REVIEW ARTICLE Ufology: What Have We Learned? - Society for ...

I
552 M. D. Swords
I cannot "prove" to you, in most senses of what physics and chemistry, and
pie-in-your-face everyday experience, try to claim that they do. But, let's give it
a try anyway.
The UFO Phenomenon Is Real
My personal learning that the UFO phenomenon was real took place back in
1959, when my brother and I (and several others) witnessed a UFO flyby down the
Kanawha River basin near Charleston, West Virginia. So, I didn't have to wait for
the post-1980 SSE era for that addition to my world view. Many other persons
didn't have to wait that long either and some of this knowledge has been brought
into the open, most clearly, in the historical scholarship of the 1980s and 1990s.
One doesn't argue "from authority" but awareness of what other persons,
who made it their business to study the UFO mystery, have concluded, is a nontrivial
data-point in deciding what is reasonable to believe about this subject.
The SSE era has seen a large upgrading in our awareness of this UFO history.
Germane to the point at hand, here is what we know (have documented) about
studies and conclusions about ~ ~ 0 s ' ~ :
A. During WWII, the foo fighter experiences of our pilots were taken very
~
seriously. Accounts of cases were presented to heavyweight scientists, such as
David Griggs, Luis Alvarez, and H. P. Robertson. The phenomenon was never
explained. Most of the information about the issue has never been released by
military intelligence.
B. During the first American UFO wave of June-July 1947, the U.S. Air Force
(USAF) (Pentagon Intelligence) took the flying disks very seriously. The
number two operative in the Intelligence Collections division, Lt. Col. George
Garrett, was given the task of researching them. Military pilot reports soon
indicated to him that we had unknown airspace violations on our hands. Civilian
cases confirmed this. Inquiries to all military advanced technology programs
were returned with "they're not ours."
By late July/early August, Garrett concluded that some low-aspect (thin)
disklike aerial technology which was capable of extremely advanced performance
characteristics was occasionally flying about. He wasn't at all
embarrassed by this conclusion. He sent it up the intelligence ladder and to
General Twining at Wright-Patterson's Air Materiel Command (AMC) as well.
C. At AMC Twining put Intelligence chief, Col. Howard McCoy, to work
on a second assessment. McCoy brought together the intellectual resources of
Wright-Patterson to view the collected information (Figure 5). Heads of the
Engineering Division, Intelligence, and the Air Institute of Technology were
there. So, too, were the chiefs of several laboratories (Aircraft, Power Plants,
Propellers). Their conclusion was the same as Garrett's: real technological phenomenon.
"The phenomenon reported is something real and not visionary or
fictitio~s."'~ They said that they could imagine construction of a flying machine
which would imitate most of these characteristics but it would take a lot of
development time and effort.