Quantile Cointegration in the Autoregressive Distributed-Lag ...
Quantile Cointegration in the Autoregressive Distributed-Lag ...
Quantile Cointegration in the Autoregressive Distributed-Lag ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
(i) Let D G := diag([ √ nι ′ 1+qk , nι′ k ]′ ) and G := [G 1 , . . . , G n ] ′ . Then,<br />
(ii) Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,<br />
⎡<br />
⎤<br />
n<br />
n∑<br />
−1 n −1 ¯W′ t n −3/2 X ′ t<br />
D −1<br />
G G′ GD −1<br />
G = ⎢ n<br />
⎣<br />
−1 ¯Wt n −1 ¯Wt ¯W′ t n −3/2 ¯Wt X ′ t<br />
⎥<br />
⎦<br />
t=1<br />
n −3/2 X t n −3/2 X t ¯Wt n −2 X t X ′ t<br />
⎡<br />
1 0 ′ ∫ 1 ¯B 0 W (r) ′ dr<br />
⇒ ⎢ 0 E [ ] ¯Wt ¯W′<br />
⎣<br />
t 0 ′<br />
∫ 1 ¯B<br />
∫ 1<br />
0 W (r)dr 0 ¯B 0 W (r) ¯B W (r) ′ dr<br />
⎤<br />
⎥<br />
⎦ ;<br />
D −1<br />
G G′ Ψ τ (U) =<br />
n∑<br />
⎢<br />
⎣<br />
t=1<br />
⎡<br />
n −1/2 ψ τ [U t (τ)]<br />
n −1/2 ψ τ [U t (τ)] ¯W t<br />
n −1 ψ τ [U t (τ)]X t<br />
⎤ ⎡<br />
⎥<br />
⎦ ⇒ ⎢<br />
⎣<br />
⎤<br />
B ψ (1, τ)<br />
B ψ·W (1, τ) ⎥<br />
∫<br />
⎦ ;<br />
1 ¯B 0 W (r)dB ψ (r, τ)<br />
(iii) D −1<br />
H G′ K(τ) = O P (1), where D H := diag([nι ′ 1+qk , n3/2 ι ′ k ]′ );<br />
(iv) M := n −2 X ′ [I − ˜W(˜W ′ ˜W)<br />
−1 ˜W′ ]X ⇒ ∫ 1<br />
0 ˜B W (r)˜B W (r) ′ dr; and<br />
(v) n −1 X ′ [I − ˜W(˜W ′ ˜W)<br />
−1 ˜W′ ]Ψ τ (U) ⇒ ∫ 1<br />
0 ˜B W (r)dB ψ (r, τ). □<br />
Proof of Corollary A1: (i) Lemmas A1(i), A2(i) and A2(ii) imply that<br />
{<br />
n −1<br />
n∑<br />
t=1<br />
¯W t , n −1<br />
n∑<br />
t=1<br />
¯W t ¯W′ t , n −3/2<br />
n∑<br />
t=1<br />
¯W t X ′ t<br />
}<br />
→ P<br />
{<br />
0, E[ ¯Wt ¯W′ t ], 0 } .<br />
Next, Lemma A3 implies that<br />
} {∫ 1<br />
{n −3/2 X t , n −2 X ′ tX t ⇒<br />
0<br />
∫ 1<br />
}<br />
¯B W (r)dr, ¯B W (r) ¯B W (r)dr .<br />
0<br />
Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se two results we obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> desired result <strong>in</strong> Corollary A1(i).<br />
(ii) Assumption 1(vi) implies that<br />
{<br />
n −1/2<br />
n∑<br />
ψ τ [U t (τ)], n −1/2<br />
t=1<br />
}<br />
n∑<br />
ψ τ [U t (τ)] ¯W t ⇒ {B ψ (1, τ), B ψ·W (1, τ)} .<br />
t=1<br />
Moreover, Lemma A3 implies that n −1 ∑ n<br />
1 ψ τ [U t (τ)]X t ⇒ ∫ 1<br />
0 ¯B W (r)dB ψ (r, τ). By comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se<br />
results, we show that <strong>the</strong> asymptotic limit of D −1<br />
G G′ Ψ τ (U) is equal to Corollary A1(ii).<br />
37