14.06.2014 Views

Homelessness within ex-Armed Forces Personnel - Riverside

Homelessness within ex-Armed Forces Personnel - Riverside

Homelessness within ex-Armed Forces Personnel - Riverside

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Support needs of homeless <strong>ex</strong>-<strong>Armed</strong> <strong>Forces</strong> <strong>Personnel</strong><br />

Research has identified that homeless<br />

<strong>ex</strong>-UK <strong>Armed</strong> <strong>Forces</strong> <strong>Personnel</strong> are at risk<br />

of both psychological and physical illness<br />

(Hotopf et al., 2006).<br />

These <strong>ex</strong>-Service <strong>Personnel</strong> also have distinct<br />

support needs from those of the general<br />

homeless population (Johnsen, Jones, & Rugg,<br />

2008). Despite suggestions to the contrary no<br />

link has been found between serving in the<br />

<strong>Armed</strong> <strong>Forces</strong> and triggers to becoming<br />

homeless, there are however clear links<br />

between Service in the <strong>Armed</strong> <strong>Forces</strong> and how<br />

homelessness is <strong>ex</strong>perienced by an individual<br />

(Mares, 2004; Johnsen, Jones, & Rugg, 2008).<br />

Ex-Service <strong>Personnel</strong> have been found to have<br />

a higher likelihood of alcoholism and a lower<br />

likelihood of substance abuse in comparison to<br />

the civilian homeless population (Johnsen,<br />

Jones, & Rugg, 2008). A survey of <strong>Riverside</strong><br />

ECHG <strong>ex</strong>-<strong>Armed</strong> <strong>Forces</strong> clients found that<br />

45.5% of respondents had psychiatric or<br />

emotional problems, with around a quarter of<br />

those having drug or alcohol dependency<br />

issues, highlighting the prevalence of these<br />

issues <strong>within</strong> this group. Dual diagnoses<br />

schemes are vital as this group of individuals<br />

are particularly vulnerable and require<br />

specialist care that many supported housing<br />

schemes are unable to provide, meaning that<br />

these individuals maybe at even greater risk of<br />

high levels of social <strong>ex</strong>clusion (Drake, Osher, &<br />

Wallach, 1991). <strong>Riverside</strong> ECHG is one of the<br />

few supported housing providers which runs<br />

successful specialist dual diagnoses schemes.<br />

Data submitted to St Andrews University<br />

Centre for Housing Studies shows that <strong>within</strong><br />

one of these schemes 85% of clients who have<br />

moved on from the scheme since 2007 have<br />

managed to work in collaboration with their<br />

Support Workers to make plans and achieve<br />

successful service departures. The wealth of<br />

knowledge gained from operating such a<br />

scheme is invaluable and is readily passed on<br />

<strong>within</strong> the organisation, meaning that<br />

successful support plans can be adapted easily<br />

to fit the specific needs of the <strong>ex</strong>-Services<br />

<strong>Personnel</strong> <strong>within</strong> the MoD schemes.<br />

The societal and financial costs of<br />

homelessness without these kinds of support<br />

services for dual diagnosis patients are high.<br />

With no support these individuals would be<br />

more likely to have the following undesirable<br />

outcomes – high incidence of accident and<br />

emergency submissions due to alcohol<br />

consumption, increased criminal proceedings<br />

due to alcohol related offences and increased<br />

health and social care costs (SITRA, 2010).<br />

When comparing the cost of providing<br />

supported housing services to no additional<br />

support there is a potential saving of around<br />

52% to the local authority and statutory<br />

partners (SITRA, 2010).<br />

Active Service <strong>within</strong> the military may also<br />

define the support needs required by an<br />

individual. Those who have seen active Service<br />

during conflict are also <strong>ex</strong>posed to risk factors<br />

known to trigger mental health problems, for<br />

<strong>ex</strong>ample Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)<br />

and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (MTBI), which<br />

have been found to be highly correlated with<br />

anger management issues (Fear, et al., 2009;<br />

Elbogen, Wagner, Fuller, Calhoun, Kineer, &<br />

Beckham, 2010).<br />

Anger has been suggested to be one of the<br />

largest factors to affect ability to complete<br />

everyday activities and the levels of social<br />

support received, so again this highlights the<br />

requirement for specialist knowledge of the<br />

support needs of <strong>ex</strong>-<strong>Armed</strong> <strong>Forces</strong> <strong>Personnel</strong> in<br />

order to reduce the possibility of these<br />

individuals becoming socially <strong>ex</strong>cluded<br />

(Marshall, Martin, & Warfield, 2010).<br />

As <strong>Riverside</strong> ECHG has its own specialist<br />

supported housing department dedicated to<br />

the provision of housing and support to<br />

<strong>ex</strong>-<strong>Armed</strong> <strong>Forces</strong> <strong>Personnel</strong> they are able to<br />

adapt and modify already successful support<br />

plans to aid this unique client group, for<br />

<strong>ex</strong>ample including anger management training<br />

as a part of each tenant’s licence agreement.<br />

The staff who work <strong>within</strong> this specialist<br />

branch are particularly well placed to display<br />

empathy and understanding for client needs<br />

as these services have been developed and<br />

driven by staff who, in a number of cases have<br />

themselves served in the <strong>Armed</strong> <strong>Forces</strong>,<br />

allowing them an insight into the specific<br />

issues and <strong>ex</strong>periences. The advantages of<br />

peer support are widely known due to the<br />

effect of positive role modelling (Dixon, Kraus,<br />

& Lehman, 1994) and, in the case of homeless<br />

veterans, they have been shown to be related<br />

to greater success in the transition into<br />

independent accommodation (Weissman,<br />

Covell, Kushner, Irwin, & Essock, 2005).<br />

Further distinctions from the general homeless<br />

population are that <strong>ex</strong>-<strong>Armed</strong> Service<br />

<strong>Personnel</strong> are more likely to sleep rough and<br />

for longer periods whilst homeless (Johnsen,<br />

Jones, & Rugg, 2008). A report by CHAIN<br />

suggests that around 6% of the rough sleepers<br />

in London had served in the <strong>Armed</strong> <strong>Forces</strong>,<br />

with around half of those serving in the UK<br />

<strong>Armed</strong> <strong>Forces</strong> (CHAIN, 2011). This high<br />

incidence of rough sleeping has been attributed<br />

to their survival skills training (Higate, 2000).<br />

The suggestion is that the training received<br />

ensures <strong>ex</strong>-Service <strong>Personnel</strong> have the skills<br />

and resilience to cope with sleeping rough and<br />

therefore be able to draw on these skills when<br />

accommodation is not available.<br />

A reluctance to ask for help with mental health<br />

or substance abuse issues is common amongst<br />

<strong>ex</strong>-Service homeless, which may be due to the<br />

masculine stereotype of military personnel;<br />

they may feel that asking for help or admitting<br />

to having a problem displays weakness of<br />

character and may also increase personal<br />

feelings of failure. This lack of help seeking<br />

behaviour may also be linked to a higher<br />

proportion of rough sleeping amongst<br />

<strong>ex</strong>-Services <strong>Personnel</strong>, making this a very<br />

challenging demographic to gain access to<br />

in order to provide them with appropriate<br />

support and advice (Iversen, et al., 2005).<br />

The issues above highlight the importance<br />

of supported accommodation projects to<br />

enable rough sleepers to have access to<br />

shelter should they need it, particularly in<br />

the towns and cities situated close to <strong>Armed</strong><br />

<strong>Forces</strong> bases. <strong>Riverside</strong> ECHG’s schemes at<br />

the Catterick and Aldershot bases are an<br />

<strong>ex</strong>cellent <strong>ex</strong>ample of how well used these<br />

schemes would be and therefore how essential<br />

they are to ensure the continued wellbeing of<br />

<strong>Personnel</strong> leaving the <strong>Armed</strong> <strong>Forces</strong>.<br />

The average demographics of homeless<br />

<strong>ex</strong>-Service <strong>Personnel</strong> have also been found to<br />

differ from the general population, with<br />

significantly higher mean ages and the<br />

population being made up predominantly from<br />

white males (Johnsen, Jones, & Rugg, 2008).<br />

These figures are reflective of the general<br />

demographics <strong>within</strong> the UK <strong>Armed</strong> <strong>Forces</strong>.<br />

The higher mean age may be attributed to the<br />

lack of help seeking behaviour leading to a<br />

prolonged time period spent homeless.<br />

10 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!