Part II: OWL - Foundations of Semantic Web Technologies

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Further remarks Several major conferences on Semantic Web: ISWC (>600), ESWC (>300), WWW Semantic Web track, IJCAI Semantic Web track, etc. Semantic Web languages taught in many university courses world-wide. Becomes established topic. Industrial uptake currently happening e.g. OWL reasoners by IBM, ORACLE many application studies by major IT companies considerable number of spin-offs venture capital (e.g. VULCAN Inc.) Considerable uptake in the life sciences Substantial project funding (EU, NIH, etc.) 60
Suggestions for OWL? Annual Workshop OWL: Experiences and Directions Co-located with ISWC09 (just beforehand), October 2009. Usually >80 people, most of them doing applications. Major OWL language designers are there. Past discussions had major impact on OWL 2 → state your opinon there! Low paper barrier, position statements and experience reports welcome. Deadline July 24th. http://www.webont.org/owled/2009/ 61 Institute – Author – Title – other informations KIT – The cooperation of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and Universität Karlsruhe (TH)
Page 1 and 2:
Semantic Web Modelling Languages (P
Page 3 and 4:
OWL - Overview Web Ontology Languag
Page 5 and 6:
References - Textbooks Pascal Hitzl
Page 7 and 8:
Contents OWL - Basic Ideas OWL As t
Page 9 and 10: OWL Building Blocks individuals (wr
Page 11 and 12: DL syntax RDFS syntax Person(mary)
Page 13 and 14: Class constructors conjunction Moth
Page 15 and 16: Contents OWL - Basic Ideas OWL As t
Page 17 and 18: Understanding SROIQ(D) ALC + role c
Page 19 and 20: Understanding SROIQ(D) I - inverse
Page 21 and 22: Understanding SROIQ(D) (D) - dataty
Page 23 and 24: Understanding SROIQ(D) further expr
Page 25 and 26: Some Syntactic Sugar in OWL This ap
Page 27 and 28: OWL - Extralogical Features OWL ont
Page 29 and 30: The RDFS perspective RDFS semantics
Page 31 and 32: Contents OWL - Basic Ideas OWL As t
Page 33 and 34: Expressivity Examples: Rules in OWL
Page 35 and 36: OWL Semantics There are two semanti
Page 37 and 38: OWL Direct Semantics: Restrictions
Page 39 and 40: OWL Direct Semantics model-theoreti
Page 41 and 42: OWL Direct Semantics via FOL but of
Page 43 and 44: OWL Profiles OWL Full - using the R
Page 45 and 46: OWL 2 RL motivated by the question:
Page 47 and 48: OWL 2 QL motivated by the question:
Page 49 and 50: Proof Theory Traditionally using ta
Page 51 and 52: DL Tableaux Termination Problem TBo
Page 53 and 54: Blocking (in ALC) y is blocked (by
Page 55 and 56: ALC Tableau Example TBox: ¬C t ∀
Page 57 and 58: OWL tools (incomplete listing) Reas
Page 59: Some Current Research Questions Int
Page 63 and 64: Main References W3C OWL Working Gro
Page 65 and 66: Further References DL complexity ca
show all

Part II: OWL - Foundations of Semantic Web Technologies

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?