23.07.2014 Views

PUBLIC PREMISES (Eviction of unauthorized occupants) Act 1971

PUBLIC PREMISES (Eviction of unauthorized occupants) Act 1971

PUBLIC PREMISES (Eviction of unauthorized occupants) Act 1971

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1) That the show cause notice was received late,<br />

2) The respondent was a tenant and not a licensee and hence his case was covered under the Transfer <strong>of</strong><br />

Property <strong>Act</strong>.<br />

3) That the respondent had filed suit against the termination <strong>of</strong> license notice in the Thane Civil Court and that the<br />

court had passed an order that the respondent should not be evicted without following due process <strong>of</strong> law.<br />

The Petitioner gave inspection <strong>of</strong> documents relied upon by them to the advocate <strong>of</strong> respondent namely the copy <strong>of</strong><br />

the approved Site Plan prepared for remodeling <strong>of</strong> the Station building and improvement <strong>of</strong> the circulating area.<br />

The document have been placed in the record <strong>of</strong> the case. The copy <strong>of</strong> site plan is provided to advocate <strong>of</strong><br />

respondent.<br />

Written evidence <strong>of</strong> Shri SHIV KUMAR Assistant Engineer <strong>of</strong> the petitioner was duly recorded wherein he had stated<br />

that the space is required for remodelling <strong>of</strong> station at Mumbra and that the stalls were causing a lot <strong>of</strong><br />

congestion and inconvenience to commuters. He has also deposed that number <strong>of</strong> passengers using Mumbra<br />

Rly station has increased considerably over the years and that the stalls cause congestion in the present day<br />

circumstances. He has also explained the drawing before me wherefrom it can be seen that the booking <strong>of</strong>fice is<br />

to be made and that the shops are required to be removed to ease congestion in station circulating area.<br />

Railway witness was cross-examined by advocate Gautam. Under cross the witness has admitted that the work <strong>of</strong><br />

remodelling is going on, he has stated that new booking <strong>of</strong>fice has come up and old booking <strong>of</strong>fice is removed.<br />

He has further stated that remodelling work has started about 2 years back and is going on at present and that<br />

the shops are hindrances. The copy <strong>of</strong> evidence and cross-examination was given to advocate for respondent.<br />

The respondents led evidence through on Shri Swaminath Gupta the same was adopted for all the 11 stalls by<br />

advocate Gautam. Shri Swaminath Gupta stated that the land belongs to Railways but the structure belonged to<br />

individual stall holders. He also stated that the Rly’s have already made the new booking <strong>of</strong>fice. He stated that<br />

TMC has demolished some shops at Mumbra and that, he also stated that their stalls were not causing any<br />

congestion as alleged. He has deposed that before he is removed he should be given alternative<br />

SRCETC/TBM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!