<br />

murder, volume crime and particular classes of offenders has relieved GO CID of<br />

some, but by no means all, of the responsibility they had for investigating these<br />

crimes when their departments were much larger and fully resourced. However,<br />

determining which offences fall within the remit of MITs is not as straightforward, in<br />

practice, as it first appears.<br />

Determining the classification of incidents<br />

Given their title, one might have expected to find that the MITs set up at force level<br />

would take responsibility for investigating all the more serious and complex offences<br />

like murders and assaults involving serious injuries, stranger rapes etc. This does<br />

not necessarily follow because the definition of what is a serious offence is not<br />

predetermined but is the product of processes of interpretation and negotiation.<br />

Workload pressure on MITs and their limited resources mean they have to engage in<br />

regular negotiations with GO CID and, sometimes, other specialist teams over<br />

whether a particular incident falls within their remit and, if so, whether it should take<br />

priority over other cases they are investigating. Members of SMTs have had to<br />

adjudicate in disputes between heads of specialist squads as to the ‘correct’<br />

definition of an incident in order to decide whether GO CID or a specialist squad<br />

should take on the investigation and if the latter, which specialist squad.<br />

As Innes found in his research on murder investigations, determining the ‘correct’<br />

definition to apply to an incident is not as straightforward as it might appear:<br />

'The work of the police in terms of deciding upon which is the<br />

correct definition to apply to an incident is often not clear cut.<br />

Overall, the qualitative distinctions between different crimes, and<br />

between crimes and non-crimes, are often more subtle than is<br />

generally understood.' (Innes, 2003: 60).<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!