06.07.2014 Views

Download PDF, Issue 26 - Swiss Futures and Options Association

Download PDF, Issue 26 - Swiss Futures and Options Association

Download PDF, Issue 26 - Swiss Futures and Options Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Focus<br />

Union’s regulators in terms of regulatory<br />

culture, attitudes, powers, practice <strong>and</strong><br />

procedure suggest that that<br />

would simply not be the case. The<br />

establishment of an EU SEC – at<br />

this stage – would merely serve to<br />

internalise these differences <strong>and</strong><br />

generate the creation of a<br />

Leviathan regulator mired in the<br />

process of political consensusbuilding<br />

across 25 member states<br />

<strong>and</strong> by bureaucratic processes<br />

which would snag innovation<br />

<strong>and</strong> market development.<br />

Levelling the Regulatory Playing<br />

Field<br />

If the preferred goal is to establish effective<br />

coordination <strong>and</strong> commonality<br />

across the rules <strong>and</strong> procedures of individual<br />

member state competent authorities<br />

<strong>and</strong> deliver a practical <strong>and</strong> effective<br />

level of regulatory harmonisation (tempered<br />

by the need for differentiation to<br />

accommodate diverse markets <strong>and</strong> niche<br />

financial service institutions), then structural<br />

convergence is not an essential<br />

pre-requisite. Indeed, the continuance of<br />

individual authorities working to common<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> principles would not<br />

only preserve an important element of<br />

“The establishment of<br />

an EU SEC would merely<br />

serve to internalise current<br />

differences among European<br />

regulators. ”<br />

competitiveness in the development of<br />

EU regulatory policy, but would ensure<br />

the preservation of those regulatory<br />

authorities which do have an open consensus-building<br />

approach to regulation.<br />

If we really want to achieve an effective<br />

<strong>and</strong> efficient single market in financial<br />

services, then it is vital that EU legislators<br />

<strong>and</strong> regulators take into full<br />

account the priorities of market operators<br />

<strong>and</strong> financial service providers, particularly<br />

in the context of their need for<br />

their activities to be reasonably profitable,<br />

innovative <strong>and</strong> competitive; <strong>and</strong><br />

the parallel needs of investors <strong>and</strong> consumers<br />

to be able to conduct their trading<br />

activities at reasonable cost with<br />

all the benefits of open<br />

rights of access to markets,<br />

providers <strong>and</strong> products.<br />

We ignore these<br />

business priorities <strong>and</strong><br />

the need for market efficiency<br />

at our peril.<br />

Anthony Belchambers, CEO, FOA<br />

The <strong>Futures</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Options</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />

(FOA) is the European industry association<br />

for some 160 firms <strong>and</strong> institutions<br />

which engage in the carrying on<br />

of derivatives business, particularly<br />

in relation to exchange-traded transactions,<br />

<strong>and</strong> whose membership<br />

includes banks, brokerage houses<br />

<strong>and</strong> other financial institutions, commodity<br />

trade houses, power <strong>and</strong> energy<br />

companies, exchanges <strong>and</strong> clearing<br />

houses, fund managers <strong>and</strong> firms<br />

involved in supplying services into the<br />

futures <strong>and</strong> options sector.<br />

13<br />

SWISS DERIVATIVES REVIEW <strong>26</strong> – NOVEMBER 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!