Personal Jurisdiction and the Internet

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Dailey v. Popma • COA Test: Whether D through his internet activities, manifested an intent to target and focus on North Carolina citizens • Not enough that some BB participants were North Carolinians. • Nor was it enough that D’s postings affected P in North Carolina. • Because P did not meet burden to show materials were posted with intent to direct content to NC, and presented no other evidence linking D to NC, dismissal was appropriate
Blumenthal v. Drudge, 992 F. Supp. 44 (D. DC 1998). • Defamation case involving statements on a website published by Matt Drudge of The Drudge Report. • Claim was that Blumenthal (a high level Clinton official) regularly beat his wife.
Page 1 and 2: PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND THE INTER
Page 3 and 4: General Background • Doing anythi
Page 5 and 6: Personal Jurisdiction Focus • Has
Page 7 and 8: Personal Jurisdiction (The Standard
Page 9 and 10: Dailey v. Popma • D, Georgia resi
Page 11: Dailey v. Popma • Complaint alleg
Page 15: • Havey v. Valentine, 172 N.C. Ap

Personal Jurisdiction and the Internet

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?