14.07.2014 Views

POLI20532 Course Outline 1112 - School of Social Sciences

POLI20532 Course Outline 1112 - School of Social Sciences

POLI20532 Course Outline 1112 - School of Social Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>POLI20532</strong>: <strong>Course</strong> Guide 2011-12<br />

within the context <strong>of</strong> a broader discussion. A degree <strong>of</strong> selectivity is not only indispensable<br />

but the key to a well-focused argument. However, the focus should be explained and the<br />

broader context and debates clearly indicated: a strong, clear introductory paragraph, as<br />

always, is the key to a really effective answer.<br />

WEEK 5<br />

To what extent was modernisation the central political issue <strong>of</strong> the<br />

1960s and 1970s, and why should this have been so?<br />

5.1 Questions<br />

1. Why did the need for modernisation loom so large in British politics by the 1960s?<br />

How important wasLabour’s modernising agenda in securing its return to power in 1964?<br />

2. Did the Wilson governments <strong>of</strong> 1964-70 betray the promise <strong>of</strong> modernisation? Did<br />

they, as critics alleged, betray their own supporters? If so, was this due to constraints, events,<br />

expediency or just a lack <strong>of</strong> vision? Is it time to make the case again for the government’s<br />

achievements?<br />

3. What was Heath’s variation on the theme <strong>of</strong> modernisation? Was this only a ‘bogus<br />

alternative’ (Samuel Brittan) to Wilson? Or was the ‘Heath experiment’ a dry run for<br />

Thatcher’s neo-liberalism, and if so why was it so rapidly abandoned? Was Heath the last <strong>of</strong><br />

the One Nation Tories or the first <strong>of</strong> the Thatcherites?<br />

4. By 1974 the vote for both main parties was declining. Why did the promise <strong>of</strong><br />

modernisation not fulfilled? Was it a failure <strong>of</strong> leadership? Or did it go deeper than this?<br />

5.2 Essential readings<br />

Contemporary British History<br />

Gregory Elliott<br />

21, 3, 2007: special issue on Wilson governments<br />

including articles on economic policy, industrial<br />

relations, the machinery <strong>of</strong> government and the<br />

creative industries. For an overview see especially<br />

Glenn O’Hara and Helen Parr, ‘Introduction: the Fall<br />

and Rise <strong>of</strong> a Reputation’, pp. 295-302, and the same<br />

authors’ concluding feature.<br />

Labourism and the English Genius, 1993, ch. 3 (HD<br />

and Blackboard). An acerbic statement <strong>of</strong> the critical<br />

view.<br />

5.3 General texts and alternative readings<br />

Kenneth Morgan Britain Since 1945, chs 7-9<br />

David Childs Britain Since 1945, chs 7-9<br />

Richard Coopey et al, eds. The Wilson Governments 1964-1970, 1993. (Copies<br />

<strong>of</strong> David Horner’s chapter ‘The road to Scarborough:<br />

Wilson, Labour and the scientific revolution’ also in<br />

HD).<br />

Andrew Gamble<br />

Britain in Decline, 1994 edn, ch. 4 (copies in HD).<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!