19.06.2014 Views

YCL CONGRESS EDITION - South African Communist Party

YCL CONGRESS EDITION - South African Communist Party

YCL CONGRESS EDITION - South African Communist Party

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CIVIL SOCIETY<br />

The Civil Society<br />

Conference, the NDR and<br />

the liberal onslaught<br />

We need to avoid being manipulated by the agenda<br />

of anti-majority, right-wing liberalism<br />

BY JEREMY CRONIN<br />

“In the art of war, each belligerent chooses<br />

the terrain considered most advantageous<br />

for its battle for the offensive and tries to<br />

impose that terrain on its adversary, so<br />

that it is put on the defensive. The same<br />

goes for politics ... ” (Samir Amin, “The<br />

Battlefields Chosen by Contemporary<br />

Imperialism”)<br />

The truth of Samir Amin’s observation<br />

is particularly evident in<br />

the current <strong>South</strong> <strong>African</strong> reality.<br />

Those in our society who are<br />

opposed to fundamental transformation<br />

naturally seek to shift politics on<br />

to a terrain that they calculate is most<br />

favourable for them to put us on to the<br />

defensive.<br />

They seek to produce a particular<br />

reading of <strong>South</strong> Africa that, they hope,<br />

will dominate on the air-waves, in the<br />

print media columns, and generally hegemonise<br />

public debate. If you succeed<br />

in shaping the terrain, then you shape<br />

how most of us then often unconsciously<br />

begin to understand our challenges and<br />

how we respond to them in practice.<br />

As things have shifted, these antitransformation<br />

forces have adapted their<br />

tactics. For instance, with the implosion<br />

of Cope, they have once more swung<br />

much of their attention and hopes away<br />

from the party political terrain and back<br />

towards “civil society”. But the underlying<br />

strategic agenda remains the same<br />

– to constrain the democratic state, to<br />

weaken and divide the majority, to sow<br />

popular demoralisation about government,<br />

and to mobilise against what is<br />

supposed to be a dire threat to our constitution<br />

emanating from the “ruling<br />

elite”.<br />

We should, of course, not be in denial<br />

about the serious gaps opened up<br />

for this line of attack by real weaknesses<br />

within the state and the ANC and our Alliance<br />

formations. In particular, there is a<br />

compradorial and parasitic rent-seeking<br />

stratum within our movement, often<br />

linked to a demagogic populism that<br />

has little respect for legality or the Constitution.<br />

As we have argued elsewhere,<br />

anti-majoritarian liberal forces are happy<br />

to provide a media megaphone for this<br />

demagogic populism – the better to be<br />

able to condemn us all. The existence of<br />

this phenomenon (what we have called<br />

“the new tendency”) creates space for all<br />

manner of anti-ANC forces. This is why it<br />

is absolutely imperative that the government,<br />

the ANC and its alliance partners<br />

together lead the process of dealing firmly,<br />

and without fear or favour, with the<br />

scourge of corruption and demagogy.<br />

However, using the gap created by<br />

this minority “new tendency” within<br />

our own ranks (and seeking to present<br />

There is a compradorial<br />

and parasitic<br />

rent-seeking stratum<br />

within our movement<br />

its antics as the “real” ANC), the antitransformation<br />

forces seek to displace<br />

the liberation movement’s strategic hegemony<br />

with their own anti-majoritarian<br />

liberalism. In essence this consists in trying<br />

to displace the idea of an ongoing national<br />

democratic revolution (NDR) with<br />

a politics of “civil rights claims”. This is<br />

done by establishing a false dichotomy<br />

between the realisation of civil rights<br />

in SA and the NDR, with the latter portrayed<br />

as the “enemy” of civil rights and<br />

the Constitution.<br />

Civil rights ‘versus’ the national democratic<br />

revolution – a false dichotomy<br />

Liberalism exists in SA in two basic forms<br />

– a right-wing, free market, anti-majoritarian<br />

liberalism and a more centre-left<br />

leaning, NGO/“social movement” liberalism.<br />

There are differences between<br />

these currents of liberalism, but they<br />

share a common fundamental paradigm<br />

and, for a variety of reasons, there has<br />

been a growing practical convergence<br />

between them in the recent period. In<br />

our current reality liberalism (in both its<br />

versions) seeks to shift the centre of our<br />

national debate:<br />

From the necessity for a radical structural<br />

transformation of our society (notably,<br />

placing our economy on to a “new<br />

growth path”) ... to a debate about defending<br />

civil rights (as if radically transforming<br />

our economy was not fundamental<br />

to the real consolidation of civil<br />

rights for all <strong>South</strong> <strong>African</strong>s) .<br />

From the necessity of organising and<br />

building people’s power both outside and<br />

December 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!