03.07.2014 Views

Highlights of the 76th Texas Legislature - Senate

Highlights of the 76th Texas Legislature - Senate

Highlights of the 76th Texas Legislature - Senate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

______________________ JURISPRUDENCE<br />

SUMMARY JUDGEMENT PROCEEDINGS - H.B. 2186<br />

by Representative Dutton<br />

<strong>Senate</strong> Sponsor: Senator Ellis<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> a summary judgment proceeding is to provide for <strong>the</strong> disposition <strong>of</strong><br />

controversies that do not present fact issues, but present only questions <strong>of</strong> law. Under <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Texas</strong> Rules <strong>of</strong> Civil Procedure, summary judgment is appropriate if a movant establishes<br />

that <strong>the</strong>re are no genuine issues <strong>of</strong> material fact and that <strong>the</strong> movant is entitled to<br />

judgment as a matter <strong>of</strong> law. H.B. 2186 establishes conditions regarding summary<br />

judgments issued by a court.<br />

TELECONFERENCING TECHNOLOGY BY APPELLATE COURTS - H.B. 3418<br />

by Representative Gallego<br />

<strong>Senate</strong> Sponsor: Senator Harris<br />

Strikes provisions requiring consent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parties or <strong>the</strong>ir attorneys if <strong>the</strong> chief justice or<br />

presiding judge or <strong>the</strong> supreme court, <strong>the</strong> court <strong>of</strong> criminal appeals, or a court <strong>of</strong> appeals<br />

decides to hear oral argument through <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> teleconferencing technology.<br />

.<br />

Provides that <strong>the</strong> actual and necessary expenses <strong>of</strong> an appellate court hearing an oral<br />

argument through <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> teleconferencing technology following <strong>the</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

case to that appellate court from ano<strong>the</strong>r shall be paid by <strong>the</strong> state from funds<br />

appropriated for <strong>the</strong> actual and necessary traveling and living expenses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> justices<br />

arising from <strong>the</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong> cases.<br />

WAGE WITHHOLDING FOR ALIMONY - H.J.R. 16<br />

by Representatives Thompson and Hill<br />

<strong>Senate</strong> Sponsor: Senator Harris<br />

Prior to 1995, child support was <strong>the</strong> only type <strong>of</strong> family support that could be ordered in<br />

<strong>Texas</strong> and <strong>the</strong> only type <strong>of</strong> family support for which wages could be garnished. The 1995<br />

welfare reform bill included a provision for limited alimony in an attempt to keep a<br />

spouse with limited job skills and financial resources <strong>of</strong>f government assistance.<br />

However, alimony has been difficult to enforce without a garnishment provision.<br />

This bill requires <strong>the</strong> submission to <strong>the</strong> voters <strong>of</strong> a constitutional amendment allowing a<br />

person’s wages to be garnished to pay court-ordered alimony.<br />

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _<br />

<strong>Senate</strong> Research Center 231 76 th <strong>Legislature</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!