POLI20532 Course Outline 1112 - School of Social Sciences
POLI20532 Course Outline 1112 - School of Social Sciences
POLI20532 Course Outline 1112 - School of Social Sciences
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>POLI20532</strong>: <strong>Course</strong> Guide 2011-12<br />
within the context <strong>of</strong> a broader discussion. A degree <strong>of</strong> selectivity is not only indispensable<br />
but the key to a well-focused argument. However, the focus should be explained and the<br />
broader context and debates clearly indicated: a strong, clear introductory paragraph, as<br />
always, is the key to a really effective answer.<br />
WEEK 5<br />
To what extent was modernisation the central political issue <strong>of</strong> the<br />
1960s and 1970s, and why should this have been so?<br />
5.1 Questions<br />
1. Why did the need for modernisation loom so large in British politics by the 1960s?<br />
How important wasLabour’s modernising agenda in securing its return to power in 1964?<br />
2. Did the Wilson governments <strong>of</strong> 1964-70 betray the promise <strong>of</strong> modernisation? Did<br />
they, as critics alleged, betray their own supporters? If so, was this due to constraints, events,<br />
expediency or just a lack <strong>of</strong> vision? Is it time to make the case again for the government’s<br />
achievements?<br />
3. What was Heath’s variation on the theme <strong>of</strong> modernisation? Was this only a ‘bogus<br />
alternative’ (Samuel Brittan) to Wilson? Or was the ‘Heath experiment’ a dry run for<br />
Thatcher’s neo-liberalism, and if so why was it so rapidly abandoned? Was Heath the last <strong>of</strong><br />
the One Nation Tories or the first <strong>of</strong> the Thatcherites?<br />
4. By 1974 the vote for both main parties was declining. Why did the promise <strong>of</strong><br />
modernisation not fulfilled? Was it a failure <strong>of</strong> leadership? Or did it go deeper than this?<br />
5.2 Essential readings<br />
Contemporary British History<br />
Gregory Elliott<br />
21, 3, 2007: special issue on Wilson governments<br />
including articles on economic policy, industrial<br />
relations, the machinery <strong>of</strong> government and the<br />
creative industries. For an overview see especially<br />
Glenn O’Hara and Helen Parr, ‘Introduction: the Fall<br />
and Rise <strong>of</strong> a Reputation’, pp. 295-302, and the same<br />
authors’ concluding feature.<br />
Labourism and the English Genius, 1993, ch. 3 (HD<br />
and Blackboard). An acerbic statement <strong>of</strong> the critical<br />
view.<br />
5.3 General texts and alternative readings<br />
Kenneth Morgan Britain Since 1945, chs 7-9<br />
David Childs Britain Since 1945, chs 7-9<br />
Richard Coopey et al, eds. The Wilson Governments 1964-1970, 1993. (Copies<br />
<strong>of</strong> David Horner’s chapter ‘The road to Scarborough:<br />
Wilson, Labour and the scientific revolution’ also in<br />
HD).<br />
Andrew Gamble<br />
Britain in Decline, 1994 edn, ch. 4 (copies in HD).<br />
21