Old_Cliftonian_Mag_2011
Old_Cliftonian_Mag_2011
Old_Cliftonian_Mag_2011
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Heraldry<br />
Harking to the Heralds<br />
C.S. Knighton (Editor of the Register) looks for<br />
the hidden agenda in Clifton’s coat of arms.<br />
Argent a chevron between two trefoils<br />
slipped in chief and in base a garb<br />
azure, on a chief gules a crown<br />
or between two books argent, garnished<br />
and clasped or. That, in the language of<br />
heralds, is what appears on Clifton’s<br />
shield. We see this everywhere and<br />
recognize it immediately as our corporate<br />
emblem. Its significance is less familiar<br />
and needs some unwrapping.<br />
Relatively few schools and colleges<br />
have their own distinct and properly<br />
authorized heraldry. The oldest school<br />
arms are those granted to Eton by the<br />
founder, Henry VI, in 1449; at the same<br />
time a matching coat was prescribed for<br />
the sister foundation of King’s College,<br />
Cambridge (with three roses where<br />
Eton has lilies). This design, which set<br />
elements of the royal arms in a bold new<br />
framework, is a remote ancestor of the<br />
arms granted to Clifton in 1895.<br />
Many schools simply use the<br />
undifferenced arms of their founders.<br />
Very rarely do they have any right<br />
to do so, but the practice is generally<br />
explained and accepted as filial pietas.<br />
Failing even this option schools have<br />
concocted arms of their own, often in<br />
the most appalling heraldic taste. The<br />
nadir was surely reached by Grange Hill<br />
(G impaling H), though plenty of real<br />
institutions have done little better.<br />
So it was at first with us. Clifton had<br />
no founder in the strict sense: an<br />
individual or corporation who set it up,<br />
provided funds for its maintenance and<br />
regulated its life by statutes. The school<br />
began as a commercial venture, the<br />
shareholders being a large body of local<br />
gentry, professionals and merchants.<br />
This amorphous parentage could not be<br />
represented heraldically, so in its early<br />
days the College adopted bogus arms<br />
alluding to its religious character and<br />
imagined gentility. This had in first and<br />
fourth quarters respectively a trefoil<br />
(clover leaf) and a lion rampant between<br />
six cinquefoils representing ‘the family<br />
of Clifton’, with the arms of the see of<br />
Bristol (Sable three ducal coronets in pale<br />
or) in the second and third quarters.<br />
The cinquefoils were enough for most<br />
armigerous Cliftons, but a Somerset<br />
branch bore Sable, a lion rampant between<br />
eight cinquefoils and a trefoil in chief slipped<br />
or. There is no evident connexion<br />
between these people and the village of<br />
Clifton, let alone the College; but since<br />
the clover leaf is also a Christian emblem<br />
representing the Trinity, it was doubtless<br />
thought very apt.<br />
It has been claimed that the Clifton<br />
trefoil actually compliments Dr John<br />
Addington Symonds of Clifton Hill<br />
House, and his son of the same names.<br />
Three trefoils do indeed feature in their<br />
family arms, but J.A.S. senior was only<br />
one among the original Governors, and<br />
Clifton was using the trefoil long before<br />
the son became a literary celebrity. The<br />
original arms appear on the cover of the<br />
first <strong>Cliftonian</strong> (1867). The motto Haec<br />
studia oblectant was a wry compression of<br />
Cicero’s Haec studia adolescentiam alunt,<br />
senectutem oblectant (Pro Archia Poeta, 16);<br />
the elided alo would reappear later in<br />
a different form.<br />
The whole thing was nevertheless<br />
illegal. By March 1870 the Council<br />
had evidently realised this and<br />
deputed the Secretary to ‘take out a<br />
licence’ for armorial bearings, as if it<br />
was as simple as licensing a dog or a<br />
gun. In fact obtaining a grant from<br />
the College of Arms (or Heralds’<br />
College) is a lengthy and expensive<br />
process, in which the Council took no<br />
further interest for two decades.<br />
After the Royal Charter of 1877, by<br />
which the College was refounded as<br />
a corporate body, an official grant of<br />
arms was thought even more necessary;<br />
but nothing was done until 1893. The<br />
Masters then offered to pay the Heralds’<br />
fees (estimated at £70), and Council<br />
asked one of their number, D.C.A.<br />
Cave, to consult with the Head Master<br />
(Glazebrook). They produced some<br />
sketches; and though Masters then<br />
withdrew their subvention, Glazebrook<br />
assured Council that if they were<br />
worried about the expense, he was<br />
confident of raising it elsewhere. So<br />
Council authorized the application, with<br />
particular hope that the version with the<br />
lion ‘in chief ’ would be approved.<br />
This, however, was not liked by the<br />
Heralds, and though another design was<br />
submitted, by April 1894 Council had had<br />
enough, and ‘negatived’ the application.<br />
Three months later H.J. Wiseman wrote<br />
on behalf of the Masters with promise<br />
of £80, whereupon Council rescinded<br />
the April decision, and the application<br />
was endorsed by the President, Lord<br />
Ducie. One final hurdle was set by Rouge<br />
Dragon Pursuivant (Everard Green<br />
F.S.A.), to whom the work was committed,<br />
who explained that his fees were payable<br />
in advance; so cheques for £76 10s and 2<br />
guineas were despatched.<br />
The grant was eventually issued<br />
on 8 April 1895. The large vellum<br />
document, executed by Rouge<br />
Dragon’s Artist, G.W. Eve, is<br />
authenticated by the seals of the three<br />
Kings of Arms (Garter, Clarenceux<br />
and Norroy). In lay terms the red<br />
section at the top of the shield<br />
represents a royal foundation, as does<br />
the crown or ducal coronet (heraldry<br />
is surprisingly vague on this detail).<br />
26 the CLIFTON MAGAZINE <strong>2011</strong>