28.07.2014 Views

The Cost of Future Collisions in LEO - Star Technology and Research

The Cost of Future Collisions in LEO - Star Technology and Research

The Cost of Future Collisions in LEO - Star Technology and Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18<br />

Fig. 10. <strong>The</strong> virtual stream <strong>and</strong> collision events.<br />

τ c , formula (41) turns <strong>in</strong>to (17), as expected, because it reflects accumulation <strong>of</strong><br />

the collision probability with time. Fig. 10 illustrates the relation between the<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> the average virtual stream (41) <strong>and</strong> a particular realization <strong>of</strong> the collision<br />

process. Virtual streams can also be evaluated as averages <strong>of</strong> many simulation runs<br />

<strong>in</strong> numerical models <strong>of</strong> the debris environment [1,2,10].<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to formula (41), the fragments <strong>in</strong> the average virtual stream are<br />

produced at a constant rate (42). In a small period <strong>of</strong> time dτ, the fragment density<br />

is <strong>in</strong>creased by dρ = Udτ. Once created, the fragments start migrat<strong>in</strong>g down at the<br />

rates proportional to the air density at their altitudes. After time τ at an altitude<br />

H, we will see fragments from all layers between H <strong>and</strong> H τ , where H τ is def<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

the solution <strong>of</strong> equation (37) with the <strong>in</strong>itial altitude H. Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the<br />

density scal<strong>in</strong>g rule (35) <strong>and</strong> disregard<strong>in</strong>g the radius variation between the layers,<br />

we f<strong>in</strong>d that<br />

ρ τ (m, H) ≈<br />

∫ τ<br />

0<br />

Ḣ t<br />

Ḣ U(m, H t) d˜t =<br />

∫<br />

1<br />

Hτ<br />

U(m, h) dh, (43)<br />

λt y ρ a (H) H<br />

where ˜t = t/t y is time <strong>in</strong> years, <strong>and</strong> t y is a period <strong>of</strong> one year. Integration yields<br />

1 ∑<br />

ρ τ ≈<br />

P ki f ki (m) [G ki (H) − G ki (H τ )], (44)<br />

λt y ρ a (H)<br />

k,i<br />

where G ki (H) is the cumulative distribution by altitude (9), which can be applied<br />

<strong>in</strong> a particular form <strong>of</strong> (15).<br />

Transition<strong>in</strong>g to the average flux, as we transitioned from (17) to (21), we<br />

derive the follow<strong>in</strong>g formula for the average virtual flux <strong>of</strong> fragments heavier than<br />

m, adjusted for the orbital decay due to air drag,<br />

Φ n ≈<br />

k n<br />

λt y ρ a (H)<br />

∑<br />

β nk P ki F ki (m) [G ki (H) − G ki (H τ )], (45)<br />

k,i<br />

where the coefficient k n has the same mean<strong>in</strong>g as <strong>in</strong> formula (21).<br />

To account for the variability <strong>of</strong> the ballistic coefficients <strong>of</strong> the fragments [11],<br />

we use a statistical average<br />

Φ a =<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

Φ n n(b c ) db c , (46)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!