528 JAMES ADAMS, MICHAEL CLARK, LAWRENCE EZROW, AND GARRETT GLASGOW Ezrow, Lawrence. 2005. “<strong>Are</strong> Moderate <strong>Parties</strong> Rewarded in Multiparty Systems? A Pooled Analysis of Western European Elections, 1984–98.” European Journal of Political Research 44(6):881–98. Golder, Matt. 2003. “Explaining Variation in the Success of Extreme Right <strong>Parties</strong> in Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 36(4):432–66. Green, Donald P., Soo Yeon Kim, and David H. Yoon. 2001. “Dirty Pool.” International Organization 55(2):441–68. Grofman, Bernard. 2001. “The Impact of Electoral Systems on Party Polarization.” Typescript. Groseclose, Tim. 2001. “A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 45(4):862–86. Hearl, Derek. 2001. “Checking the Party Policy Estimates: Reliability.” In Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for <strong>Parties</strong>, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998, ed. Ian Budge, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, and Eric Tanenbaum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 111–25. Hillebrand, Ron, and Galen Irwin. 1999. “Changing Strategies: The Dilemma of the Dutch Labor Party.” In Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political <strong>Parties</strong> in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, ed. Wolfgang Muller and Kaare Strom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 112–49. Hinich, Melvin, and Michael Munger. 1989. “Political Investment, Voter Perceptions, and Candidate Strategy: An Equilibrium Analysis.” In Models of Strategic Choice in Politics,ed. Peter Ordeshook. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 49–68. Hinich, Melvin, Christian Henning, and Susumu Shakano. 2004. “Proximity versus Directional Models of Voting: <strong>Different</strong> Results but One Theory.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Public Choice Society, Baltimore. Hsiao, Cheng. 2003. Analysis of Panel Data. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Huber, John. 1989. “Values and Partisanship in Left-Right Orientations: Measuring Ideology.” European Journal of Political Research 17(5):599–621. Hug, Simon. 1995. “Third <strong>Parties</strong> in Equilibrium.” Public Choice 82(1–2):159–80. Kedar, Orit. 2004. “The Micro Foundations of (Vertically) Divided Government: Evidence <strong>from</strong> Germany.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago. Kedar, Orit. 2005. “When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme <strong>Parties</strong>: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review 99(2):185–200. Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Laver, Michael, Kenneth Benoit, and John Garry. 2003. “Extracting Policy Positions <strong>from</strong> Political Texts Using Words as Data.” American Political Science Review 97(2): 311–31. Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Lin, Tse-Min, Yun-han Chu, and Melvin Hinich. 1996. “Conflict Displacement and Regime Transition in Taiwan: A Spatial Analysis.” World Politics 48(4):453–81. Lin, Tse-Min, James Enelow, and Han Dorussen. 1999. “Equilibrium in Multicandidate Probabilistic Spatial Voting.” Public Choice 98(1–2):59–82. Markus, Gregory B. 1979. Analyzing Panel Data. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. McDonald, Michael, and Ian Budge. 2005. Elections, <strong>Parties</strong>, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate.Oxford:Oxford University Press. McDonald, Michael, and Sylvia Mendes. 2001. “Checking the Party Policy Estimates: Convergent Validity.” In Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for <strong>Parties</strong>, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998, ed. Ian Budge, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, and Eric Tanenbaum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 127–42. McDonald, Michael, Sylvia Mendes, and Ian Budge. 2004. “What <strong>Are</strong> Elections For? Conferring the Median Mandate.” British Journal of Political Science 34(1):1–26. McGann, Anthony. 2002. “The Advantages of Ideological Cohesion: A Model of Constituency Representation and Electoral Competition in Multiparty Democracies.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 14(1):37–70. Meguid, Bonnie. 2005. “Competition between Unequals: The Role of <strong>Mainstream</strong> Party Strategy and <strong>Niche</strong> Party Success.” American Political Science Review 99(3):347–60. Merrill, Samuel, III, and Bernard Grofman. 1999. A Unified Theory of Voting: Directional and Proximity Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Merrill, Samuel, III, and James Adams. 2002. “Centripetal Incentives in Multicandidate Elections.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 14(3):275–300. Miller, Gary, and Norman Schofield. 2003. “Activists and Partisan Realignment in the United States.” American Political Science Review 97(2):245–60. Paldam, Martin. 1991. “How Robust Is the Vote Function? A Study of Seventeen Nations Over Two Decades.” In Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support, ed. Helmut Norpoth, Michael Lewis-Beck, and Jean-Dominique Lafay. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 9– 31. Pelizzo, Riccardo. 2003. “Party Position or Party Direction? An Analysis of Party Manifesto Data.” West European Politics 26(2):67–89. Pennings, Paul. 1998. “Party Responsiveness and Socio- Economic Problem-Solving in Western Democracies.” Party Politics 4(3):393–404. Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press. Powell, G. Bingham, and Guy Whitten. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37(2):391– 414. Przeworski, Adam, and John Sprague. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Quinn, Kevin, and Andrew Martin. 2002. “An Integrated Computational Model of Multiparty Electoral Competition.” Statistical Science 17(4):405–19. Roemer, John. 2001. Political Competition: Theory and Applications. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
ARE NICHE PARTIES DIFFERENT? 529 Rogers, William H. 1993. “Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples.” Stata Technical Bulletin 13:19– 23. Schofield, Norman, Andrew Martin, Kevin Quinn, and David Nixon. 1998. “Multiparty Electoral Competition in the Netherlands and Germany: A Model Based on Multinomial Probit.” Public Choice 97(3):257–93. Schofield, Norman, and Itai Sened. 2005. “Modeling the Interaction of <strong>Parties</strong>, Activists, and Voters: Why Is the Political Center So Empty?” European Journal of Political Research 44(3):355–90. Schofield, Norman, and Itai Sened. 2006. Multiparty Democracy: <strong>Parties</strong>, Elections, and Legislative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Share, Donald. 1999. “From Policy-Seeking to Office-Seeking: The Metamorphosis of the Spanish Socialist Workers Party.” In Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political <strong>Parties</strong> in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, ed. Wolfgang Muller and Kaare Strom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 89–111. Stimson, James, Michael MacKuen, and Robert Erikson. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89(3):543–65. Stokes, Donald. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 57(2):368–77. Tarrow, Sidney. 1989. Democracy and Disorder. Oxford: Clarendon Press. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Various years. Economic Survey of Europe. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations. Williams, Rick L. 2000. “A Note on Robust Variance Estimation for Cluster-Correlated Data.” Biometrics 56(2):645–46.
![Curriculum Vitae [abbreviated] John T. Woolley Professor of Political ...](https://img.yumpu.com/25423597/1/190x245/curriculum-vitae-abbreviated-john-t-woolley-professor-of-political-.jpg?quality=85)
Change language