20.07.2014 Views

SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program - Society of Petroleum Engineers

SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program - Society of Petroleum Engineers

SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program - Society of Petroleum Engineers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>SPE</strong> <strong>Distinguished</strong> <strong>Lecturer</strong> <strong>Program</strong><br />

The <strong>SPE</strong> <strong>Distinguished</strong> <strong>Lecturer</strong> <strong>Program</strong> is funded principally<br />

through a grant from the <strong>SPE</strong> Foundation.<br />

The society gratefully acknowledges the companies that support<br />

this program by allowing their pr<strong>of</strong>essionals to participate as<br />

lecturers.<br />

Special thanks to the American Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Mining, Metallurgical, and <strong>Petroleum</strong><br />

<strong>Engineers</strong> (AIME) for its contribution to<br />

the program.<br />

<strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Petroleum</strong> <strong>Engineers</strong><br />

<strong>Distinguished</strong> <strong>Lecturer</strong> <strong>Program</strong><br />

www.spe.org/dl<br />

www.senergyltd.com


The Strategic Significance and<br />

Practicalities <strong>of</strong> CO2 EOR and Storage<br />

David S Hughes<br />

(david.hughes@senergyworld.com)<br />

Carbon Storage Specialist<br />

USA, April 2009<br />

<strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Petroleum</strong> <strong>Engineers</strong><br />

<strong>Distinguished</strong> <strong>Lecturer</strong> <strong>Program</strong><br />

www.spe.org/dl<br />

www.senergyltd.com


Geological Storage <strong>of</strong> CO2<br />

• New business stream for oil industry<br />

• Store liquid CO2 in depleted oil and gas fields<br />

and also saline aquifers<br />

• Synergies with existing operations through<br />

reuse <strong>of</strong> infrastructure etc. and possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

increasing hydrocarbon recovery<br />

• Contributes to the fight on global warming<br />

• Has value through Cap and Trade<br />

arrangements such as the EU emissions trading<br />

scheme<br />

• But comes with regulations and liabilities<br />

• Uses all our skills


IPCC Prediction <strong>of</strong> Requirement for<br />

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)<br />

• From ~2030 amount <strong>of</strong><br />

CO2 that requires to be<br />

stored is ~4 billion<br />

tonnes/year, rising to<br />

~18 billion tonnes/year<br />

in 2095<br />

• c.f.3.9 billion<br />

tonnes/year oil<br />

production and 2.5<br />

billion tonnes oil<br />

equivalent/year gas<br />

production in 2005<br />

2030<br />

From IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage 2005 and BP Statistical Review, 2006


CO2 Flooding is a Major Enhanced Oil<br />

Recovery (EOR) Process in USA<br />

CO2 to Canada<br />

Weyburn<br />

25,000 bbl/d<br />

En Cana<br />

2006 statistics<br />

• 45 million tonnes fresh<br />

CO2 injected per year<br />

(USA)<br />

• 53 projects USA (80<br />

worldwide)<br />

• ~180,000 b/d USA<br />

(~260,000 b/d<br />

worldwide)<br />

• 1/3 <strong>of</strong> one percent <strong>of</strong><br />

world production<br />

Rockies<br />

5 Fields – Additional 2<br />

Proposed (Anadarko)<br />

19,520 Gross Bbls/d<br />

Operators:<br />

Exxon/Chevron/Merit<br />

CO 2 Source:<br />

Natural/Manufacturing<br />

LeBarge<br />

McElmo<br />

Dome<br />

Ridgeway CO 2<br />

Discovery<br />

Permian Basin<br />

42 Fields<br />

155,000 Gross<br />

Bbls/d<br />

Operator: Multiple<br />

(16)<br />

CO 2 Source:<br />

Natural<br />

Sheep<br />

Mountain<br />

CO2 supply<br />

network<br />

Bravo<br />

Dome<br />

Great Plains<br />

Coal<br />

Gasification<br />

Plant<br />

Gas<br />

Plants<br />

Mid-Continent<br />

4 Fields<br />

9,800 Gross Bbls/d<br />

Operators:<br />

Exxon/Anadarko/Chaparral<br />

CO 2 Source: Manufacturing<br />

Ammonia<br />

Plant<br />

Jackson<br />

Dome<br />

Eastern Gulf Gulf Coast<br />

3 Fields<br />

8,000 Gross Bbls/d<br />

Operator: Denbury<br />

CO 2 Source: Natural


World Coal Resources


Contribution to UK CO2 Emissions<br />

From Power Sector<br />

• UK CO2 emissions 2008<br />

532 million tonnes*<br />

• About 1/3 from fossil<br />

fuelled power stations<br />

• 23 million tonnes at Drax<br />

in England<br />

• 10 million tonnes at<br />

Longannet in Scotland<br />

*UK DECC, 26 March 2009


UK Commitment to Reduction in CO2<br />

Emissions<br />

• Under Kyoto Protocol UK committed to reducing greenhouse<br />

gas emissions by 12.5% from their 1990 level by 2008-2012<br />

(achieved 23% to 2008*)<br />

• 2008 Climate Change Act has set legally binding targets for<br />

the UK to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80%<br />

by 2050, and CO2 emissions by at least 26% by 2020, from<br />

1990 base (achieved 13% CO2 reduction to 2008*)<br />

• Also requires the Government to set five year carbon budgets,<br />

in order to set out a trajectory for emissions reductions to<br />

2050<br />

• Government sees Carbon Capture and Storage<br />

(Sequestration) making a significant contribution towards<br />

achieving these targets<br />

• Principal funding mechanism issuing allowances and allowing<br />

them to be traded (EU Emissions Trading Scheme)<br />

*UK Department <strong>of</strong> Energy and Climate Change, 9 February and 26 March 2009


Fighting Climate Change (a year ago)<br />

We’re fighting<br />

climate<br />

change with<br />

techna-ology<br />

We’re<br />

legislating


Fighting Climate Change (now)<br />

We’re<br />

legislating<br />

We’ve<br />

legislated


Decarbonisation <strong>of</strong> UK Fossil Electricity<br />

Supply<br />

PetaJoule (10 15 Joule)<br />

1 MWh = 3.6 10 9 Joules<br />

UK Power Generation – Scenario<br />

with 80% cut in CO2 Emissions<br />

• Plan for UK fossil power supply<br />

to be decarbonised (coal) by<br />

2030<br />

• CO2 Capture rates (million<br />

tonnes per year)<br />

2020-<br />

25<br />

2025-<br />

30<br />

2030-<br />

35<br />

2035-<br />

40<br />

2040-<br />

45<br />

2045-<br />

50<br />

18 82 145 180 202 206<br />

From Heather Haydock, AEA, City and Financial CCS<br />

Summit, 2 and 3 December 2008


Proposed New Power Stations with CO2<br />

Capture and Storage<br />

CO2 (mill te/y)<br />

21<br />

15<br />

5<br />

CO2 Captured<br />

• Proposed programme would<br />

capture up to 80 million tonnes<br />

per year at 90% load factor<br />

• So in 50 years 2 - 4 billion<br />

tonnes needs to be stored<br />

depending load factor<br />

3 6<br />

3<br />

8<br />

6<br />

10<br />

CO2 Storage Options<br />

• Oil fields including enhanced<br />

oil recovery (EOR)<br />

• Depleted gas fields<br />

• Saline aquifers<br />

Map: ENDS Report July 2007


Coal<br />

Oil<br />

Natural Gas<br />

Capture Options (~90%)<br />

H 2 +CO 2 H 2 +CO<br />

• Coal 900 kg CO2 per MWh<br />

• Gas 400 kg CO2 per MWh<br />

Exhaust, 0.3 - 0.5% CO 2<br />

Power Plant<br />

Conventional<br />

CO 2<br />

Capture<br />

2H 2 + O 2 2H 2 O<br />

Gasification<br />

Reforming<br />

Water-<br />

Shift<br />

CO 2<br />

Capture<br />

Power Plant<br />

Hydrogen-rich fuel<br />

CO 2<br />

storage<br />

Post Combustion Capture<br />

Pre-combustion Capture<br />

Oxyfuel Combustion<br />

H 2 for other uses<br />

Exhaust,<br />

0.1 - 0.5% CO 2<br />

CH 4 + O 2<br />

Power Plant<br />

Oxy-fuel<br />

combustion<br />

CO 2 + 2H 2 O<br />

Air<br />

Separation<br />

Water<br />

Removal


Sources and Potential Sinks <strong>of</strong> CO2<br />

Around North Sea<br />

Geographical<br />

Information System<br />

– Decision Support<br />

System<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> EU<br />

GESTCO Project<br />

British Geological<br />

Survey, February 2005


SNS Gas Fields CO2 Storage Potential<br />

• 53 fields most Permian<br />

Leman Sandstone<br />

• Proven geological trap for<br />

hydrocarbon gas<br />

• Near to CO2 sources<br />

• Existing infrastructure<br />

• Well and pressure depletion<br />

may have compromised trap<br />

• Aquifer influx may reduce<br />

capacity<br />

• CO2 capacity ~2.8 billion<br />

tonnes


SNS Bunter Sandstone CO2 Storage<br />

Potential<br />

• A number <strong>of</strong> potentially<br />

suitable saline aquifers have<br />

been identified with<br />

cumulative capacity maybe<br />

10s billions tonnes<br />

• For example SNS Bunter<br />

sandstone<br />

– 29 closed structures<br />

– Good porosity (average 18.7%)<br />

and permeability<br />

– 650-9800 ft deep<br />

– Near to CO2 sources<br />

– Good seal (mudstones and<br />

evaporites) - gas bearing in<br />

places proves trap (or not!)<br />

– Some existing infrastructure<br />

– Cut by faults which may leak<br />

Material on SNS gas field and aquifer storage from: An assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

carbon sequestration potential in the UK – SNS case study, Michele<br />

Bentham, January 2006, Tyndall Centre


CO2 EOR Onshore - Advantages<br />

• CO2 supply network<br />

• High well density, pattern flood, relatively<br />

cheap to redrill/refurbish<br />

• Relatively low secondary recovery (35-45%)<br />

• Phased implementation<br />

• Large surface area available for facilities<br />

• Currently economic


CO2 EOR Offshore - Challenges<br />

• Limited CO2 supply (at least at present)<br />

• Fewer wells, peripheral flood, expensive new<br />

wells and workovers<br />

• High secondary recovery (55-70%)<br />

• Single implementation (i.e. no chance to<br />

introduce the project in phases)<br />

• Existing facilities mainly incompatible with<br />

high CO2 content in fluids<br />

• Limited weight and space for new facilities<br />

• Estimated UK North Sea EOR-related CO2<br />

capacity 0.5-1.9 billion tonnes (1-2.8 billion<br />

barrels incremental oil)<br />

• But probably need $100 barrel for <strong>of</strong>fshore EOR<br />

to be economic


Well Density – Onshore vs. Offshore<br />

10 acre spacing (660ft sq) 600 acre spacing (5500ft sq)<br />

http://www.opec.org/home/Press%20Room/EU-OPEC%20presentations/Iain%20Wright%20-%20Presentation.pdf


UK Carbon Capture, Transport and<br />

Storage Competition<br />

• Single CCS project up to 100% funding<br />

(around £1 billion)<br />

• Offshore disposal <strong>of</strong> CO2<br />

• Coal (including oxyfuel) with post-combustion<br />

capture (i.e. using technology that can be<br />

retro-fitted and capable <strong>of</strong> being deployed in<br />

China etc.)<br />

• 300 - 400 MW (~ 2 million tonnes/y <strong>of</strong> CO2)<br />

• First CO2 capture and storage by 2014<br />

• Discussions ongoing with three consortia to<br />

close contract in September 2009<br />

• One <strong>of</strong> 10 - 12 demonstration projects in EU<br />

by 2015


Sleipner CO2 Storage Project<br />

Images: Alligator film /BUG / Øyvind Hagen StatoilHydro<br />

• Natural gas in Sleipner<br />

contains 9 mol% CO2<br />

• Offshore chemical capture<br />

plant reduces CO2 content<br />

<strong>of</strong> gas for export to


Weyburn CO2 EOR, Saskatchewan,<br />

Canada<br />

200 mile pipeline - 2 million tonnes/year (~100 million scf/d)<br />

130 mill barrel<br />

30 mill te CO2


Weyburn - 4D Seismic Monitoring


CCS Activity Map<br />

Canada<br />

USA<br />

Norway<br />

UK<br />

Europe<br />

Algeria<br />

UAE<br />

India<br />

Japan<br />

China<br />

South Africa<br />

Australia


USA CO2 Emissions and Reduction Targets<br />

• GHG emissions in 2005 were 7206 million (metric)<br />

tonnes CO2 equivalent (actual CO2 emissions were<br />

6032 million tonnes or 84% <strong>of</strong> total)<br />

• Compared with 1990, 2007 CO2 emissions were<br />

20% higher (34% higher from electricity generation)<br />

• Kyoto target (non- signatory) was a reduction <strong>of</strong> 7%<br />

• Reduction targets in Henry Waxman (House<br />

Energy and Commerce Chairman) bill are 3% by<br />

2012, 20% by 2020, 42% by 2030 and 83% by<br />

2050 compared with 2005 base<br />

• Note that the 2050 figure is 66% reduction<br />

compared with 1990 base<br />

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/carbon.html<br />

American Clean Energy and Security Act <strong>of</strong> 2009 (Draft), 30 March 2009


American Clean Energy and Security Act <strong>of</strong><br />

2009 (Draft)<br />

• Act will establish Carbon Storage Research<br />

Corporation with role to seed fund commercial<br />

scale CCS with levy on fossil fuelled electricity<br />

generation <strong>of</strong> $1 billion per annum for ten years<br />

• Also establishes coordinated approach to permitting<br />

and certifying geological storage sites including<br />

subsurface property rights<br />

• Establishes reporting and regulation regime for<br />

CO2 injection sites including those associated with<br />

enhanced hydrocarbon recovery<br />

• Deals with liabilities for closed sites<br />

American Clean Energy and Security Act <strong>of</strong> 2009 (Draft), 30 March 2009


Establishes US Wide Cap and Trade System<br />

• Allowance trading system from 2012 covering<br />

power utilities, oil companies and large<br />

industrial sources totaling 85% <strong>of</strong> GHG<br />

emissions (>25,000 tonnes/year)<br />

• Number <strong>of</strong> allowances reduced each year to<br />

meet emissions reduction targets<br />

• 100% auctioning <strong>of</strong> allowances (23% revenue<br />

used for clean energy investment rest returned<br />

to people, communities and businesses)<br />

• Trading system designed to establish and<br />

maintain an effective, transparent, and fair<br />

market for emissions allowances and preserve<br />

the integrity <strong>of</strong> the cap on emissions<br />

American Clean Energy and Security Act <strong>of</strong> 2009 (Draft), 30 March 2009


US Projected Power Generation by Fuel Type<br />

and CO2 Emissions (Unabated)<br />

US DOE/NETL Carbon Sequestration<br />

Atlas <strong>of</strong> USA and Canada, 2008<br />

American Clean Energy and<br />

Security Act <strong>of</strong> 2009 (Draft),<br />

30 March 2009


US CO2 Emissions from Power Sector<br />

• From power sector<br />

– 2.4 billion tonnes/y<br />

CO2 (US)<br />

– 5-6 billion tonnes/y<br />

CO2 (worldwide)<br />

• Growing substantially<br />

– Expected to be by<br />

1/3 rd in US over next<br />

20 years without<br />

action to reduce<br />

emissions<br />

CO2 emissions from electricity generation<br />

(blue circles) and other industrial sources


US CO2 Storage Options<br />

• Oil and gas fields 91<br />

billion tonnes (red)<br />

• Saline formations<br />

3378 billion tonnes<br />

(blue)<br />

• Unmineable coal<br />

seams 202 billion<br />

tonnes (yellow)


FutureGen<br />

(Original Project May Be Revived)<br />

• 245 MW IGCC (gasifies coal to<br />

produce hydrogen and CO2)<br />

• In December 2007 awarded to<br />

Mattoon Township, Coles<br />

County, Illinois<br />

• 1 million tonnes CO2 per<br />

annum to be stored in saline<br />

formation below site<br />

• Funding canceled in January<br />

2008 because <strong>of</strong> escalating<br />

costs ($1.8 billion gross, 74%<br />

from DOE)<br />

• In March 2009 Secretary <strong>of</strong><br />

Energy Steven Chu<br />

expressed support for<br />

reviving FutureGen using<br />

stimulus funds<br />

• Part <strong>of</strong> a larger portfolio <strong>of</strong><br />

international demonstration<br />

projects<br />

• Cost now estimated at $2.3<br />

billion


FutureGen<br />

• Original single project program restructured mid-2008<br />

to provide grants to multiple projects ($100-600 million<br />

each)<br />

• Total available around $1.3 billion<br />

• 300-600 MW IGCC with Carbon Capture<br />

• Goal <strong>of</strong> 90% capture (minimum 81%)<br />

• CCS demonstration for 3-5 years with monitoring<br />

continuing for further 2 years<br />

• At least 1 million tonnes per year <strong>of</strong> CO2 at each<br />

project<br />

• Applications closed 8 th October 2008<br />

• Start 2015


Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships<br />

• Joint government and industry initiative to determine the most suitable<br />

technologies, regulations, and infrastructure needed for CCS<br />

• Geographical differences in fossil fuel use and sequestration sinks<br />

across the US dictate regional approaches<br />

• Seven partnerships:<br />

– Big Sky Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (Big Sky)<br />

– Plains CO2 Reduction Partnership (PCOR)<br />

– Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium (MGSC)<br />

– Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP)<br />

– Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (SECARB)<br />

– Southwest Regional Partnership on Carbon Sequestration (SWP)<br />

– West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership<br />

(WESTCARB)<br />

• Network includes 350+ state agencies, universities, and private<br />

companies, spanning 41 states, two Indian nations, and four Canadian<br />

provinces<br />

http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/partnerships/partnerships.html


Hydrogen Energy’s IGCC with CCS in<br />

California<br />

• Application for Certification<br />

before the California Energy<br />

Commission filed 31 July<br />

2008<br />

• Located in Kern County<br />

(moved from Long Beach)<br />

• Fuelled by petroleum coke or<br />

coke/coal blends<br />

• 390 MW gross output<br />

• 2+ million tonnes/y CO2<br />

captured (90%)<br />

• Used for enhanced oil<br />

recovery and storage in<br />

Occidental’s nearby Elk Hills<br />

oil field


Business Model<br />

• Three distinct types <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

– Power generation<br />

– Transportation (pipelines and ships)<br />

– Storage and EOR<br />

• Each has their own stakeholders,<br />

regulation regime, tax regime, subsidy<br />

entitlement<br />

• How are interests aligned?<br />

• Business model(s) will evolve over next<br />

decade


Conclusions<br />

• CO2 storage is a substantial new business for<br />

the oil industry<br />

• Uses most <strong>of</strong> our skills but is a significant<br />

challenge<br />

• Is an absolute necessity to make significant<br />

reductions in CO2 emissions<br />

• Opens up the use <strong>of</strong> vast coal stocks<br />

• Provides energy security through diversity<br />

• Enables hydrogen to be used as energy carrier


Acknowledgements<br />

• <strong>SPE</strong> <strong>Distinguished</strong> <strong>Lecturer</strong> <strong>Program</strong><br />

• Senergy for allowing me to participate<br />

One day training course<br />

Introduction to the Geological Storage <strong>of</strong> Carbon Dioxide (CO2)<br />

Course outline at: www.senergyworld.com/training

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!