KRA DISCIPLINARY CASES 2004-2005 - Kenya Revenue Authority
KRA DISCIPLINARY CASES 2004-2005 - Kenya Revenue Authority
KRA DISCIPLINARY CASES 2004-2005 - Kenya Revenue Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the main RTD server where the printing of some specific<br />
high value receipts was suppressed making it possible for<br />
the cashier to withhold the money thereon and not reflect<br />
the same in the daily reports. It was established that the<br />
cashier colluded with two Management Information<br />
Systems Officers.<br />
PENALTY:<br />
The Cashier was dismissed for fraud and the two MIS<br />
officers Retired in <strong>Authority</strong>’s Interest for questionable<br />
credibility and loss of confidence.<br />
___________________________________________________________<br />
2.1.2 Case Ref: DISC/07/07/<strong>2005</strong><br />
Department: ROAD TRANSPORT<br />
Station:<br />
NAIROBI<br />
CHARGE:<br />
FRAUD IN CONTRAVENTION OF SECTIONS<br />
4.1.1, 4.1.9, & 4.1.25 OF <strong>KRA</strong> CODE OF CONDUCT<br />
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE:<br />
An Audit by the <strong>Kenya</strong> National Audit office for the<br />
period ending 30 th June <strong>2004</strong> revealed two RTD cashiers<br />
involvement in fraudulent activities through irregularly<br />
undercharging road licence fees to vehicles with high<br />
engine capacity ratings, which require high licence fees thus<br />
resulting in loss of revenue due to the <strong>Authority</strong>.<br />
Investigations carried out established that the cashiers were<br />
indicating the correct amount paid on the taxpayer’s copy<br />
and a smaller amount equivalent to the rate chargeable to<br />
the low licence fee vehicles on the duplicate receipt book<br />
and pocketing the difference. Over Kshs.570,000 revenue<br />
was lost.<br />
PENALTY:<br />
The two cashiers were dismissed for fraud.<br />
___________________________________________________________<br />
Disciplinary cases Page 3 of 13