Atom and molecule: upper secondary school French students ...

A. Cokelez and A. Dumon 132
References
Barlet R. and Plouin D. (1997), La dualité microscopique-macroscopique: un obstacle sous-jacent aux
difficultés en chimie dans l’enseignement universitaire, ASTER, 25, 143-173.
Ben-Zvi R., Eylon B. and Silberstein J. (1988), Theories, principles and laws, Education in
Chemistry, 25, 89-92
Charlet-Brehelin D. (1998), Contribution à l’enseignement - apprentissage du concept d’atome au
collège, Thèse, Université Montpellier II.
De Vos, W. and Verdonk A.H. (1987), A new road to reaction. Part 4. The substances and its
molecules, Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 692-695.
Driver R. and Easley J., (1978), Pupils and paradigms: a review of literature related to concept
development in adolescent science students, Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
Gilbert J.K. and Swift D.J., (1985), Towards a Lakatosian analysis of the Piagetian and the alternative
conceptions research programs, Science Education, 69, 681-696.
Gilbert J.K., Osborne R.J. and Fensham P.J., (1982), Children's science and its consequences for
teaching, Science Education, 66, 623-633.
Giordan A. and De Vecchi G. (1987), Les origines du savoir, Delachaux and Niestlé, Neuchâtel -
Paris.
Griffiths K. A. and Preston R. K., (1992), Grade-12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental
characteristics of atoms and molecules, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 611-628.
Harrison A.G. and Treagust D.F., (1996), Secondary students’ mental models of atoms and molecules:
implications for teaching chemistry, Science Education, 80, 509-534.
Harrison A.G. and Treagust D.F., (2000), Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: a
case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry, Science Education, 84, 352-381.
Johnston K., (1988), Learning and teaching about the particulate theory of matter: a report on a
teaching scheme in action, in proceeding of a bi-national UK-Israel seminar: Learning difficulties
in chemistry, Jerusalem, 55-79.
Justi R. and Gilbert J., (2000), History and philosophy of science through models: some challenges in
the case of ‘the atom’, International Journal of Science Education, 22, 993-1009.
Keig F.P. and Rubba A.P., (1993), Translation of representations of the structure of matter and its
relationship to reasoning, gender, spatial reasoning, and specific prior knowledge, Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 30, 883-903.
Laugier A. and Dumon A., (2000), Histoire des sciences et modélisation de la transformation
chimique, Bulletin de l'Union des Physiciens, 826, 1261-1284.
Niaz M., Aguilera D., Maza A. and Liendo G., (2002), Arguments, contradictions, resistances and
conceptual change in students' understanding of atomic structure, Science Education, 86, 505-
525.
Osborne, R. and Freyberg P., (1985), Learning in science: the implications of children’s science,
Auckland:Heineman. (in Griffiths and Preston, 1992, p. 612 ).
Pereira M.P. and Pestana M.E.M., (1991), Students’ representations of models of water, International
Journal of Science Education, 13, 313-319.
Robinson W.R., (1998), An alternative framework for chemical bonding, Journal of Chemical
Education, 75, 1074.
Taber K.S., (1998), An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education, International
Journal of Science Education, 20, 597-608.
Taber, K. S., (2003), The atom in the chemistry curriculum: fundamental concept, teaching model or
epistemological obstacle?, Foundations of Chemistry, 5, 43-84.
Taber K.S., (2004), Learning quanta: barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of
orbital ideas, Science Education, 89, 94-116.
Toomey R., DePierro E. and Garafalo F., (2001), Helping students to make inferences about the
atomic realm by delaying the presentation of atomic structure, Chemistry Education Research
and Practice, 2, 129-144.
Tsai C.C., (1998), An analysis of Taiwanese eighth graders’ science achievement, scientific
epistemological beliefs and cognitive structure outcomes after learning basic atomic theory,
International Journal of Science Education, 20, 413-425.
Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2005, 6 (3), 119-135
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry