guide to pre-advising in honours philosophy - University of St Andrews
guide to pre-advising in honours philosophy - University of St Andrews
guide to pre-advising in honours philosophy - University of St Andrews
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Suggested Read<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
John Rawls, A Theory <strong>of</strong> Justice (revised ed.), OUP 1999.<br />
Robert Good<strong>in</strong> & Philip Pettit, Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology,<br />
Blackwell 2005.<br />
Will Kymlicka, Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction (2 nd ed.), OUP<br />
2002.<br />
PY4611 CLASSICAL PHILOSOPHY<br />
Credits: 30.0<br />
Pre-requisite: PY2003<br />
Course coord<strong>in</strong>a<strong>to</strong>r: Sarah Broadie (email: sjb15)<br />
Class Hour: TBA<br />
Description: We shall conduct a thorough study <strong>of</strong> central and substantial texts <strong>in</strong><br />
classical <strong>philosophy</strong>, with close attention <strong>to</strong> the philosophical implications. Examples:<br />
Pla<strong>to</strong>'s Theaetetus and Sophist, or Timaeus and Philebus, or Laches, Charmides, and<br />
Lysis; Aris<strong>to</strong>tle's On the Soul, or Eudemian Ethics, or some books <strong>of</strong> the Physics. It is<br />
not ruled out that the focus <strong>in</strong> some years would be on the <strong>pre</strong>-socratics, or on<br />
Socrates and the 5th century sophists, or on Hellenistic <strong>philosophy</strong>, or on Pla<strong>to</strong>nism<br />
after Pla<strong>to</strong>.<br />
Assessment method: 50% cont<strong>in</strong>uous assessment; 50% exam<br />
Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary Read<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
Pla<strong>to</strong>'s Theaetetus (Levett translation, Hackett Publish<strong>in</strong>g Co.)<br />
PY4612 ADVANCED LOGIC<br />
Credits: 30.0<br />
Pre-Requisite: PY2001<br />
Anti-requisite: PY4816<br />
Course coord<strong>in</strong>a<strong>to</strong>rs and teachers: Aaron Cotnoir (email: ac117)<br />
Class Hour: TBA<br />
Description: The module <strong>pre</strong>supposes acqua<strong>in</strong>tance with and facility <strong>in</strong> the<br />
elementary practice <strong>of</strong> logic as set out <strong>in</strong> PY2001, and proceeds <strong>to</strong> consider and prove<br />
standard metalogical results, the central one <strong>of</strong> which is Henk<strong>in</strong>'s pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the strong<br />
completeness <strong>of</strong> classical first-order <strong>pre</strong>dicate logic. There will then be <strong>pre</strong>para<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
discussion <strong>of</strong> elementary set theory, the theory <strong>of</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>als and card<strong>in</strong>als, and formal<br />
semantics. As an <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>to</strong> the metatheoretical methods we will consider pro<strong>of</strong><br />
by (mathematical) <strong>in</strong>duction, as it commonly appears <strong>in</strong> metalogic <strong>in</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> by<br />
<strong>in</strong>duction on the degree (i.e., complexity) <strong>of</strong> wffs. Follow<strong>in</strong>g rigorous pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> Henk<strong>in</strong>'s<br />
16