Discrete Geometry and Extremal Graph Theory - IMSA
Discrete Geometry and Extremal Graph Theory - IMSA
Discrete Geometry and Extremal Graph Theory - IMSA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
We begin by proving the following.<br />
Theorem 1. A graph G on n vertices without a 4-cycle contains at most cn 3/2 edges for<br />
some constant c > 0.<br />
Proof of Theorem 1. Let d 1 , d 2 , . . . , d n be the degrees of the vertices v 1 , v 2 , . . . , v n of G.<br />
Let E be the number of edges of G, so 2E = ∑ n<br />
i=1 d i. For a pair of vertices v 1 <strong>and</strong> v 2 , note<br />
that there can be at most one other vertex v 3 connected to both v 1 <strong>and</strong> v 2 . Otherwise, for<br />
if v 4 was also joined to v 1 <strong>and</strong> v 2 , we would have a 4-cycle with vertices v 1 , v 3 , v 2 , v 4 . Thus,<br />
more generally, for a vertex v i connected to d i other vertices, we count every pair of these d i<br />
vertices. If we repeat this count for all the vertices v 1 , v 2 , . . . , v n , note that our total count<br />
must less than the total number of pairs of vertices, ( n<br />
2)<br />
. This is because every pair of some<br />
d i vertices connected to v i can be uniquely associated with v i . In other words, we have the<br />
following inequality.<br />
( )<br />
d1<br />
+<br />
2<br />
(<br />
d2<br />
) ( ) (<br />
dn n<br />
+ · · · ≤ .<br />
2 2 2)<br />
We claim that ( d 1<br />
) (<br />
2 +<br />
d2<br />
) (<br />
2 + · · ·<br />
dn<br />
)<br />
2 ≥<br />
2E 2<br />
− E, so it will follow that<br />
n<br />
( )<br />
2E 2 n<br />
n − E ≤ n(n − 1)<br />
=<br />
2 2<br />
⇒ 4E 2 − 2En ≤ n 2 (n − 1).<br />
Thus, ( )<br />
2E − n 2<br />
2 ≤ n 2 (n − 1) + n2 ≤ 4 n3 , so we have 2E ≤ n 3/2 + n . Finally, we conclude<br />
2<br />
that E ∼ < n 3/2 (<strong>and</strong> actually, c ≈ 1 will suffice for sufficiently large n).<br />
2<br />
Now, we give two proofs of the inequality ( d 1<br />
) (<br />
2 +<br />
d2<br />
) (<br />
2 + · · · +<br />
dn<br />
)<br />
2 ≥<br />
2E 2<br />
− E. n<br />
• First Proof. By the Quadratic-Arithmetic Mean Inequality (or Cauchy-Schwartz), we<br />
have<br />
( )<br />
d1<br />
+<br />
2<br />
( )<br />
d2<br />
+ · · · +<br />
2<br />
( )<br />
dn<br />
= 1 2 2 (d2 1 + d 2 2 + · · · + d 2 n) − 1 2 (d 1 + d 2 + · · · + d n )<br />
≥ 1<br />
2n (2E)2 − E.<br />
• Second Proof. As a function, f(x) = ( )<br />
x<br />
2 =<br />
x(x−1)<br />
is convex, so by Jensen’s inequality,<br />
2<br />
we have ( ) ( ) ( ) 2E<br />
)<br />
d1 d2<br />
dn<br />
+ + · · · + ≥ n(<br />
n<br />
= 2E2<br />
2 2<br />
2 2 n − E.<br />
This concludes our proof. <br />
The “Θ-graph” is the union of three internally disjoint (simple) paths that have the same<br />
two end vertices, as shown below.<br />
2