18.07.2014 Views

Discrete Geometry and Extremal Graph Theory - IMSA

Discrete Geometry and Extremal Graph Theory - IMSA

Discrete Geometry and Extremal Graph Theory - IMSA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

We begin by proving the following.<br />

Theorem 1. A graph G on n vertices without a 4-cycle contains at most cn 3/2 edges for<br />

some constant c > 0.<br />

Proof of Theorem 1. Let d 1 , d 2 , . . . , d n be the degrees of the vertices v 1 , v 2 , . . . , v n of G.<br />

Let E be the number of edges of G, so 2E = ∑ n<br />

i=1 d i. For a pair of vertices v 1 <strong>and</strong> v 2 , note<br />

that there can be at most one other vertex v 3 connected to both v 1 <strong>and</strong> v 2 . Otherwise, for<br />

if v 4 was also joined to v 1 <strong>and</strong> v 2 , we would have a 4-cycle with vertices v 1 , v 3 , v 2 , v 4 . Thus,<br />

more generally, for a vertex v i connected to d i other vertices, we count every pair of these d i<br />

vertices. If we repeat this count for all the vertices v 1 , v 2 , . . . , v n , note that our total count<br />

must less than the total number of pairs of vertices, ( n<br />

2)<br />

. This is because every pair of some<br />

d i vertices connected to v i can be uniquely associated with v i . In other words, we have the<br />

following inequality.<br />

( )<br />

d1<br />

+<br />

2<br />

(<br />

d2<br />

) ( ) (<br />

dn n<br />

+ · · · ≤ .<br />

2 2 2)<br />

We claim that ( d 1<br />

) (<br />

2 +<br />

d2<br />

) (<br />

2 + · · ·<br />

dn<br />

)<br />

2 ≥<br />

2E 2<br />

− E, so it will follow that<br />

n<br />

( )<br />

2E 2 n<br />

n − E ≤ n(n − 1)<br />

=<br />

2 2<br />

⇒ 4E 2 − 2En ≤ n 2 (n − 1).<br />

Thus, ( )<br />

2E − n 2<br />

2 ≤ n 2 (n − 1) + n2 ≤ 4 n3 , so we have 2E ≤ n 3/2 + n . Finally, we conclude<br />

2<br />

that E ∼ < n 3/2 (<strong>and</strong> actually, c ≈ 1 will suffice for sufficiently large n).<br />

2<br />

Now, we give two proofs of the inequality ( d 1<br />

) (<br />

2 +<br />

d2<br />

) (<br />

2 + · · · +<br />

dn<br />

)<br />

2 ≥<br />

2E 2<br />

− E. n<br />

• First Proof. By the Quadratic-Arithmetic Mean Inequality (or Cauchy-Schwartz), we<br />

have<br />

( )<br />

d1<br />

+<br />

2<br />

( )<br />

d2<br />

+ · · · +<br />

2<br />

( )<br />

dn<br />

= 1 2 2 (d2 1 + d 2 2 + · · · + d 2 n) − 1 2 (d 1 + d 2 + · · · + d n )<br />

≥ 1<br />

2n (2E)2 − E.<br />

• Second Proof. As a function, f(x) = ( )<br />

x<br />

2 =<br />

x(x−1)<br />

is convex, so by Jensen’s inequality,<br />

2<br />

we have ( ) ( ) ( ) 2E<br />

)<br />

d1 d2<br />

dn<br />

+ + · · · + ≥ n(<br />

n<br />

= 2E2<br />

2 2<br />

2 2 n − E.<br />

This concludes our proof. <br />

The “Θ-graph” is the union of three internally disjoint (simple) paths that have the same<br />

two end vertices, as shown below.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!