Download PDF, Issue 26 - Swiss Futures and Options Association
Download PDF, Issue 26 - Swiss Futures and Options Association
Download PDF, Issue 26 - Swiss Futures and Options Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Focus<br />
Union’s regulators in terms of regulatory<br />
culture, attitudes, powers, practice <strong>and</strong><br />
procedure suggest that that<br />
would simply not be the case. The<br />
establishment of an EU SEC – at<br />
this stage – would merely serve to<br />
internalise these differences <strong>and</strong><br />
generate the creation of a<br />
Leviathan regulator mired in the<br />
process of political consensusbuilding<br />
across 25 member states<br />
<strong>and</strong> by bureaucratic processes<br />
which would snag innovation<br />
<strong>and</strong> market development.<br />
Levelling the Regulatory Playing<br />
Field<br />
If the preferred goal is to establish effective<br />
coordination <strong>and</strong> commonality<br />
across the rules <strong>and</strong> procedures of individual<br />
member state competent authorities<br />
<strong>and</strong> deliver a practical <strong>and</strong> effective<br />
level of regulatory harmonisation (tempered<br />
by the need for differentiation to<br />
accommodate diverse markets <strong>and</strong> niche<br />
financial service institutions), then structural<br />
convergence is not an essential<br />
pre-requisite. Indeed, the continuance of<br />
individual authorities working to common<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> principles would not<br />
only preserve an important element of<br />
“The establishment of<br />
an EU SEC would merely<br />
serve to internalise current<br />
differences among European<br />
regulators. ”<br />
competitiveness in the development of<br />
EU regulatory policy, but would ensure<br />
the preservation of those regulatory<br />
authorities which do have an open consensus-building<br />
approach to regulation.<br />
If we really want to achieve an effective<br />
<strong>and</strong> efficient single market in financial<br />
services, then it is vital that EU legislators<br />
<strong>and</strong> regulators take into full<br />
account the priorities of market operators<br />
<strong>and</strong> financial service providers, particularly<br />
in the context of their need for<br />
their activities to be reasonably profitable,<br />
innovative <strong>and</strong> competitive; <strong>and</strong><br />
the parallel needs of investors <strong>and</strong> consumers<br />
to be able to conduct their trading<br />
activities at reasonable cost with<br />
all the benefits of open<br />
rights of access to markets,<br />
providers <strong>and</strong> products.<br />
We ignore these<br />
business priorities <strong>and</strong><br />
the need for market efficiency<br />
at our peril.<br />
Anthony Belchambers, CEO, FOA<br />
The <strong>Futures</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Options</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />
(FOA) is the European industry association<br />
for some 160 firms <strong>and</strong> institutions<br />
which engage in the carrying on<br />
of derivatives business, particularly<br />
in relation to exchange-traded transactions,<br />
<strong>and</strong> whose membership<br />
includes banks, brokerage houses<br />
<strong>and</strong> other financial institutions, commodity<br />
trade houses, power <strong>and</strong> energy<br />
companies, exchanges <strong>and</strong> clearing<br />
houses, fund managers <strong>and</strong> firms<br />
involved in supplying services into the<br />
futures <strong>and</strong> options sector.<br />
13<br />
SWISS DERIVATIVES REVIEW <strong>26</strong> – NOVEMBER 2004